scholarly journals Using multiple-object tracking (MOT) to test whether cerebral hemispheres share common visual attention resources

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
J. Rein ◽  
Z. W. Pylyshyn ◽  
G. Alvarez
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-222
Author(s):  
David J. Harris ◽  
Mark R. Wilson ◽  
Emily M. Crowe ◽  
Samuel J. Vine

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola S. Störmer ◽  
Shu-Chen Li ◽  
Hauke R. Heekeren ◽  
Ulman Lindenberger

Declines in selective attention are one of the sources contributing to age-related impairments in a broad range of cognitive functions. Most previous research on mechanisms underlying older adults' selection deficits has studied the deployment of visual attention to static objects and features. Here we investigate neural correlates of age-related differences in spatial attention to multiple objects as they move. We used a multiple object tracking task, in which younger and older adults were asked to keep track of moving target objects that moved randomly in the visual field among irrelevant distractor objects. By recording the brain's electrophysiological responses during the tracking period, we were able to delineate neural processing for targets and distractors at early stages of visual processing (∼100–300 msec). Older adults showed less selective attentional modulation in the early phase of the visual P1 component (100–125 msec) than younger adults, indicating that early selection is compromised in old age. However, with a 25-msec delay relative to younger adults, older adults showed distinct processing of targets (125–150 msec), that is, a delayed yet intact attentional modulation. The magnitude of this delayed attentional modulation was related to tracking performance in older adults. The amplitude of the N1 component (175–210 msec) was smaller in older adults than in younger adults, and the target amplification effect of this component was also smaller in older relative to younger adults. Overall, these results indicate that normal aging affects the efficiency and timing of early visual processing during multiple object tracking.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hauke S. Meyerhoff ◽  
Frank Papenmeier

Individual differences in attentional abilities provide an interesting approach in studying visual attention as well as the relation of attention to other psychometric measures. However, recent research has demonstrated that many tasks from experimental research are not suitable for individual differences research as they fail to capture these differences reliably. Here, we provide a test for individual differences in visual attention which relies on the multiple object tracking task (MOT). This test captures individual differences reliably in 6-15 minutes. Within the task the participants have to maintain a set of targets (among identical distractors) across an interval of object motion. It captures the efficiency of attentional deployment. Importantly, this test was explicitly designed and tested for reliability under conditions that match those of most laboratory research (restricted sample of students, approximately n = 50). The test is free to use and runs fully under open source software. In order to facilitate the application of the test, we have translated it into 16 common languages (Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish). The test can be downloaded at https://osf.io/qy6nb/. We hope that this MOT test supports researchers whose field of study requires capturing individual differences in visual attention reliably.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas S. Bland ◽  
Jason B. Mattingley ◽  
Martin V. Sale

ABSTRACTOur ability to track the paths of multiple visual objects moving between the hemifields requires effective integration of information between the two cerebral hemispheres. Coherent neural oscillations in the gamma band (35–70 Hz) are hypothesised to drive this information transfer. Here we manipulated the need for interhemispheric integration using a novel multiple object tracking (MOT) task in which stimuli either moved between the two visual hemifields—requiring interhemispheric integration—or moved within separate visual hemifields. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure interhemispheric coherence during the task. Human observers (21 female; 20 male) were poorer at tracking objects between-versus within-hemifields, reflecting a cost of interhemispheric integration. Critically, gamma coherence was greater in trials requiring interhemispheric integration, particularly between sensors over parieto-occipital areas. In approximately half of the participants, the observed cost of integration was associated with a failure of the cerebral hemispheres to become coherent in the gamma band. Moreover, individual differences in this integration cost correlated with endogenous gamma coherence at these same sensors, though with generally opposing relationships for the real and imaginary part of coherence. The real part (capturing synchronisation with a near-zero phase-lag) benefited between-hemifield tracking; imaginary coherence was detrimental. Finally, instantaneous phase-coherence over the tracking period uniquely predicted between-hemifield tracking performance, suggesting that effective integration benefits from sustained interhemispheric synchronisation. Our results show that gamma coherence mediates interhemispheric integration during MOT, and add to a growing body of work demonstrating that coherence drives communication across cortically distributed neural networks.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1282-1282
Author(s):  
A. Tran ◽  
J. Hoffman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document