scholarly journals Comparison of Risk Factor Profiles for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Subtypes Defined by Pattern of Visual Field Loss: A Prospective Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 2439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae H. Kang ◽  
Stephanie J. Loomis ◽  
Bernard A. Rosner ◽  
Janey L. Wiggs ◽  
Louis R. Pasquale
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
A Prospective Study

Severe Myopia as a Risk Factor for Progressive Visual Field Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

1997 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etsuo Chihara ◽  
X. NIL ◽  
Jin Dong ◽  
Yasuyuki Takashima ◽  
Masayuki Akimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Open Angle

Intraocular pressure as a risk factor for visual field loss in pseudoexfoliative and in primary open-angle glaucoma

Ophthalmology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 2225-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A Teus ◽  
Miguel A Castejón ◽  
Miguel A Calvo ◽  
Patricia Pérez—Salaı́ces ◽  
Ana Marcos
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Open Angle

scholarly journals A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Kitaoka ◽  
Masaki Tanito ◽  
Yu Yokoyama ◽  
Koji Nitta ◽  
Maki Katai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Morphological Parameters ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Visual Field Progression ◽  
Stereo Analysis ◽  
Disc Area

Purpose. The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. Methods. The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results. The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm2 disc area). Conclusion. A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document