scholarly journals Working memory consolidation delays top-down attentional processing in visual Cortex: A time-resolved fMRI study

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
P. Scalf ◽  
P. Dux ◽  
R. Marois
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 602-602
Author(s):  
J. Todd ◽  
S. W. Han ◽  
S. Harrison ◽  
R. Marois

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2593-2604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige E. Scalf ◽  
Paul E. Dux ◽  
René Marois

The encoding of information from one event into working memory can delay high-level, central decision-making processes for subsequent events [e.g., Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202, 1998, doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0684]. Working memory, however, is also believed to interfere with the deployment of top–down attention [de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803–1806, 2001, doi:10.1126/science.1056496]. It is, therefore, possible that, in addition to delaying central processes, the engagement of working memory encoding (WME) also postpones perceptual processing as well. Here, we tested this hypothesis with time-resolved fMRI by assessing whether WME serially postpones the action of top–down attention on low-level sensory signals. In three experiments, participants viewed a skeletal rapid serial visual presentation sequence that contained two target items (T1 and T2) separated by either a short (550 msec) or long (1450 msec) SOA. During single-target runs, participants attended and responded only to T1, whereas in dual-target runs, participants attended and responded to both targets. To determine whether T1 processing delayed top–down attentional enhancement of T2, we examined T2 BOLD response in visual cortex by subtracting the single-task waveforms from the dual-task waveforms for each SOA. When the WME demands of T1 were high (Experiments 1 and 3), T2 BOLD response was delayed at the short SOA relative to the long SOA. This was not the case when T1 encoding demands were low (Experiment 2). We conclude that encoding of a stimulus into working memory delays the deployment of attention to subsequent target representations in visual cortex.


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1527-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jay Todd ◽  
Suk Won Han ◽  
Stephenie Harrison ◽  
René Marois

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masih Rahmati ◽  
Golbarg T. Saber ◽  
Clayton E. Curtis

Although the content of working memory (WM) can be decoded from the spatial patterns of brain activity in early visual cortex, how populations encode WM representations remains unclear. Here, we address this limitation by using a model-based approach that reconstructs the feature encoded by population activity measured with fMRI. Using this approach, we could successfully reconstruct the locations of memory-guided saccade goals based on the pattern of activity in visual cortex during a memory delay. We could reconstruct the saccade goal even when we dissociated the visual stimulus from the saccade goal using a memory-guided antisaccade procedure. By comparing the spatiotemporal population dynamics, we find that the representations in visual cortex are stable but can also evolve from a representation of a remembered visual stimulus to a prospective goal. Moreover, because the representation of the antisaccade goal cannot be the result of bottom–up visual stimulation, it must be evoked by top–down signals presumably originating from frontal and/or parietal cortex. Indeed, we find that trial-by-trial fluctuations in delay period activity in frontal and parietal cortex correlate with the precision with which our model reconstructed the maintained saccade goal based on the pattern of activity in visual cortex. Therefore, the population dynamics in visual cortex encode WM representations, and these representations can be sculpted by top–down signals from frontal and parietal cortex.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo van Kerkoerle ◽  
Matthew W. Self ◽  
Pieter R. Roelfsema

Abstract Neuronal activity in early visual cortex depends on attention shifts but the contribution to working memory has remained unclear. Here, we examine neuronal activity in the different layers of the primary visual cortex (V1) in an attention-demanding and a working memory task. A current-source density analysis reveales top-down inputs in the superficial layers and layer 5, and an increase in neuronal firing rates most pronounced in the superficial and deep layers and weaker in input layer 4. This increased activity is strongest in the attention task but it is also highly reliable during working memory delays. A visual mask erases the V1 memory activity, but it reappeares at a later point in time. These results provide new insights in the laminar circuits involved in the top-down modulation of activity in early visual cortex in the presence and absence of visual stimuli.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lora Likova ◽  
Laura Cacciamani ◽  
Spero Nicholas ◽  
Kris Mineff

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sizhu Han ◽  
Yixuan Ku

AbstractAttention and working memory (WM) are intertwined core cognitive processes. Through four experiments with 133 participants, we dissociated the impact of two types of covert spatial attention, endogenous vs. exogenous, on visual WM. Behavioral results consistently indicated that exogenous attentional cues were more advantageous than endogenous ones in enhancing the precision of visual WM under load-2, while they equalized under load-4. In addition, physiological and neural data explained the mechanisms. Converging evidence from eye-tracking, electroencephalography, and magnetoencephalography suggested that fast attentional processing induced by exogenous cues lead to early top-down information from the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to sensory cortices. The differential frontal activities were further correlated with the behavioral distinctions between exogenous and endogenous cues, and transcranial magnetic stimulation over DLPFC at the same time period abolished the exogenous advantage. Taken together, traditionally considered bottom-up attentional processing induced by exogenous cues rapidly engages top-down signals from the frontal cortex, which leads to stronger behavioral benefits compared with the benefits produced by endogenous cues under the low load condition.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiina Salminen ◽  
Simone Kuhn ◽  
Torsten Schubert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document