Quality of Inpatient Psychiatric Care at VA, Other Government, Nonprofit, and For-Profit Hospitals: A Comparison

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan C. Shields ◽  
Meredith B. Rosenthal
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care ◽  
For Profit

Is Readmission a Valid Indicator of the Quality of Inpatient Psychiatric Care?

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Durbin ◽  
Elizabeth Lin ◽  
Crystal Layne ◽  
Moira Teed
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care

Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Byrne ◽  
Geoffrey R. Hooke ◽  
Andrew C. Page
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care

Applying the Swedish Performance Assessment Framework in practise: assessment of efficiency and quality of psychiatric care

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lindelius ◽  
E Björkenstam ◽  
C Dahlgren ◽  
R Ljung ◽  
C Stefansson
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Assessment Framework

scholarly journals Telepsychiatry adoption across hospitals in the United States: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Li ◽  
Sayward E. Harrison ◽  
Xiaoming Li ◽  
Peiyin Hung
Keyword(s):  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Psychiatric Services ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care

Abstract Background Access to psychiatric care is critical for patients discharged from hospital psychiatric units to ensure continuity of care. When face-to-face follow-up is unavailable or undesirable, telepsychiatry becomes a promising alternative. This study aimed to investigate hospital- and county-level characteristics associated with telepsychiatry adoption. Methods Cross-sectional national data of 3475 acute care hospitals were derived from the 2017 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Generalized linear regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with telepsychiatry adoption. Results About one-sixth (548 [15.8%]) of hospitals reported having telepsychiatry with a wide variation across states. Rural noncore hospitals were less likely to adopt telepsychiatry (8.3%) than hospitals in rural micropolitan (13.6%) and urban counties (19.4%). Hospitals with both outpatient and inpatient psychiatric care services (marginal difference [95% CI]: 16.0% [12.1% to 19.9%]) and hospitals only with outpatient psychiatric services (6.5% [3.7% to 9.4%]) were more likely to have telepsychiatry than hospitals with neither psychiatric services. Federal hospitals (48.9% [32.5 to 65.3%]), system-affiliated hospitals (3.9% [1.2% to 6.6%]), hospitals with larger bed size (Quartile IV vs. I: 6.2% [0.7% to 11.6%]), and hospitals with greater ratio of Medicaid inpatient days to total inpatient days (Quartile IV vs. I: 4.9% [0.3% to 9.4%]) were more likely to have telepsychiatry than their counterparts. Private non-profit hospitals (− 6.9% [− 11.7% to − 2.0%]) and hospitals in counties designated as whole mental health professional shortage areas (− 6.6% [− 12.7% to − 0.5%]) were less likely to have telepsychiatry. Conclusions Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, telepsychiatry adoption in US hospitals was low with substantial variations by urban and rural status and by state in 2017. This raises concerns about access to psychiatric services and continuity of care for patients discharged from hospitals.

scholarly journals Purchasing Quality Nursing Home Care in the Veterans Health Administration

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Orna Intrator ◽  
Edward Alan Miller ◽  
Portia Y Cornell ◽  
Cari Levy ◽  
Christopher W Halladay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Nursing Home Care ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Star Rating ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background and Objectives U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) contract with nursing homes (NHs) in their community to serve Veterans. This study compares the characteristics and performance of Veterans Affairs (VA)-paid and non-VA-paid NHs both nationally and within local VAMC markets. Research Design and Methods VA-paid NHs were identified, characterized, and linked to VAMC markets using data drawn from VA administrative files. NHs in the United States in December 2015 were eligible for the analysis, including. 1,307 VA-paid NHs and 14,253 non-VA-paid NHs with NH Compare measures in 128 VAMC markets with any VA-paid NHs. Measurements were derived from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) five-star rating system, NH Compare. Results VA-paid NHs had more beds, residents per day, and were more likely to be for-profit relative to non-VA-paid NHs. Nationally, the average CMS NH Compare star rating was slightly lower among VA-paid NHs than non-VA-paid NHs (3.05 vs. 3.21, p = .04). This difference was seen in all 3 domains: inspection (3.11 vs. 3.23, p < .001), quality (2.68 vs. 2.83, p < .001), and total nurse staffing (3.36 vs. 3.42, p < .10). There was wide variability across VAMC markets in the ratio of average star rating of VA-paid and non-VA-paid NHs (mean ratio = 0.93, interquartile range = 0.78–1.08). Discussion and Implications With increased community NH use expected following the implementation of the MISSION Act, comparison of the quality of purchased services to other available services becomes critical for ensuring quality, including for NH care. Methods presented in this article can be used to examine the quality of purchased care following the MISSION Act implementation. In particular, dashboards such as that for VA-paid NHs that compare to similar non-VA-paid NHs can provide useful information to quality improvement efforts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document