scholarly journals Amacrine Cells Forming Gap Junctions With Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells: ipRGC Types, Neuromodulator Contents, and Connexin Isoform

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Krystal R. Harrison ◽  
Andrew P. Chervenak ◽  
Sarah M. Resnick ◽  
Aaron N. Reifler ◽  
Kwoon Y. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion

scholarly journals Feedback from retinal ganglion cells to the inner retina

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254611
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Vlasiuk ◽  
Hiroki Asari
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Feature Selectivity ◽  
Chemical Synapses

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are thought to be strictly postsynaptic within the retina. They carry visual signals from the eye to the brain, but do not make chemical synapses onto other retinal neurons. Nevertheless, they form gap junctions with other RGCs and amacrine cells, providing possibilities for RGC signals to feed back into the inner retina. Here we identified such feedback circuitry in the salamander and mouse retinas. First, using biologically inspired circuit models, we found mutual inhibition among RGCs of the same type. We then experimentally determined that this effect is mediated by gap junctions with amacrine cells. Finally, we found that this negative feedback lowers RGC visual response gain without affecting feature selectivity. The principal neurons of the retina therefore participate in a recurrent circuit much as those in other brain areas, not being a mere collector of retinal signals, but are actively involved in visual computations.

scholarly journals Feedback from retinal ganglion cells to the inner retina

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Vlasiuk ◽  
Hiroki Asari
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Feature Selectivity ◽  
Chemical Synapses

AbstractRetinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are thought to be strictly postsynaptic within the retina. They carry visual signals from the eye to the brain, but do not make chemical synapses onto other retinal neurons. Nevertheless, they form gap junctions with other RGCs and amacrine cells, providing possibilities for RGC signals to feed back into the inner retina. Here we identified such feedback circuitry in the salamander and mouse retinas. First, using biologically inspired circuit models, we found mutual inhibition among RGCs of the same type. We then experimentally determined that this effect is mediated by gap junctions with amacrine cells. Finally, we found that this negative feedback lowers RGC visual response gain without affecting feature selectivity. The principal neurons of the retina therefore participate in a recurrent circuit much as those in other brain areas, not being a mere collector of retinal signals, but are actively involved in visual computations.

scholarly journals Expression of a Barhl1a reporter in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and commissural neurons of the developing zebrafish brain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahad Albadri ◽  
Olivier Armant ◽  
Tairi Aljand-Geschwill ◽  
Filippo Del Bene ◽  
Matthias Carl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Commissural Neurons ◽  
Axonal Projections ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

AbstractPromoting the regeneration or survival of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is one focus of regenerative medicine. Homeobox Barhl transcription factors might be instrumental in these processes. In mammals, only barhl2 is expressed in the retina and is required for both subtype identity acquisition of amacrine cells and for the survival of RGCs downstream of Atoh7, a transcription factor necessary for RGC genesis. The underlying mechanisms of this dual role of Barhl2 in mammals have remained elusive. Whole genome duplication in the teleost lineage generated the barhl1a and barhl2 paralogues. In the Zebrafish retina, Barhl2 functions as determinant of subsets of amacrine cells lineally related to RGCs independently of Atoh7. In contrast, barhl1a expression depends on Atoh7 but its expression dynamics and function have not been studied. Here we describe for the first time a Barhl1a:GFP reporter line in vivo showing that Barhl1a turns on exclusively in subsets of RGCs and their post-mitotic precursors. We also show transient expression of Barhl1a:GFP in diencephalic neurons extending their axonal projections as part of the post-optic commissure, at the time of optic chiasm formation. This work sets the ground for future studies on RGC subtype identity, axonal projections and genetic specification of Barhl1a-positive RGCs and commissural neurons.

scholarly journals Gap Junctions Contribute to Differential Light Adaptation across Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells

Neuron ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-228.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Yao ◽  
Jon Cafaro ◽  
Amanda J. McLaughlin ◽  
Friso R. Postma ◽  
David L. Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Light Adaptation ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion

Characterization of Spontaneous Inhibitory Synaptic Currents in Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1752-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Gao ◽  
Samuel M. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Synaptic Vesicles ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Equilibrium Potential ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Light Onset ◽  
Synaptic Currents ◽  
Postsynaptic Currents

