Parameterization of Pressure Perturbations in a PBL Mass-Flux Model

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 1726-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara-Lyn Lappen ◽  
David A. Randall

Abstract In a companion paper, the authors presented a boundary layer parameterization that was based on the mass-flux concept and included an internally consistent representation of the vertical flux of horizontal momentum. In the present paper, the authors show how the framework of that model can be used to determine the perturbation pressure field, by solving the anelastic pressure equation. The pressure covariances needed to close the parameterization can then be diagnosed. Tests show very encouraging agreement of the pressure statistics with results obtained from large-eddy simulations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1618 ◽  
pp. 062038
Author(s):  
Lawrence C. Cheung ◽  
Colleen M. Kaul ◽  
Alan S. Hsieh ◽  
Myra L. Blaylock ◽  
Matthew J. Churchfield

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Ackerman ◽  
Margreet C. vanZanten ◽  
Bjorn Stevens ◽  
Verica Savic-Jovcic ◽  
Christopher S. Bretherton ◽  
...  

Abstract Cloud water sedimentation and drizzle in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer are the focus of an intercomparison of large-eddy simulations. The context is an idealized case study of nocturnal stratocumulus under a dry inversion, with embedded pockets of heavily drizzling open cellular convection. Results from 11 groups are used. Two models resolve the size distributions of cloud particles, and the others parameterize cloud water sedimentation and drizzle. For the ensemble of simulations with drizzle and cloud water sedimentation, the mean liquid water path (LWP) is remarkably steady and consistent with the measurements, the mean entrainment rate is at the low end of the measured range, and the ensemble-average maximum vertical wind variance is roughly half that measured. On average, precipitation at the surface and at cloud base is smaller, and the rate of precipitation evaporation greater, than measured. Including drizzle in the simulations reduces convective intensity, increases boundary layer stratification, and decreases LWP for nearly all models. Including cloud water sedimentation substantially decreases entrainment, decreases convective intensity, and increases LWP for most models. In nearly all cases, LWP responds more strongly to cloud water sedimentation than to drizzle. The omission of cloud water sedimentation in simulations is strongly discouraged, regardless of whether or not precipitation is present below cloud base.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Pedersen ◽  
M. Kelly ◽  
S.-E. Gryning ◽  
R. Floors ◽  
E. Batchvarova ◽  
...  

Abstract. Vertical profiles of the horizontal wind speed and of the standard deviation of vertical wind speed from Large Eddy Simulations of a convective atmospheric boundary layer are compared to wind LIDAR measurements up to 1400 m. Fair agreement regarding both types of profiles is observed only when the simulated flow is driven by a both time- and height-dependent geostrophic wind and a time-dependent surface heat flux. This underlines the importance of mesoscale effects when the flow above the atmospheric surface layer is simulated with a computational fluid dynamics model.


2006 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Beare ◽  
Malcolm K. Macvean ◽  
Albert A. M. Holtslag ◽  
Joan Cuxart ◽  
Igor Esau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document