Diet Drug Disaster: The Story of Redux and Fen-Phen*

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O'Donnell

The Fen-Phen Diet combines two FDA approved drugs. Although both drugs showed significant weight loss in controlled studies, no long-term studies of safety had been performed at the time of approval. It was thought that fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine, the active racemate of fenfluramine, suppressed appetite like other amphetamine-related drugs. Phentermine was thought to act as a balance to the adverse effects of abstinence from food and irritability from CNS stimulation caused by dexfenfluramine. Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) was known to be a rare risk at time of approval and prompted the recommendation that use be restricted to morbidly obese patients for short periods of time (6–8 weeks). An unanticipated danger of using these two drugs in combination is that together they can produce an overdosage of serotonin. The development of cardiac valvulopathies in otherwise healthy people recalled similar pathology in response to overdosage of serotonin from other medications or from a serotonin producing tumor of the Gl (carcinoid syndrome). Serotonin pharmacology is considered to illustrate the complexity of this remarkable chemical that has properties of neurotransmitter and hormone. Since this anorexogenic epidemic affected millions of patients and because there are potential permanent residual pathologies, pharmacists will continue to be queried about the topic. A review of the Redux/Fen-Phen history, pharmacology of the anorexigenics, and interactions with serotonin agonists and antagonists is presented to provide the pharmacist with a succinct and current account of this dark chapter in pharmacotherapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Busetto ◽  
Fabio De Stefano ◽  
Sabrina Pigozzo ◽  
Gianni Segato ◽  
Maurizio De Luca ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Abbatini ◽  
Danila Capoccia ◽  
Giovanni Casella ◽  
Emanuele Soricelli ◽  
Frida Leonetti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Scopinaro ◽  
Giovanni Camerini ◽  
Francesco Papadia ◽  
Gabriella Andraghetti ◽  
Renzo Cordera ◽  
...  

Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Nedelcu ◽  
Marcelo Loureiro ◽  
Mehdi Skalli ◽  
Florence Galtier ◽  
Audrey Jaussent ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Moreno ◽  
J. Closset ◽  
S. Dugardeyn ◽  
M. Baréa ◽  
A. Mehdi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 919-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Keyser ◽  
Alois Philipp ◽  
Florian Zeman ◽  
Matthias Lubnow ◽  
Dirk Lunz ◽  
...  

Background: Extracorporeal life support systems are well-established devices for treating patients with acute cardiopulmonary failure. Severe or morbid obesity may result in complications such as limb ischemia, bleeding, unsuccessful cannulation, or infection at the cannulation sites. This article reports on our experience with cannulation and associated complications in severely and morbidly obese patients. Methods: Between January 2006 and September 2016, 153 severely or morbidly obese patients with a body mass index >35 kg/m2 were cannulated percutaneously for extracorporeal life support at our center. Among those, 115 patients were treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for acute lung failure and 38 patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock. Complications related to percutaneous access and long-term follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Primary focus was on the success of cannulation, outcome, thrombosis, bleeding, limb ischemia, and infection at the cannulation site. Normal-weight patients receiving extracorporeal life support served as control. Results: Percutaneous cannulation was successfully performed in all patients. Eighty-five (74%) patients were weaned from VV ECMO and 20 (52%) patients were weaned from VA ECMO. Limb ischemia requiring surgical intervention occurred in 5 (3%) patients, bleeding in 7 (5%) patients, and wound infection in 3 (2%) patients. In all other patients, decannulation was uneventful. These data as well as the long-term survival rates were comparable to those of normal-weight patients ( P > .05). Conclusion: Percutaneous vessel cannulation for extracorporeal life support systems is generally feasible. Therefore, percutaneous cannulation may well be performed in severely and morbidly obese patients. Patient outcome rather depends on appropriate support than on anatomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document