Pregnancy-Related Venous Thromboembolism

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Armstrong ◽  
Jessica M. Bellone ◽  
Lori B. Hornsby ◽  
Sarah Treadway ◽  
Haley M. Phillippe

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), with a reported incidence ranging from 0.49 to 2 events per 1000 deliveries. Risk factors include advanced maternal age, obesity, smoking, and cesarian section. Women with a history of previous VTE are at a 4-fold higher risk of recurrent thromboembolic events during subsequent pregnancies. Additionally, the presence of concomitant thrombophilia, particularly factor V Leiden (homozygosity), prothrombin gene mutation (homozygosity), or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), increases the risk of pregnancy-related VTE. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) are the drugs of choice for anticoagulation during pregnancy. LMWH is preferred due to ease of use and lower rates of adverse events. Women with high thromboembolic risk particularly those with a family history of VTE should receive antepartum thromboprophylaxis. Women with low thromboembolic risk or previous VTE caused by a transient risk factor (ie, provoked), who have no family history of VTE, may undergo antepartum surveillance. Postpartum anticoagulation can be considered in women with both high and low thromboembolic risk.

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Grégoire Le Gal ◽  
Patrick Van Dreden ◽  
Luc Bressollette ◽  
Pierre-Yves Scarabin ◽  
...  

SummaryActivated protein C (APC) resistance is the most common risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Previous studies mostly analysed patients under 70 years and reported a four-to sevenfold increased risk. This case-control study included consecutive patients referred for a clinical suspicion VTE to our medical unit: 621 patients with a well-documented diagnosis (cases) and 406 patients for which the diagnosis was ruled out and who had no personal history of VTE (controls). APC resistance related to factor V Leiden was defined by either a positive DNA analysis or a positive STA® Staclot APC-R assay. Under 70 years, APC resistance was associated with a threefold increased risk of VTE (odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0), whereas in patients over 70 years, it appeared to be no longer a strong risk factor (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.7). Age appeared as an effectmeasure modifier with a significant interaction (p = 0.005). Our data suggest that APC resistance is not a risk factor for VTE in elderly.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Larson ◽  
T. L. Lindahl ◽  
C. Andersson ◽  
L. Frison ◽  
D. Gustafsson ◽  
...  

SummaryPatients (n = 1600) from 12 European countries, scheduled for elective orthopaedic hip or knee surgery, were screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations, found in 5.5% and 2.9% of the populations, respectively. All patients underwent prophylactic treatment with one of four doses of melagatran and ximelagatran or dalteparin, starting pre-operatively. Bilateral ascending venography was performed on study day 8-11. The patients were subsequently treated according to local routines and followed for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The composite endpoint of screened deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during prophylaxis did not differ significantly between patients with or without these mutations. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during prophylaxis and follow-up (1.9%) was significantly over-represented among patients with the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (p = 0.0002). A tendency towards increased risk of VTE was found with the Factor V Leiden mutation (p = 0.09). PE were few, but significantly over-represented in both the Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutated patients (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, since 90% of the patients with these genetic risk factors will not suffer a VTE event, a general pre-operative genotyping is, in our opinion, of questionable value.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3973-3973
Author(s):  
Pritesh R. Patel ◽  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
Sunita Nathan ◽  
Griza Decebal ◽  
Rosalind Catchatourian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although much is known about the incidence of hypercoagulable disorders in the Caucasian population, data is lacking in many other racial groups. We therefore retrospectively analyzed charts of all patients referred to our inner city hospital’s general hematology clinic from January 2003 to December 2006 for evaluation of possible hypercoagulable state. Methods: We reviewed charts for all patients referred for investigation of thrombophilia or hypercoagulable state seen in our clinic. Data regarding history of thrombosis was recorded. In the case of venous thromboembolic disease possible precipitants were noted. Demographic data and family history were noted. A clinical diagnosis of hypercoagulability was made based on whether the patient had any of the following: age <40; strong family history of thrombosis; unusual location of thrombosis; 2 or more thrombotic events; lack of precipitant to thrombotic episode. Laboratory data was gathered on the following: factor V leiden mutation; prothrombin gene mutation; MTHFR mutation; antithrombin III levels; protein C and protein S function; antiphospholipid antibodies. Results: 59 patients were referred. Of these 12 patients were excluded from further analysis as the reason for referral was investigation of ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction. Using the above clinical criteria 33 patients were identified as having hypercoagulability. Diagnoses and demographics are noted in tables 1 and 2. Conclusions: Our study illustrates several important practical points about the investigation of hypercoagulable patients. A larger number of protein C or S deficiencies would likely have been diagnosed had these studies been performed prior to starting anticoagulation. Similarly it is likely that the proportion of patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is high as it is possible to test for this condition whilst patients are anticoagulated. It is therefore appropriate that the best time for testing be disseminated more widely to general internal medicine providers. Importantly it appears that certain diagnostic tests would have a much higher yield in minority populations. It is likely that resources would be better allocated if African American patients in particular were tested initially for the antiphospholipid antibodies and activated protein C resistance rather than prothrombin gene mutations or factor V Leiden. Further prospective studies are planned to confirm these findings. Baseline demographics Race Gender Age Male Female <40 years >40 years All patients 12 21 22 11 African American 6 12 11 7 White 3 5 5 3 Hispanic 1 3 4 0 Asian 2 1 2 1 Diagnosis by ethnic group Race Diagnosis Antiphospholipid Protein S def. ATIII def. V Leiden MTHFR Multiple Disorders Unknown No cases of Protein C deficiency or Prothrombin Gene Mutation identified All patients 12 3 3 1 (heterozygous) 1 2 15 African American 5 2 2 0 1 1 9 White 3 0 0 1 (heterozygous) 0 0 4 Hispanic 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 Asian 2 0 0 0 0 0 1


