scholarly journals A 60-Week Prospective RCT of a Self-Management Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Diabetes Mellitus

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 883-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Sajatovic ◽  
Douglas D. Gunzler ◽  
Stephanie W. Kanuch ◽  
Kristin A. Cassidy ◽  
Curtis Tatsuoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Intervention

scholarly journals Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Peer-Delivered and Technology Supported Self-Management Intervention for Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Fortuna ◽  
Peter R. DiMilia ◽  
Matthew C. Lohman ◽  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Cynthia D. Zubritsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Intervention

scholarly journals Text message exchanges between older adults with serious mental illness and older certified peer specialists in a smartphone-supported self-management intervention.

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Fortuna ◽  
John A. Naslund ◽  
Kelly A. Aschbrenner ◽  
Matthew C. Lohman ◽  
Marianne Storm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Text Message ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Peer Specialists

scholarly journals Health Behavior Change Processes Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness Engaged in Illness Self-Management

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232199204
Author(s):  
Anjana Muralidharan ◽  
Amanda Peeples ◽  
Alicia Lucksted
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Health Behavior ◽  
Behavior Change ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Health Behavior Change ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Living Well ◽  
Management Interventions

Self-management interventions promote illness management among adults with chronic health conditions. Little is known regarding the processes by which these interventions have their effects. The present study examined how Living Well, an effective self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness, led to health behavior change in a randomized controlled trial. A convenience subset ( N = 15) of participants completed qualitative interviews regarding the feasibility/acceptability of Living Well. An inductive secondary qualitative analysis, using a combination of interpretive phenomenological and social constructivist approaches, was conducted to examine processes of change. Results indicate that Living Well provided information and knowledge, opportunities for learning from others and real-world practice, and an interpersonally supportive environment. These active ingredients led to enhanced self-awareness, confidence, sense of control, and behavior and health status changes among participants. These findings are considered in the context of prominent behavior change theories such as social cognitive theory and self-regulation.

scholarly journals What Works in a Nurse Led Self-Management Program for Patients with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and Diabetes (DM)

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132
Author(s):  
Carol Blixen ◽  
Stephanie W. Kanuch ◽  
Adam T. Perzynski ◽  
Charles Thomas ◽  
Neal V. Dawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Self Management ◽  
What Works

scholarly journals Pretreatment ethyl glucuronide levels predict response to a contingency management intervention for alcohol use disorders among adults with serious mental illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gerard McDonell ◽  
Emily Leickly ◽  
Sterling McPherson ◽  
Jordan Skalisky ◽  
Katherine Hirchak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Contingency Management ◽  
Alcohol Use Disorders ◽  
Ethyl Glucuronide ◽  
Management Intervention

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Integrated General Medical and Psychiatric Self-Management Interventions for Adults With Serious Mental Illness

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 1213-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Whiteman ◽  
John A. Naslund ◽  
Elizabeth A. DiNapoli ◽  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Stephen J. Bartels
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Interventions

Psychological distress and diabetes self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid serious mental illness

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-223
Author(s):  
Lin-Chuan Wu ◽  
Chien Yu Lai ◽  
Chun-Jen Huang ◽  
Frank Huang-Chih Chou ◽  
Erica TengYuan Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Self Management

Pilot trial of the FOCUS mHealth intervention for veterans with serious mental illness in an outpatient VA setting (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Buck ◽  
Janelle Nguyen ◽  
Shelan Porter ◽  
Dror Ben-Zeev ◽  
Greg R. Reger
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Mhealth Intervention ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
The One ◽  
Specific Implementation ◽  
Serious Mental Illnesses

BACKGROUND Veterans with serious mental illnesses (SMI) face barriers to accessing in-person evidence-based interventions that improve illness management. Mobile health (mHealth) has been demonstrated to be feasible, acceptable, effective, and engaging among individuals with serious mental illness in community mental health settings. mHealth for SMI has not been tested within the VA. OBJECTIVE The present study examined the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of an mHealth intervention for serious mental illness in the context of VA outpatient care. METHODS Seventeen (n = 17) veterans with serious mental illnesses enrolled in a one-month pilot trial of FOCUS, a smartphone-based self-management intervention for serious mental illness. At baseline and post-test they completed measures examining symptoms and functional recovery. Participants provided qualitative feedback related to the usability and acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS Veterans completed on average 85.00 (SD = 96.11) interactions with FOCUS over the one-month intervention period. They reported high satisfaction, usability, and acceptability, with nearly all (n = 16, 94.1%) participants reporting that they would recommend the intervention to a fellow veteran. Qualitative feedback indicated that veterans thought mHealth complemented their existing VA services well and described potential opportunities to adapt FOCUS to specific subpopulations (e.g. combat veterans) as well as specific delivery modalities (e.g. groups). In the one-month period, participants experienced small improvements in self-assessed recovery, auditory hallucinations and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The FOCUS mHealth intervention is feasible, acceptable, and usable among veterans. Future work should develop and examine VA-specific implementation approaches of FOCUS for this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document