scholarly journals Biomechanical Glaucoma Factor and Corneal Hysteresis in Treated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Their Associations With Visual Field Progression

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Shuichiro Aoki ◽  
Atsuya Miki ◽  
Takashi Omoto ◽  
Yuri Fujino ◽  
Masato Matsuura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Corneal Hysteresis ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression

Change in Visual Field Progression Following Treatment Escalation in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 875-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Aptel ◽  
Alain M. Bron ◽  
Yves Lachkar ◽  
Cédric Schweitzer
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression ◽  
Treatment Escalation

scholarly journals A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Kitaoka ◽  
Masaki Tanito ◽  
Yu Yokoyama ◽  
Koji Nitta ◽  
Maki Katai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Morphological Parameters ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Visual Field Progression ◽  
Stereo Analysis ◽  
Disc Area

Purpose. The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. Methods. The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results. The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm2 disc area). Conclusion. A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.

scholarly journals Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Ayala
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
T Test ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression ◽  
Exfoliation Glaucoma ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Glaucoma Group

Abstract Background: The present study aimed to compare visual field progression in new-diagnosed exfoliation versus open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods: Retrospective study. The study included patients with new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma. All patients were followed for three years with reliable visual fields. At least five reliable fields were needed for inclusion. Exfoliation and open-angle glaucoma were defined based on the European Glaucoma Society guidelines. Visual field evaluation was performed using the software threshold 24-2 of the Humphrey Field Analysis. Outcomes: Visual field progression. For visual field progression, three different strategies were used: mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and the guided progression analysis (GPA). Results: The study included 128 subjects, of the 54 in the open-angle and 74 in the exfoliation glaucoma group. The MD difference values were higher in the exfoliation (-3.17 dB) than in the primary open-angle (-1.25 dB) glaucoma group in the three-year follow-up period. The difference between groups was significant (t-test, p=<0.001). The difference in VFI was calculated for the three years follow-up period. The difference was higher in the exfoliation (-7.65%) than in the primary open (-1.90%) glaucoma group (t-test, p=<0.001). The GPA showed progression in 58% of cases in exfoliation, and 13% in primary open glaucoma group (Chi-square, p=<0.001). Conclusion: The present study found a more frequent and faster visual field progression in exfoliation than in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. New-diagnosed exfoliation glaucoma patients must be controlled and treated more strictly than primary open-angle glaucoma patients to avoid visual field deterioration.

scholarly journals Is high myopia a risk factor for visual field progression or disk hemorrhage in primary open-angle glaucoma?

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 599-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Nitta ◽  
Kazuhisa Sugiyama ◽  
Ryotaro Wajima ◽  
Gaku Tachibana
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression

scholarly journals Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Ayala
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
T Test ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression ◽  
Exfoliation Glaucoma ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Glaucoma Group

Abstract Background The present study aimed to compare visual field progression in new-diagnosed exfoliation versus open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective study. The study included patients with new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma. All patients were followed for 3 years with reliable visual fields. At least five reliable fields were needed for inclusion. Exfoliation and open-angle glaucoma were defined based on the European Glaucoma Society guidelines. Visual field evaluation was performed using the software threshold 24–2 of the Humphrey Field Analysis. Outcomes: Visual field progression. For visual field progression, three different strategies were used: mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and the guided progression analysis (GPA). Results The study included 128 subjects, of the 54 in the open-angle and 74 in the exfoliation glaucoma group. The MD difference values were higher in the exfoliation (− 3.17 dB) than in the primary open-angle (− 1.25 dB) glaucoma group in the three-year follow-up period. The difference between groups was significant (t-test, p = < 0.001). The difference in VFI was calculated for the 3 years follow-up period. The difference was higher in the exfoliation (− 7.65%) than in the primary open (− 1.90%) glaucoma group (t-test, p = < 0.001). The GPA showed progression in 58% of cases in exfoliation, and 13% in primary open glaucoma group (Chi-square, p = < 0.001). Conclusion The present study found a more frequent and faster visual field progression in exfoliation than in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. New-diagnosed exfoliation glaucoma patients must be controlled and treated more strictly than primary open-angle glaucoma patients to avoid visual field deterioration.

Comment on Cataract Surgery and Rate of Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 216-217
Author(s):  
Shuichiro Aoki ◽  
Hiroshi Murata ◽  
Shunsuke Nakakura ◽  
Yoshitaka Nakao ◽  
Masato Matsuura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Visual Field Progression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document