scholarly journals The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 210c
Author(s):  
Chris Paffen ◽  
Jim Maarseveen ◽  
Frans AJ Verstraten ◽  
Hinze Hogendoorn
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Duration

Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations.

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Birngruber ◽  
Hannes Schröter ◽  
Emanuel Schütt ◽  
Rolf Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Duration

scholarly journals Speed or duration? Effects of implicit stimulus attributes on perceived duration

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Linda von Sobbe ◽  
Claudia Maienborn ◽  
Fabiola Reiber ◽  
Edith Scheifele ◽  
Rolf Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Duration

Spatial Effects on Temporal Categorisation

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p6165 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 748-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Ève Roussel ◽  
Simon Grondin ◽  
Peter Killeen
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Processing ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Vertical Plane ◽  
Spatial Effects ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Spatial Factors ◽  
Upper Visual Field ◽  
Sensitivity Level ◽  
Marking Time ◽  
Perceived Duration

We examined the influence of spatial factors in temporal processing. