scholarly journals Development of an Inexpensive Raindrop Size Spectrometer

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1710-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Henson ◽  
Geoff Austin ◽  
Harry Oudenhoven
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Field Work ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Quantitative Relation ◽  
Mountainous Terrain ◽  
Raindrop Size

Abstract The deployment of weather radar, notably in mountainous terrain with many microclimates, requires the use of several or even many drop size spectrometers to provide confidence in the quantitative relation between radar reflectivity and rainfall. While there are several different commercial disdrometers available they are all expensive, large, or fragile, which militates against multiple deployment in the field. The design brief was for a reasonably accurate and sensitive, low-cost and rugged disdrometer to support field work. A design based on piezoceramic disks normally used in hydrophones is described. Calibration and typical field results are presented.

Polarimetric Radar Analysis of Raindrop Size Variability in Maritime and Continental Clouds

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1970-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Wilson ◽  
Charles A. Knight ◽  
Sarah A. Tessendorf ◽  
Courtney Weeks
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Natural Variability ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Cloud Seeding ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Maritime Air

AbstractDuring the Queensland Cloud Seeding Research Program, the “CP2” polarimetric radar parameter differential radar reflectivity Zdr was used to examine the raindrop size evolution in both maritime and continental clouds. The focus of this paper is to examine the natural variability of the drop size distribution. The primary finding is that there are two basic raindrop size evolutions, one associated with continental air masses characterized by relatively high aerosol concentrations and long air trajectories over land and the other associated with maritime air masses with lower aerosol concentrations. The size evolution difference is during the growth stage of the radar echoes. The differential radar reflectivity in the growing continental clouds is dominated by large raindrops, whereas in the maritime clouds differential reflectivity is dominated by small raindrops and drizzle. The drop size evolution in many of the maritime air masses was very similar to those observed in the maritime air of the Caribbean Sea observed with the NCAR S-band polarimetric radar (S-Pol) during the Rain in Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO) experiment. Because the tops of the Queensland continental clouds ascended almost 2 times as fast as the maritime ones in their growth stage, both dynamical and aerosol factors may be important for the systematic difference in drop size evolution. Recommendations are advanced for future field programs to understand better the causes for the observed variability in drop size evolution. Also, considering the natural variability in drop size evolution, comments are provided on conducting and evaluating cloud seeding experiments.

scholarly journals On the Shape–Slope Relation of Drop Size Distributions in Convective Rain

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1146-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Seifert
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Gamma Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Empirical Relation ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Drop Size Distributions ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract The relation between the slope and shape parameters of the raindrop size distribution parameterized by a gamma distribution is examined. The comparison of results of a simple rain shaft model with an empirical relation based on disdrometer measurements at the surface shows very good agreement, but a more detailed discussion reveals some difficulties—for example, deviations from the gamma shape and the overestimation of collisional breakup.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Assumption through Comparison of Rain Rates of Measured and Radar-Equivalent Gamma DSD

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini ◽  
Ali Tokay
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractTo date, one of the most widely used parametric forms for modeling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is the three-parameter gamma. The aim of this paper is to analyze the error of assuming such parametric form to model the natural DSDs. To achieve this goal, a methodology is set up to compare the rain rate obtained from a disdrometer-measured drop size distribution with the rain rate of a gamma drop size distribution that produces the same triplets of dual-polarization radar measurements, namely reflectivity factor, differential reflectivity, and specific differential phase shift. In such a way, any differences between the values of the two rain rates will provide information about how well the gamma distribution fits the measured precipitation. The difference between rain rates is analyzed in terms of normalized standard error and normalized bias using different radar frequencies, drop shape–size relations, and disdrometer integration time. The study is performed using four datasets of DSDs collected by two-dimensional video disdrometers deployed in Huntsville (Alabama) and in three different prelaunch campaigns of the NASA–Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) ground validation program including the Hydrological Cycle in Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) special observation period (SOP) 1 field campaign in Rome. The results show that differences in rain rates of the disdrometer DSD and the gamma DSD determining the same dual-polarization radar measurements exist and exceed those related to the methodology itself and to the disdrometer sampling error, supporting the finding that there is an error associated with the gamma DSD assumption.

scholarly journals Precipitation cloud identification based on faster-RCNN for Doppler weather radar

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanbo Ran ◽  
Haijiang Wang ◽  
Li Tian ◽  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Xiaohong Li
Keyword(s):  
Radial Velocity ◽  
Vertical Direction ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Convective Precipitation ◽  
Horizontal Wind ◽  
Doppler Weather Radar ◽  
Velocity Data ◽  
Precipitation Processes ◽  
Radial Velocity Data

AbstractPrecipitation clouds are visible aggregates of hydrometeor in the air that floating in the atmosphere after condensation, which can be divided into stratiform cloud and convective cloud. Different precipitation clouds often accompany different precipitation processes. Accurate identification of precipitation clouds is significant for the prediction of severe precipitation processes. Traditional identification methods mostly depend on the differences of radar reflectivity distribution morphology between stratiform and convective precipitation clouds in three-dimensional space. However, all of them have a common shortcoming that the radial velocity data detected by Doppler Weather Radar has not been applied to the identification of precipitation clouds because it is insensitive to the convective movement in the vertical direction. This paper proposes a new method for precipitation clouds identification based on deep learning algorithm, which is according the distribution morphology of multiple radar data. It mainly includes three parts, which are Constant Altitude Plan Position Indicator data (CAPPI) interpolation for radar reflectivity, Radial projection of the ground horizontal wind field by using radial velocity data, and the precipitation clouds identification based on Faster-RCNN. The testing result shows that the method proposed in this paper performs better than the traditional methods in terms of precision. Moreover, this method boasts great advantages in running time and adaptive ability.

