Post-perceptual locus for visual context effects: ERP evidence from the Rod and Frame Illusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 906-906
Author(s):  
J. E. Corbett ◽  
T. C. Handy ◽  
J. T. Enns
Keyword(s):  
Context Effects ◽  
Visual Context ◽  
Perceptual Locus ◽  
Rod And Frame

Auditory–visual context effects in a speech and nonspeech condition

2000 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 2887-2887
Author(s):  
Linda W. Norrix ◽  
Iris Oved ◽  
Lawrence D. Rosenblum
Keyword(s):  
Context Effects ◽  
Visual Context

Auditory‐visual context effects on the perception of voicing

2000 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 2482-2482
Author(s):  
Linda W. Norrix ◽  
Connie Keintz
Keyword(s):  
Context Effects ◽  
Visual Context

Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mick P. Couper ◽  
Frederick G. Conrad ◽  
Roger Tourangeau
Keyword(s):  
Context Effects ◽  
Visual Context ◽  
Web Surveys

scholarly journals Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 404-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Kreyenmeier ◽  
Jolande Fooken ◽  
Miriam Spering
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Hand Movements ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Visual Context ◽  
End Points ◽  
Movement Trajectories ◽  
Trial Basis

In our natural environment, we interact with moving objects that are surrounded by richly textured, dynamic visual contexts. Yet most laboratory studies on vision and movement show visual objects in front of uniform gray backgrounds. Context effects on eye movements have been widely studied, but it is less well known how visual contexts affect hand movements. Here we ask whether eye and hand movements integrate motion signals from target and context similarly or differently, and whether context effects on eye and hand change over time. We developed a track-intercept task requiring participants to track the initial launch of a moving object (“ball”) with smooth pursuit eye movements. The ball disappeared after a brief presentation, and participants had to intercept it in a designated “hit zone.” In two experiments ( n = 18 human observers each), the ball was shown in front of a uniform or a textured background that either was stationary or moved along with the target. Eye and hand movement latencies and speeds were similarly affected by the visual context, but eye and hand interception (eye position at time of interception, and hand interception timing error) did not differ significantly between context conditions. Eye and hand interception timing errors were strongly correlated on a trial-by-trial basis across all context conditions, highlighting the close relation between these responses in manual interception tasks. Our results indicate that visual contexts similarly affect eye and hand movements but that these effects may be short-lasting, affecting movement trajectories more than movement end points. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a novel track-intercept paradigm, human observers tracked a briefly shown object moving across a textured, dynamic context and intercepted it with their finger after it had disappeared. Context motion significantly affected eye and hand movement latency and speed, but not interception accuracy; eye and hand position at interception were correlated on a trial-by-trial basis. Visual context effects may be short-lasting, affecting movement trajectories more than movement end points.

scholarly journals Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

10.3791/57694 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Rodriguez Ronderos ◽  
Katja Münster ◽  
Ernesto Guerra ◽  
Helene Kreysa ◽  
Alba Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Language Comprehension ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
Visual Context
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document