Impaired Speed Perception but Intact Luminance Contrast Perception in People With One Eye

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 3058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista R. Kelly ◽  
Sarah R. Zohar ◽  
Brenda L. Gallie ◽  
Jennifer K. E. Steeves
Keyword(s):  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Speed Perception ◽  
Contrast Perception

scholarly journals Motion direction, luminance contrast, and speed perception: An unexpected meeting

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Moscatelli ◽  
Barbara La Scaleia ◽  
Myrka Zago ◽  
Francesco Lacquaniti
Keyword(s):  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Speed Perception

scholarly journals More than noise: Context-dependant luminance contrast discrimination in a coral reef fish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric P. van den Berg ◽  
Michelle Hollenkamp ◽  
Laurie J. Mitchell ◽  
Erin J. Watson ◽  
Naomi F. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Bright Spots ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Luminance Discrimination ◽  
Contrast Perception ◽  
Contrast Discrimination ◽  
Contrast Thresholds

AbstractAchromatic (luminance) vision is used by animals to perceive motion, pattern, space and texture. Luminance contrast sensitivity thresholds are often poorly characterised for individual species and are applied across a diverse range of perceptual contexts using over-simplified assumptions of an animal’s visual system. Such thresholds are often estimated using the Receptor Noise Limited model (RNL) using quantum catch values and estimated noise levels of photoreceptors. However, the suitability of the RNL model to describe luminance contrast perception remains poorly tested.Here, we investigated context-dependent luminance discrimination using triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus) presented with large achromatic stimuli (spots) against uniform achromatic backgrounds of varying absolute and relative contrasts. ‘Dark’ and ‘bright’ spots were presented against relatively dark and bright backgrounds. We found significant differences in luminance discrimination thresholds across treatments. When measured using Michelson contrast, thresholds for bright spots on a bright background were significantly higher than for other scenarios, and the lowest threshold was found when dark spots were presented on dark backgrounds. Thresholds expressed in Weber contrast revealed increased contrast sensitivity for stimuli darker than their backgrounds, which is consistent with the literature. The RNL model was unable to estimate threshold scaling across scenarios as predicted by the Weber-Fechner law, highlighting limitations in the current use of the RNL model to quantify luminance contrast perception. Our study confirms that luminance contrast discrimination thresholds are context-dependent and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

scholarly journals Suppression of Luminance Contrast Sensitivity by Weak Color Presentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ippei Negishi ◽  
Keizo Shinomori
Keyword(s):  
Brain Activity ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Psychophysical Experiment ◽  
Dorsal Pathway ◽  
Color System ◽  
Ventral Pathway ◽  
Visual Cortices ◽  
Contrast Perception ◽  
Psychophysical Studies ◽  
Lower Saturation

The results of psychophysical studies suggest that color in a visual scene affects luminance contrast perception. In our brain imaging studies we have found evidence of an effect of chromatic information on luminance information. The dependency of saturation on brain activity in the visual cortices was measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while the subjects were observing visual stimuli consisting of colored patches of various hues manipulated in saturation (Chroma value in the Munsell color system) on an achromatic background. The results indicate that the patches suppressed luminance driven brain activity. Furthermore, the suppression was stronger rather than weaker for patches with lower saturation colors, although suppression was absent when gray patches were presented instead of colored patches. We also measured brain activity while the subjects observed only the patches (on a uniformly black background) and confirmed that the colored patches alone did not give rise to differences in brain activity for different Chroma values. The chromatic information affects the luminance information in V1, since the effect was observed in early visual cortices (V2 and V3) and the ventral pathway (hV4), as well as in the dorsal pathway (V3A/B). In addition, we conducted a psychophysical experiment in which the ability to discriminate luminance contrast on a grating was measured. Discrimination was worse when weak (less saturated) colored patches were attached to the grating than when strong (saturated) colored patches or achromatic patches were attached. The results of both the fMRI and psychophysical experiments were consistent in that the effects of color were greater in the conditions with low saturation colors.

scholarly journals More than noise: context-dependent luminance contrast discrimination in a coral reef fish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus)

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (21) ◽  
pp. jeb232090
Author(s):  
Cedric P. van den Berg ◽  
Michelle Hollenkamp ◽  
Laurie J. Mitchell ◽  
Erin J. Watson ◽  
Naomi F. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Motion Pattern ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Bright Spots ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Luminance Discrimination ◽  
Contrast Perception ◽  
Contrast Discrimination ◽  
Contrast Thresholds

ABSTRACTAchromatic (luminance) vision is used by animals to perceive motion, pattern, space and texture. Luminance contrast sensitivity thresholds are often poorly characterised for individual species and are applied across a diverse range of perceptual contexts using over-simplified assumptions of an animal's visual system. Such thresholds are often estimated using the receptor noise limited model (RNL). However, the suitability of the RNL model to describe luminance contrast perception remains poorly tested. Here, we investigated context-dependent luminance discrimination using triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus) presented with large achromatic stimuli (spots) against uniform achromatic backgrounds of varying absolute and relative contrasts. ‘Dark’ and ‘bright’ spots were presented against relatively dark and bright backgrounds. We found significant differences in luminance discrimination thresholds across treatments. When measured using Michelson contrast, thresholds for bright spots on a bright background were significantly higher than for other scenarios, and the lowest threshold was found when dark spots were presented on dark backgrounds. Thresholds expressed in Weber contrast revealed lower thresholds for spots darker than their backgrounds, which is consistent with the literature. The RNL model was unable to estimate threshold scaling across scenarios as predicted by the Weber–Fechner law, highlighting limitations in the current use of the RNL model to quantify luminance contrast perception. Our study confirms that luminance contrast discrimination thresholds are context dependent and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document