Gao, Fan and Samuel M. Wu. Characterization of spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in salamander retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1752–1764, 1998. Spontaneous and light-evoked postsynaptic currents (sPSCs and lePSCs, respectively) in retinal ganglion cells of the larval tiger salamander were recorded under voltage-clamp conditions from living retinal slices. The focus of this study is to characterize the spontaneous inhibitory PSCs (sIPSCs) and their contribution to the light-evoked inhibitory PSCs (leIPSCs) in on-off ganglion cells. sIPSCs were isolated from spontaneous excitatory PSCs (sEPSCs) by application of 10 μM 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) + 50 μM 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). In ∼70% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) completely blocks sIPSCs, suggesting all sIPSCs in these cells are mediated by GABAergic synaptic vesicles and γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptors (GABAergic sIPSCs, or GABAsIPSCs). In the remaining 30% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) blocks 70–98% of the sIPSCs, and the remaining 2–30% are blocked by strychnine (glycinergic sIPSCs, or GLYsIPSCs). GABAsIPSCs occur randomly with an exponentially distributed interval probability density function, and they persist without noticeable rundown over time. The GABAsIPSC frequency is greatly reduced by cobalt, consistent with the idea that they are largely mediated by calcium-dependent vesicular release. GABAsIPSCs in DNQX + AP5 are tetrodotoxin (TTX) insensitive, suggesting that amacrine cells that release GABA under these conditions do not generate spontaneous action potentials. The average GABAsIPSCs exhibited linear current-voltage relation with a reversal potential near the chloride equilibrium potential, and an average peak conductance of 319.67 ± 252.83 (SD) pS. For GLYsIPSCs, the average peak conductance increase is 301.68 ± 94.34 pS. These parameters are of the same order of magnitude as those measured in inhibitory miniature postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) associated with single synaptic vesicles in the CNS. The amplitude histograms of GABAsIPSCs did not exhibit multiple peaks, suggesting that the larger events are not discrete multiples of elementary events (or quanta). We propose that each GABAsIPSC or GLYsIPSC in retinal ganglion cells is mediated by a single or synchronized multiple of synaptic vesicles with variable neurotransmitter contents. In a sample of 16 on-off ganglion cells, the average peak leIPSC (held at 0 mV) at the light onset is 509.0 ± 233.85 pA and that at the light offset is 529.0 ± 339.88 pA. The approximate number of GABAsIPSCs and GLYsIPSCs required to generate the average light responses, calculated by the ratio of the charge (area under current traces) of the leIPSCs to that of the average single sIPSCs, is 118 ± 52 for the light onset, and 132 ± 76 for the light offset.

A quantitative analysis of the effects of excitatory neurotoxins on retinal ganglion cells in the chick

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngoh Ngoh Tung ◽  
Ian G. Morgan ◽  
David Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Chick Retina ◽  
Area 5 ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Displaced Amacrine Cells ◽  
Series Of Experiments

AbstractThe present study examines the differential effects of three excitotoxins, kainic acid (KA), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and α-amino-2,3-amino-2,3-dihydro-5- methyl-3-oxo-4- isoxazolepropanoic acid (AMPA) on neurons within the genglion cell layer (GCL) of the chick retina. Two-day-old chicks were given a single, 5 μl, intravitreal injection of KA, NMDA, or AMPA at a range of doses. Following treatment with 40 nmol KA, there was a 21% loss of neurons in the GCL. At 200 nmol KA, the loss increased to 46%. Exposure to KA eliminated mainly small neurons of soma area 5–15μm2, and medium-sized ganglion cells of soma area 15–25μm2. Large ganglion cells (>25μ,2) remained unaffected. The vast majority of small cells were probably displaced amarcrine cells. At a does of 3000 nmol NMDA, no further loss of cells was evident. Exposure to 200 nmol AMPA resulted in a 30% loss of large and some medium-sized ganglion cells. In a further series of experiments, exposure to excitotoxin was followed by a retinal scratch, which eliminated retinal ganglion cells within the axotomized region. The results indicate that only a small proportion of displaced amacrine cells are destroyed by NMDA and AMPA, whereas virtually all displaced amarine cells are sensitive to KA. The findings of this study indicate the existence of subclasses of ganglion cells with specificity towards different types of excitatory amino acids (EAA).

