Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling during Spring Onset

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 4891-4901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert X. Black ◽  
Brent A. McDaniel ◽  
Walter A. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Vortex Breakdown ◽  
Lower Boundary ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Circulation Anomalies

Abstract The authors perform an observational study of the relation between stratospheric final warmings (SFWs) and the boreal extratropical circulation. SFW events are found to provide a strong organizing influence upon the large-scale circulation of the stratosphere and troposphere during the period of spring onset. In contrast to the climatological seasonal cycle, SFW events noticeably sharpen the annual weakening of high-latitude circumpolar westerlies in both the stratosphere and troposphere. A coherent pattern of significant westerly (easterly) zonal wind anomalies is observed to extend from the stratosphere to the earth’s surface at high latitudes prior to (after) SFW events, coinciding with the polar vortex breakdown. This evolution is associated with a bidirectional dynamical coupling of the stratosphere–troposphere system in which tropospheric low-frequency waves induce annular stratospheric circulation anomalies, which in turn, are followed by annular tropospheric circulation anomalies. The regional tropospheric manifestation of SFW events consists of a North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)-like phase transition in the near-surface geopotential height field, with height rises over polar latitudes and height falls over the northeast North Atlantic. This lower-tropospheric change pattern is distinct from the climatological seasonal cycle, which closely follows seasonal trends in thermal forcing at the lower boundary. Although broadly similar, the tropospheric anomaly patterns identified in the study do not precisely correspond to the canonical northern annular mode (NAM) and NAO patterns as the primary anomaly centers are retracted northward toward the pole. The results here imply that (i) high-latitude climate may be particularly sensitive to long-term trends in the annual cycle of the stratospheric polar vortex and (ii) improvements in the understanding and simulation of SFW events may benefit medium-range forecasts of spring onset in the extratropics.

scholarly journals Nonstationarity in Southern Hemisphere Climate Variability Associated with the Seasonal Breakdown of the Stratospheric Polar Vortex

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (18) ◽  
pp. 7125-7139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Byrne ◽  
Theodore G. Shepherd ◽  
Tim Woollings ◽  
R. Alan Plumb
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Vortex Breakdown ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Time Symmetry

Abstract Statistical models of climate generally regard climate variability as anomalies about a climatological seasonal cycle, which are treated as a stationary stochastic process plus a long-term seasonally dependent trend. However, the climate system has deterministic aspects apart from the climatological seasonal cycle and long-term trends, and the assumption of stationary statistics is only an approximation. The variability of the Southern Hemisphere zonal-mean circulation in the period encompassing late spring and summer is an important climate phenomenon and has been the subject of numerous studies. It is shown here, using reanalysis data, that this variability is rendered highly nonstationary by the organizing influence of the seasonal breakdown of the stratospheric polar vortex, which breaks time symmetry. It is argued that the zonal-mean tropospheric circulation variability during this period is best viewed as interannual variability in the transition between the springtime and summertime regimes induced by variability in the vortex breakdown. In particular, the apparent long-term poleward jet shift during the early-summer season can be more simply understood as a delay in the equatorward shift associated with this regime transition. The implications of such a perspective for various open questions are discussed.

scholarly journals The Generic Nature of the Tropospheric Response to Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 5589-5610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian P. White ◽  
Chaim I. Garfinkel ◽  
Edwin P. Gerber ◽  
Martin Jucker ◽  
Peter Hitchcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Latitude ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Momentum Budget ◽  
Free Running ◽  
Eddy Fluxes ◽  
Surface Jet ◽  
Thermally Triggered

AbstractThe tropospheric response to midwinter sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) is examined using an idealized model. SSW events are triggered by imposing high-latitude stratospheric heating perturbations of varying magnitude for only a few days, spun off from a free-running control integration (CTRL). The evolution of the thermally triggered SSWs is then compared with naturally occurring SSWs identified in CTRL. By applying a heating perturbation, with no modification to the momentum budget, it is possible to isolate the tropospheric response directly attributable to a change in the stratospheric polar vortex, independent of any planetary wave momentum torques involved in the initiation of an SSW. Zonal-wind anomalies associated with the thermally triggered SSWs first propagate downward to the high-latitude troposphere after ~2 weeks, before migrating equatorward and stalling at midlatitudes, where they straddle the near-surface jet. After ~3 weeks, the circulation and eddy fluxes associated with thermally triggered SSWs evolve very similarly to SSWs in CTRL, despite the lack of initial planetary wave driving. This suggests that at longer lags, the tropospheric response to SSWs is generic and it is found to be linearly governed by the strength of the lower-stratospheric warming, whereas at shorter lags, the initial formation of the SSW potentially plays a large role in the downward coupling. In agreement with previous studies, synoptic waves are found to play a key role in the persistent tropospheric jet shift at long lags. Synoptic waves appear to respond to the enhanced midlatitude baroclinicity associated with the tropospheric jet shift, and preferentially propagate poleward in an apparent positive feedback with changes in the high-latitude refractive index.