scholarly journals Radar Quality Index for a Mosaic of Radar Reflectivity over Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand

2020 ◽  
pp. 92-104
Author(s):  
Nattapon Mahavik ◽  
Sarintip Tantanee
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Beam Propagation ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Temporal Information ◽  
Radar Beam ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Chao Phraya River ◽  
Application Fields

The weather radar is one of the tools that can provide spatio-temporal information for nowcast which is useful for hydro-meteorological disasters warning and mitigation system. The ground-based weather radar can provide spatial and temporal information to monitor severe storm over the risky area. However, the usage of multiple radars can provide more effective information over large study area where single radar beam may be blocked by surrounding terrain Even though, the investigation of the sever storm physical characteristics needs the information from multiple radars, the mosaicked radar product has not been available for Thai researcher yet. In this study, algorithm of mosaicked radar reflectivity has been developed by using data from ground-based radar of Thai Meteorological Department over the Chao Phraya river basin in the middle of Thailand. The Python script associated with OpenCV and Wradlib libraries were used in our investigations of the mosaicking processes. The radar quality index (RQI) field has been developed by implementing an equation of a quality radar index to identify the reliability of each mosaicked radar reflectivity pixels. First, the percentage of beam blockage is computed to understand the radar beam propagation obstructed by surrounding topography in order to clarify the limitations of the observed beam on producing radar reflectivity maps. Second, the elevation of beam propagation associated with distance field has been computed. Then, these three parameters and the obtained percentage of beam blockage are utilized as the parameters in the equation of RQI. Finally, the detected radar flare, non-precipitating radar area, has been included to the RQI field. Then, the RQI field has been applied to the extracted radar reflectivity to evaluate the quality of mosaicked radar reflectivity to inform end user in any application fields over the Chao Phraya river basin.

scholarly journals Influence of Disdrometer Type on Weather Radar Algorithms from Measured DSD: Application to Italian Climatology

Atmosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Nicoletta Roberto ◽  
Mario Montopoli ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Radar Meteorology ◽  
Quality Checks ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Drop Size Distributions ◽  
First And Second Generation ◽  
Theoretical Considerations

Relations for retrieving precipitation and attenuation information from radar measurements play a key role in radar meteorology. The uncertainty in such relations highly affects the precipitation and attenuation estimates. Weather radar algorithms are often derived by applying regression methods to precipitation measurements and radar observables simulated from datasets of drop size distributions (DSD) using microphysical and electromagnetic assumptions. DSD datasets can be derived from theoretical considerations or obtained from experimental measurements collected throughout the years by disdrometers. Although the relations obtained from experimental disdrometer datasets can be generally considered more representative of a specific climatology, the measuring errors, which depend on the specific type of disdrometer used, introduce an element of uncertainty to the final retrieval algorithms. Eventually, data quality checks and filtering procedures applied to disdrometer measurements play an important role. In this study, we pursue two main goals: (i) evaluate two different techniques for establishing weather radar algorithms from measured DSD, and (ii) investigate to what extent dual-polarization radar algorithms derived from experimental DSD datasets are influenced by the different error structures introduced by the various disdrometer types (namely 2D video disdrometer, first and second generation of OTT Parsivel disdrometer, and Thies Clima disdrometer) used to collect the data. Furthermore, weather radar algorithms optimized for Italian climatology are presented and discussed.

scholarly journals A Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Variability of Raindrop Size Distributions during Stratiform Rain Events

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choong Ke Lee ◽  
Gyu Won Lee ◽  
Isztar Zawadzki ◽  
Kyung-Eak Kim
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variability ◽  
Characteristic Number ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Number Density ◽  
Ratio Error ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Highly Correlated

Abstract The spatial variability of raindrop size distributions (DSDs) and precipitation fields is investigated utilizing disdrometric measurements from the four Precipitation Occurrence Sensor Systems (POSS) and radar reflectivity fields from S-band dual-polarization radar and vertically pointing X-band radar. The spatial cross correlation of the moments of DSDs, their ratio, error in rainfall estimate, and normalization parameters are quantified using a “noncentered” correlation function. The time-averaged spatial autocorrelation function of observed radar reflectivity factor (Ze) is smaller than that of estimated rainfall rate from Ze because of power-law R–Z transformation with its exponent larger than unity. The important spatial variability of DSDs and rain integral fields is revealed by the significant differences among average DSDs and leads to an average fractional error of 25% in estimating rainfall accumulation during an event. The spatial correlation of the reflectivity from POSS is larger than that of Ze because of larger measurement noise in Ze. The higher moments of DSDs are less correlated in space than lower moments. The correlation of rainfall estimate error is higher than that of estimated rainfall rate and of rainfall rate calculated from DSDs. The correlation of the characteristic number density is low (0.87 at 1.3-km distance), suggesting that the assumed homogeneity of the characteristic number density in space could result in larger errors in the retrieval of DSDs and rain-related parameters. However, the characteristic diameter is highly correlated in space.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document