Advantages and Disadvantages of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Compared to Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Blake
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis is Better than Automated Peritoneal Dialysis as First-Line Treatment in Renal Replacement Therapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 153-157
Author(s):  
Philip Kam-Tao Li ◽  
Kwok Yi Chung ◽  
Kai Ming Chow
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Residual Renal Function ◽  
Health Care Economics ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies

This article examines the roles of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) as first-line renal replacement therapy. To date, no high-quality large-scale randomized controlled studies have compared CAPD with APD as first-line therapy. However, a discussion on this issue is important so that nephrologists can decide and patients can have a choice of modality on which to start dialysis, especially in the context of health care economics. We review the literature and present Hong Kong as the model of a “CAPD first” policy, an appealing, cost-effective approach for any country. An ideal renal replacement therapy should provide optimal survival, lowest possible risk for comorbidity, highest level of quality of life, and equally important, acceptable cost to society. When we consider this subject in the context that all patients should be started on one first-line modality, the data suggest that a “CAPD first” policy has all these advantages, with APD probably having the edge only with regard to patient preference. The present review highlights preservation of residual renal function, removal and balancing of sodium, incidence of peritonitis, peritoneal membrane transport status, patient rehabilitation, and financial issues in demonstrating that a “CAPD first” policy is the model that should be adopted.

scholarly journals Transperitoneal Calcium Balance in Anuric Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chieko Hamada ◽  
Yasuhiko Tomino
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Biochemical Parameters ◽  
Calcium Balance ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Intact Pth ◽  
Rapid Removal ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Short Time

Backgrounds. Calcium (Ca) and bone metabolism in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients show a remarkable difference depending on dialysis modalities. The levels of serum Ca and phosphate (P) in HD patients fluctuate contributing to the intermittent and rapid removal of plasma solute unlike in CAPD. Characteristics of plasma solute transport in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients are resembled with that in HD. The purpose of the present study was to examine the difference of transperitoneal Ca removal between APD and CAPD anuric patients.Subjects and Methods. Twenty-three APD anuric patients were enrolled in this study. Biochemical parameters responsible for transperitoneal Ca removal in 24-hour and 4-hour peritoneal effluents were analyzed on CAPD and APD.Results. Transperitoneal Ca removal on APD was smaller compared with that on CAPD. The Ca removal was related to the ultrafiltration during short-time dwell. Decrease of the Ca removal during NPD induced by short-time dialysate dwell caused negative or small Ca removal in APD patients. The levels of intact PTH were increased at the end of PET.Conclusion. It appears that short-time dwell and frequent dialysate exchanging might suppress the transperitoneal Ca removal in anuric APD patients.

scholarly journals Similar Survival on Automated Peritoneal Dialysis and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Prospective Cohort

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wieneke Marleen Michels ◽  
Marion Verduijn ◽  
Elisabeth Wilhelmina Boeschoten ◽  
Friedo Wilhelm Dekker ◽  
Raymond Theodorus Krediet
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Similar Survival ◽  
Large Prospective Cohort

scholarly journals Difference in perception of advantages and disadvantages of automated peritoneal dialysis for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a conjoint analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisako Yoshida ◽  
Kazuhiko Tsuruya
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Conjoint Analysis ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Case Vignette ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Maintenance Dialysis

Abstract Background In Japan, only less than 3% of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis select peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the mode of renal replacement therapy. Half of patients undergoing PD use a cycler for automated PD (APD). However, it remains unclear what patients undergoing PD regard as the benefits of APD. The purpose of this study was to objectively clarify what patients undergoing PD regard as the advantages and disadvantages of APD. Methods We designed case simulations that varied according to 6 characteristics of PD, such as the adequacy of dialysis and frequency of bag exchange, and created 16 simulation cards for conjoint analysis. For each case vignette, the respondents were asked to indicate whether they would receive this modality of PD on a 5-point scale. Results Thirty-two patients undergoing PD were recruited for this study and completed conjoint analysis simulation questionnaires. The factor with the highest importance in evaluating the modality of PD was the frequency of bag exchange among all participants. When participants were divided into those undergoing APD and continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), the factor was different between them; that is, the low frequency of bag exchange is regarded as an advantage of APD for patients undergoing APD, while the large-sized cycler device is regarded as a disadvantage of APD for those undergoing CAPD. Conclusions The perception of advantages and disadvantages of APD differed between patients undergoing APD and CAPD; the former focus on the frequency of bag exchange, whereas the latter focused the size of device.

scholarly journals Comparison of sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1011-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarju Raj Singh Maharjan ◽  
Andrew Davenport
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysate ◽  
Hypertonic Glucose ◽  
Sodium Removal

Abstract Background Optimal fluid balance for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients requires both water and sodium removal. Previous studies have variously reported that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) removes more or equivalent amounts of sodium than automated PD (APD) cyclers. We therefore wished to determine peritoneal dialysate losses with different PD treatments. Methods Peritoneal and urinary sodium losses were measured in 24-h collections of urine and PD effluent in patients attending for their first assessment of peritoneal membrane function. We adjusted fluid and sodium losses for CAPD patients for the flush before fill technique. Results We reviewed the results from 659 patients, mean age 57 ± 16 years, 56.3% male, 38.9% diabetic, 24.0% treated by CAPD, 22.5% by APD and 53.5% APD with a day-time exchange, with icodextrin prescribed to 72.8% and 22.7 g/L glucose to 31.7%. Ultrafiltration was greatest for CAPD 650 (300–1100) vs 337 (103–598) APD p < 0.001, vs 474 (171–830) mL/day for APD with a day exchange. CAPD removed most sodium 79 (33–132) vs 23 (− 2 to 51) APD p < 0.001, and 51 (9–91) for APD with a day exchange, and after adjustment for the CAPD flush before fill 57 (20–113), p < 0.001 vs APD. APD patients with a day exchanged used more hypertonic glucose dialysates [0 (0–5) vs CAPD 0 (0–1) L], p < 0.001. Conclusion CAPD provides greater ultrafiltration and sodium removal than APD cyclers, even after adjusting for the flush-before fill, despite greater hypertonic usage by APD cyclers. Ultrafiltration volume and sodium removal were similar between CAPD and APD with a day fill.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document