2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Horton ◽  
Valerija Momirova ◽  
Donna Dizon-Townson ◽  
Katharine Wenstrom ◽  
George Wendel ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4720-4720
Author(s):  
Vivek Rashmikant Mehta ◽  
Uzma Khan ◽  
Aparna Basu ◽  
Asif Jan ◽  
Bolanie Gbadamosi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Any inherited or acquired condition that increases the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is considered a thrombophilic disorder. Some examples of inherited causes of thromboembolic disorders are Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL), Prothrombin gene mutation, Protein C deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Protein S deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency (low or dysfunctional). Use of these studies in clinical practice has been questioned. We attempted to identify if there are populations of patients that undergo more inpatient screening for inherited causes of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods Retrospective chart review of patients admitted with PE or DVT in a community teaching hospital between May 2012 and December 2014. Only patients who had DVT confirmed with ultrasound or PE confirmed with CT angiogram or had high probability of PE on V/Q scan were included in the study. Individual charts were reviewed to see if thrombophilia workup was ordered. Results A total of 704 patients with acute venous thromboembolism were identified who met our inclusion criteria for the study. Of this 111 patients (15.76%) had one or more thrombophilia screening studies ordered. Risk factors related to venous thromboembolism were evaluated for all of the 704 patients. In our patient population, patients who were smokers (31% vs 20%), had history of sleep apnea (9% vs 3%), a past medical history (PMH) of VTE (37% vs 25%) or who had a family history (FH) of VTE (11% vs 4%) were more likely to have a thrombophilia workup ordered. Table 2 shows the frequency of individual thrombophilia studies ordered among the 111 patients who had testing performed and table 3 shows distribution of positive results. Table. Test Result Abnormal Test Results ANA 1 Decreased AT III 10 Decreased Protein C 10 Decreased Protein S 7 Increased Homocysteine 6 Factor V Leiden 4 PT Gene Mutation 1 APLA 1 Conclusion The largest numbers of positive test results were noted for Protein C, Protein S and Antithrombin III and these are known to be affected by acute thrombosis and therefore could be false positives. Our study shows that those patients with PMH or FH of VTE were more likely to have thrombophilia studies. There is no consensus opinion as to whether to perform thrombophilia screenings in acute care settings. Given this and the fact that personal or family history of VTE do not usually modify future treatment decisions and that there may be significant number of false positives we do not recommend routine screening in these patient populations. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gouin-Thibault ◽  
R Arkam ◽  
S Nassiri ◽  
A de la Tourette ◽  
J Conard ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Reitter-Pfoertner ◽  
Thomas Waldhoer ◽  
Michaela Mayerhofer ◽  
Ernst Eigenbauer ◽  
Cihan Ay ◽  
...  

SummaryData on the long-term survival following venous thromboembolism (VTE) are rare,and the influence of thrombophilia has not been evaluated thus far. Our aim was to assess thrombophilia-parameters as predictors for long-term survival of patients with VTE. Overall, 1,905 outpatients (99 with antithrombin-, protein C or protein S deficiency, 517 with factor V Leiden, 381 with elevated factor VIII and 160 with elevated homocysteine levels, of these 202 had a combination and 961 had none of these risk factors) were included in the study between September 1, 1994 and December 31, 2007. Retrospective survival analysis showed that a total of 78 patients (4.1%) had died during the analysis period, among those four of definite or possible pulmonary embolism and four of bleeding. In multivariable analysis including age and sex an association with increased mortality was found for hyperhomocysteinemia (hazard ratio 2.0 [1.1.-3.5]) whereas this was not the case for all other investigated parameters. We conclude that the classical hereditary thrombophilia risk factors did not have an impact on the long-term survival of patients with a history of VTE. Thus our study supports the current concept that thrombophilia should not be a determinant for decision on long term anticoagulation. However, hyperhomocysteinaemia, known as a risk factor for recurrent VTE and arterial disease, might impact survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document