Understanding the role of the troposphere in the surface impact of the 2018 sudden stratospheric warming event

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan J. González-Alemán ◽  
Christian M. Grams ◽  
Blanca Ayarzagüena ◽  
Pablo Zurita-Gotor ◽  
Daniela I. V. Domeisen Domeisen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Vortex Breakdown ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
The North

<p>Sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are impressive phenomena that consist of a rapid stratospheric polar vortex breakdown. SSWs can have a strong impact on the tropospheric weather and are mainly associated with the negative phases of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations (AO, NAO), and with northern European cold outbreaks, thus causing high societal impact. However, the mechanisms behind the downward impact from the stratosphere are insufficiently understood, especially the role played by the troposphere. In this work, we investigate this coupling and its associated predictability limits by studying the 2018 SSW event.</p><p>By analyzing ECMWF 15-day ensemble forecasts and partitioning them into different weather regimes, we search for possible dynamical tropospheric events that may have favored the downward stratosphere-troposphere coupling during and after the SSW. It is found that two cyclogenesis events were the main drivers of the negative NAO pattern associated with a Greenland Blocking, causing a rapid change from prevailing westerlies into a blocked state in the North Atlantic region. Unless these cyclogenesis events are simulated in the forecasts, the prediction of a Greenland Blocking does not become highly prevalent. No important stratospheric differences between WRs were found. A possible oceanic contribution to this blocked state is also found. This work corroborates that individual synoptic events might constitute a “predictability barrier" for subsequent forecast lead times. It also sheds light, on the specific topic of troposphere-stratosphere coupling.</p>

scholarly journals Impact of Synoptic-Scale Wave Breaking on the NAO and Its Connection with the Stratosphere in ERA-40

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 5464-5480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torben Kunz ◽  
Klaus Fraedrich ◽  
Frank Lunkeit
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Wave Breaking ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Synoptic Scale ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Close Link ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Atlantic ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This observational study investigates the impact of North Atlantic synoptic-scale wave breaking on the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and its connection with the stratosphere in winter, as derived from the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40). Anticyclonic (AB) and cyclonic wave breaking (CB) composites are compiled of the temporal and spatial components of the large-scale circulation using a method for the detection of AB and CB events from daily maps of potential vorticity on an isentropic surface. From this analysis a close link between wave breaking, the NAO, and the stratosphere is found: 1) a positive feedback between the occurrence of AB (CB) events and the positive (negative) phase of the NAO is suggested, whereas wave breaking in general without any reference to AB- or CB-like behavior does not affect the NAO, though it preferably emerges from its positive phase. 2) AB strengthens the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and acts to separate it from the subtropical jet, while CB weakens the eddy-driven jet and tends to merge both jets. 3) AB (CB) events are associated with a stronger (weaker) lower-stratospheric polar vortex, characterized by the 50-hPa northern annular mode. During persistent weak vortex episodes, significantly more frequent CB than AB events are observed concurrently with a significant negative NAO response up to 55 days after the onset of the stratospheric perturbation. Finally, tropospheric wave breaking is related to nonannular stratospheric variability, suggesting an additional sensitivity of wave breaking and, thus, the NAO to specific distortions of the stratospheric polar vortex, rather than solely its strength.

The mutual impact of weather regimes and the stratospheric circulation on European surface weather

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian M. Grams ◽  
Remo Beerli ◽  
Dominik Büeler ◽  
Daniela I. V. Domeisen ◽  
Lukas Papritz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Weather Regimes ◽  
The North ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Surface Weather ◽  
The North Atlantic ◽  
Large Scale Flow

<p>Extreme states of the winter stratosphere, such as sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) or an extremely strong stratospheric polar vortex (SPV), can affect surface weather over the North-Atlantic European region on subseasonal time scales. Here we investigate the occurrence of Atlantic-European weather regimes during different stratospheric conditions in winter and their link to large-scale weather events in European sub-regions. We further elucidate if the large-scale flow regime in the North Atlantic at SSW onset determines the subsequent downward impact.</p><p>Anomalous stratospheric conditions modulate the occurrence of weather regimes which project strongly onto the NAO and the likelihood of their associated weather events. In contrast weather regimes which do not project strongly onto the NAO are not affected by anomalous stratospheric conditions. These regimes provide pathways to unexpected weather events in extreme stratospheric polar vortex states. For example, Greenland blocking (GL) and the Atlantic Trough (AT) regime are the most frequent large-scale flow patterns following SSWs. While in Central Europe GL provides a pathway to cold and calm weather, AT provides a pathway to warm and windy weather. The latter weather conditions are usually not expected after an SSW. Furthermore, we find that a blocking situation over western Europe and the North Sea (European Blocking) at the time of the SSW onset favours the GL response and associated cold conditions over Europe. In contrast, an AT response and mild conditions are more likely if GL occurs already at SSW onset. An assessment of forecast performance in ECMWF extended-range reforecasts suggests that the model tends to forecast too cold conditions following weak SPV states.</p><p>In summary, weather regimes and their response to anomalous SPV states importantly modulate the stratospheric impact on European surface weather. In particular the tropospheric impact of SSW events critically depends on the tropospheric state during the onset of the SSW. We conclude that a correct representation of weather regime life cycles in numerical models could provide crucial guidance for subseasonal prediction.</p><p> </p><p>References:</p><p>Beerli, R., and C. M. Grams, 2019: Stratospheric modulation of the large-scale circulation in the Atlantic–European region and its implications for surface weather events. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., <strong>145</strong>, 3732–3750, doi:10.1002/qj.3653.</p><p>Domeisen, D. I. V., C. M. Grams, and L. Papritz, 2020: The role of North Atlantic-European weather regimes in the surface impact of sudden stratospheric warming events. Weather and Climate Dynamics Discussions, 1–24, doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2019-16.</p>

