scholarly journals The parallel between reverse-phi and motion aftereffects

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger J. E. Bours ◽  
Marijn C. W. Kroes ◽  
Martin J. M. Lankheet
Keyword(s):  
Motion Aftereffects

Apparent Velocity of Motion Aftereffects in Central and Peripheral Vision

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Wright
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Apparent Velocity ◽  
Real Motion ◽  
Temporal Decay ◽  
Spatial Grain ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Adapting to a drifting grating (temporal frequency 4 Hz, contrast 0.4) in the periphery gave rise to a motion aftereffect (MAE) when the grating was stopped. A standard unadapted foveal grating was matched to the apparent velocity of the MAE, and the matching velocity was approximately constant regardless of the visual field position and spatial frequency of the adapting grating. On the other hand, when the MAE was measured by nulling with real motion of the test grating, nulling velocity was found to increase with eccentricity. The nulling velocity was constant when scaled to compensate for changes in the spatial ‘grain’ of the visual field. Thus apparent velocity of MAE is constant across the visual field, but requires a greater velocity of real motion to cancel it in the periphery. This confirms that the mechanism underlying MAE is spatially-scaled with eccentricity, but temporally homogeneous. A further indication of temporal homogeneity is that when MAE is tracked, by matching or by nulling, the time course of temporal decay of the aftereffect is similar for central and for peripheral stimuli.

Motion aftereffects following inspection of contrarotating stimuli

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2587-2589 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Woolsey ◽  
Colin V. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Motion Aftereffects

scholarly journals The Perceived Direction of Textured Gratings and Their Motion Aftereffects

Perception ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1383-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alais ◽  
Maarten J van der Smagt ◽  
Frans A J Verstraten ◽  
Wim A van de Grind
Keyword(s):  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Circular Aperture ◽  
High Luminance ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Square Wave ◽  
Aperture Problem ◽  
Motion Energy ◽  
Motion Aftereffects ◽  
Do So

The stimuli in these experiments are square-wave luminance gratings with an array of small random dots covering the high-luminance regions. Owing to the texture, the direction of these gratings, when seen through a circular aperture, is disambiguated because the visual system is provided with an unambiguous motion energy. Thus, the direction of textured gratings can be varied independently of grating orientation. When subjects are required to judge the direction of textured gratings moving obliquely relative to their orientation, they can do so accurately (experiment 1). This is of interest because most studies of one-dimensional motion perception have involved (textureless) luminance-defined sine-wave or square-wave gratings, and the perceived direction of these gratings is constrained by the aperture problem to be orthogonal to their orientation. Thus, direction and orientation have often been confounded. Interestingly, when subjects are required to judge the direction of an obliquely moving textured grating during a period of adaptation and then the direction of the motion aftereffect (MAE) immediately following adaptation (experiments 2 and 3), these directions are not directly opposite each other. MAE directions were always more orthogonal to the orientation of the adapting grating than the corresponding direction judgments during adaptation (by as much as 25°). These results are not readily explained by conventional MAE models and possible accounts are considered.

scholarly journals Velocity Dependence of the Interocular Transfer of Dynamic Motion Aftereffects

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3442 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Tao ◽  
Martin J M Lankheet ◽  
Wim A van de Grind ◽  
Richard J A van Wezel
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Interocular Transfer ◽  
Adaptation Stimulus ◽  
Motion Adaptation ◽  
Pixel Array ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Motion Aftereffects ◽  
Measured Strength

It is well established that motion aftereffects (MAEs) can show interocular transfer (IOT); that is, motion adaptation in one eye can give a MAE in the other eye. Different quantification methods and different test stimuli have been shown to give different IOT magnitudes, varying from no to almost full IOT. In this study, we examine to what extent IOT of the dynamic MAE (dMAE), that is the MAE seen with a dynamic noise test pattern, varies with velocity of the adaptation stimulus. We measured strength of dMAE by a nulling method. The aftereffect induced by adaptation to a moving random-pixel array was compensated (nulled), during a brief dynamic test period, by the same kind of motion stimulus of variable luminance signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR). The LSNR nulling value was determined in a Quest-staircase procedure. We found that velocity has a strong effect on the magnitude of IOT for the dMAE. For increasing speeds from 1.5 deg s−1 to 24 deg s−1 average IOT values increased about linearly from 18% to 63% or from 32% to 83%, depending on IOT definition. The finding that dMAEs transfer to an increasing extent as speed increases, suggests that binocular cells play a more dominant role at higher speeds.

Local and Global Properties of Motion Aftereffects

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
N J Wade ◽  
V Pardieu ◽  
M T Swanston
Keyword(s):  
Vision Research ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Test Display ◽  
Adaptation Process ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Motion Adaptation ◽  
Global Properties ◽  
Differential Adaptation ◽  
Induced Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

The local motion adaptation at the basis of the motion aftereffect (MAE) can be expressed in a variety of ways, depending upon the structure of the test display (N J Wade, L Spillmann, M T Swanston Vision Research in press). This has been demonstrated with MAEs from induced motion: if adaptation is to two moving (Surround) gratings, an MAE is seen in the central grating if two gratings surround it, but in the flanking gratings when they are themselves surrounded in the test stimulus. We report two experiments in which the characteristics of the test display and of the local adaptation process have been examined. In experiment 1, five vertical gratings were presented during adaptation; the outermost and central gratings remained stationary and those flanking the centre moved laterally. The test display always consisted of three stationary gratings: either the central three or the lower three equivalent to the locations of the adaptation display. MAEs were only recorded in the Centre and not in the Surround, irrespective of whether the Centre or Surround had been exposed to motion during adaptation. MAEs in the Centre were in opposite directions, reflecting the influence of Surround adaptation. The influence of adapting motion in different directions was examined in experiment 2. The upper grating always received the same direction of motion during adaptation, and the lower grating was absent, stationary, or moving in the same or in the opposite direction. The results indicate that an MAE is visible in the upper grating only after differential adaptation between the upper and lower gratings.

Auditory motion aftereffects with a two‐component adapter

1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2845-2845
Author(s):  
Hisashi Uematsu ◽  
Makio Kashino
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

scholarly journals Maximal motion aftereffects in spite of diverted awareness

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1174-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Blaser ◽  
Tim Shepard
Keyword(s):  
Motion Aftereffects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document