scholarly journals PTEN Expression Regulates Gap Junction Connectivity in the Retina

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Chen ◽  
Shaghauyegh S. Azar ◽  
Alexander Harris ◽  
Nicholas C. Brecha ◽  
Luis Pérez de Sevilla Müller
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junction ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Dendritic Structure ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Cell Coupling ◽  
Cell Degeneration

Manipulation of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathway has been suggested as a therapeutic approach to treat or prevent vision loss due to retinal disease. In this study, we investigated the effects of deleting one copy of Pten in a well-characterized class of retinal ganglion cells called α-ganglion cells in the mouse retina. In Pten+/– retinas, α-ganglion cells did not exhibit major changes in their dendritic structure, although most cells developed a few, unusual loop-forming dendrites. By contrast, α-ganglion cells exhibited a significant decrease in heterologous and homologous gap junction mediated cell coupling with other retinal ganglion and amacrine cells. Additionally, the majority of OFF α-ganglion cells (12/18 cells) formed novel coupling to displaced amacrine cells. The number of connexin36 puncta, the predominant connexin that mediates gap junction communication at electrical synapses, was decreased by at least 50% on OFF α-ganglion cells. Reduced and incorrect gap junction connectivity of α-ganglion cells will affect their functional properties and alter visual image processing in the retina. The anomalous connectivity of retinal ganglion cells would potentially limit future therapeutic approaches involving manipulation of the Pten pathway for treating ganglion cell degeneration in diseases like glaucoma, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s diseases.

scholarly journals Tbr2-expressing retinal ganglion cells are ipRGCs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chai-An Mao ◽  
Ching-Kang Chen ◽  
Takae Kiyama ◽  
Nicole Weber ◽  
Christopher M. Whitaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Primary Component ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Retinal Neurons ◽  
T Box ◽  
Retinofugal Projections ◽  
A Minor

AbstractThe mammalian retina contains more than 40 retinal ganglion cell (RGC) subtypes based on their unique morphologies, functions, and molecular profiles. Among them, intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs) are the first specified RGC type that emerged from a common pool of retinal progenitor cells. Previous work has shown that T-box transcription factor T-brain 2 (Tbr2) is essential for the formation and maintenance of ipRGCs, and Tbr2-expressing RGCs activate Opn4 expression upon native ipRGC loss, suggesting that Tbr2+ RGCs can serve as a reservoir for ipRGCs. However, the identity of Tbr2+ RGCs has not been fully vetted, and the developmental and molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of native and reservoir ipRGCs remain unclear. Here, we showed that Tbr2-expressing retinal neurons include RGCs and GABAergic displaced amacrine cells (dACs). Using genetic sparse labeling, we demonstrated that the majority of Tbr2+ RGCs are intrinsically photosensitive and morphologically indistinguishable from known ipRGC types and have identical retinofugal projections. Additionally, we found a minor fraction of Pou4f1-expressing Tbr2+ RGCs marks a unique OFF RGC subtype. Most of the Tbr2+ RGCs can be ablated by anti-melanopsin-SAP toxin in adult retinas, supporting that Tbr2+ RGCs contain reservoir ipRGCs that express melanopsin at varying levels. When Tbr2 is deleted in adult retinas, Opn4 expression is diminished followed by the death of Tbr2-deficient cells, suggesting that Tbr2 is essential for both Opn4 expression and ipRGC survival. Finally, Tbr2 extensively occupies multiple T-elements in the Opn4 locus, indicating a direct regulatory role for Tbr2 on Opn4 transcription.Significance statementMelanopsin/Opn4-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) play fundamental roles in non-image forming vision. Previously we identified Tbr2 as the key transcription regulator for the development and maintenance of ipRGCs. To reveal the full identity of Tbr2-expressing retinal neurons and how Tbr2 acts, we generated a novel mouse line to genetically label and study Tbr2-expressing cells. Our in-depth characterizations firmly established that most Tbr2+ RGCs are indeed ipRGCs and that Tbr2 regulates Opn4 transcription, thus place Tbr2-Opn4 transcription regulatory hierarchy as the primary component in the development and maintenance of the non-image forming visual system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document