Planetary Wave Breaking and Tropospheric Forcing as Seen in the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of 2006

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Coy ◽  
Stephen Eckermann ◽  
Karl Hoppel
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Wave Breaking ◽  
Potential Temperature ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Sudden Warming ◽  
Advanced Level ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
The North ◽  
Temperature Surface

Abstract The major stratospheric sudden warming (SSW) of January 2006 is examined using meteorological fields from Goddard Earth Observing System version 4 (GEOS-4) analyses and forecast fields from the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System–Advanced Level Physics, High Altitude (NOGAPS-ALPHA). The study focuses on the upper tropospheric forcing that led to the major SSW and the vertical structure of the subtropic wave breaking near 10 hPa that moved low tropical values of potential vorticity (PV) to the pole. Results show that an eastward-propagating upper tropospheric ridge over the North Atlantic with its associated cold temperature perturbations (as manifested by high 360-K potential temperature surface perturbations) and large positive local values of meridional heat flux directly forced a change in the stratospheric polar vortex, leading to the stratospheric subtropical wave breaking and warming. Results also show that the anticyclonic development, initiated by the subtropical wave breaking and associated with the poleward advection of the low PV values, occurred over a limited altitude range of approximately 6–10 km. The authors also show that the poleward advection of this localized low-PV anomaly was associated with changes in the Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux from equatorward to poleward, suggesting an important role for Rossby wave reflection in the SSW of January 2006. Similar upper tropospheric forcing and subtropical wave breaking were found to occur prior to the major SSW of January 2003.

Importance of Stratospheric Polar Vortex Events for Seasonal Predictability of Sea Level Pressure over the North Atlantic and Europe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Baehr ◽  
Simon Wett ◽  
Mikhail Dobrynin ◽  
Daniela Domeisen
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Seasonal Predictability ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Sea Level Pressure ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Atlantic

<p>The downward influence of the stratosphere on the troposphere can be significant during boreal winter when the polar vortex is most variable, when major circulation changes in the stratosphere can impact the tropospheric flow. These strong and weak vortex events, the latter also referred to as Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs), are capable of influencing the tropospheric circulation down to the sea level on timescales from weeks to months. Thus, the occurrence of stratospheric polar vortex events influences the seasonal predictability of sea level pressure (SLP), which is, over the Atlantic sector, strongly linked to the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO).<br>We analyze the influence of the polar vortex on the seasonal predictability of SLP in a seasonal prediction system based on the mixed resolution configuration of the coupled Max-Planck-Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM), where we investigate a 30 member ensemble hindcast simulation covering 1982 -2016. Since the state of the polar vortex is predictable only a few weeks or even days ahead, the seasonal prediction system cannot exactly predict the day of occurrence of stratospheric events. However, making use of the large number of stratospheric polar vortex events in the ensemble hindcast simulation, we present a statistical analysis of the influence of a correct or incorrect prediction of the stratospheric vortex state on the seasonal predictability of SLP over the North Atlantic and Europe.</p>

scholarly journals Seasonal Prediction Skill of Northern Extratropical Surface Temperature Driven by the Stratosphere

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 4463-4475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwei Jia ◽  
Xiaosong Yang ◽  
Gabriel Vecchi ◽  
Richard Gudgel ◽  
Thomas Delworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Northern Eurasia ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Predictive Skill

This study explores the role of the stratosphere as a source of seasonal predictability of surface climate over Northern Hemisphere extratropics both in the observations and climate model predictions. A suite of numerical experiments, including climate simulations and retrospective forecasts, are set up to isolate the role of the stratosphere in seasonal predictive skill of extratropical near-surface land temperature. It is shown that most of the lead-0-month spring predictive skill of land temperature over extratropics, particularly over northern Eurasia, stems from stratospheric initialization. It is further revealed that this predictive skill of extratropical land temperature arises from skillful prediction of the Arctic Oscillation (AO). The dynamical connection between the stratosphere and troposphere is also demonstrated by the significant correlation between the stratospheric polar vortex and sea level pressure anomalies, as well as the migration of the stratospheric zonal wind anomalies to the lower troposphere.

scholarly journals Predictability of the stratospheric polar vortex breakdown: An ensemble reforecast experiment for the splitting event in January 2009

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 3388-3404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Noguchi ◽  
Hitoshi Mukougawa ◽  
Yuhji Kuroda ◽  
Ryo Mizuta ◽  
Shoukichi Yabu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vortex Breakdown ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document