scholarly journals Gene Replacement Therapy: A Primer for the Health-system Pharmacist

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 846-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Petrich ◽  
Dominic Marchese ◽  
Chris Jenkins ◽  
Michael Storey ◽  
Jill Blind

Purpose: Comprehensive review of gene replacement therapy with guidance and expert opinion on handling and administration for pharmacists. Summary: There are currently ∼2600 gene therapy clinical trials worldwide and 4 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gene therapy products available in the United States. Gene therapy and its handling are different from other drugs; however, there is a lack of guidance from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), and professional associations regarding their pharmaceutical application. Although the NIH stratifies the backbone biologicals of viral vectors in gene therapies into risk groups, incomplete information regarding minimization of exposure and reduction of risk exists. In the absence of defined guidance, individual institutions develop their own policies and procedures, which often differ and are often outdated. This review provides expert opinion on the role of pharmacists in institutional preparedness, as well as gene therapy handling and administration. A suggested infrastructural model for gene replacement therapy handling is described, including requisite equipment acquisition and standard operating procedure development. Personnel, patient, and caregiver education and training are discussed. Conclusion: Pharmacists have a key role in the proper handling and general management of gene replacement therapies, identifying risk level, establishing infrastructure, and developing adequate policies and protocols, particularly in the absence of consensus guidelines for the handling and transport of gene replacement therapies.

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Leslie L. Muldoon ◽  
Edward A. Neuwelt

AbstractFor focal neurodegenerative diseases or brain tumors, localized delivery of protein or genetic vectors may be sufficient to alleviate symptoms, halt disease progression, or even cure the disease. One may circumvent the limitation imposed by the blood-brain barrier by transplantation of genetically altered cell grafts or focal inoculation of virus or protein. However, permanent gene replacement therapy for diseases affecting the entire brain will require global delivery of genetic vectors. The neurotoxicity of currently available viral vectors and the transient nature of transgene expression invivomust be overcome before their use in human gene therapy becomes clinically applicable.


2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (19) ◽  
pp. 5060-5068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard V. Walls ◽  
Manuel C. Lemos ◽  
Mahsa Javid ◽  
Miriam Bazan-Peregrino ◽  
Jeshmi Jeyabalan ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Wissmann ◽  
Barbara K. Goodman ◽  
Joseph G. Vockley ◽  
Rita M. Kern ◽  
Stephen D. Cederbaum ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
O Dabbous ◽  
DM Sproule ◽  
DE Feltner ◽  
M Droege ◽  
F Khan ◽  
...  

Background: SMA1, a rapidly progressing disease, results in muscle weakness, respiratory failure, hospitalization, and early death. This study highlights the value of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy for SMA1. Methods: Twelve SMA1 patients received a one-time intravenous proposed therapeutic dose of AVXS-101 (CL-101; NCT02122952). Event-free survival (no death/permanent ventilation), pulmonary/nutritional interventions, swallow function, hospitalization rates, CHOP-INTEND, motor milestones, and safety were assessed (2-year follow-up). Results: By study end, all 12 patients survived event-free; 7 did not require non-invasive ventilation; 11 had stable/improved swallowing function (6 exclusively fed by mouth); 11 spoke. On average, patients experienced 1.4 (SD=0.41, range=0–4.8) respiratory hospitalizations/year. The mean proportion of time hospitalized was 4.4% (range=0–18.3%); mean unadjusted rate of hospitalization/year was 2.1 (range=0–7.6), with a mean hospital stay of 6.7 (range=3–12.1) days. CHOP-INTEND increased by 9.8 (SD=3.9) and 15.4 (SD=6.4) points at 1- and 3-months post-treatment. At long-term follow-up, 11 patients sat unassisted, 4 stood with assistance, and 2 walked. Adverse events included elevated serum aminotransferase levels, which were attenuated by prednisolone. Conclusions: AVXS-101 in CL-101 resulted in dramatic survival and motor function improvements. The reduced healthcare utilization in treated infants could decrease cost and alleviate patient, caregiver, and societal burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document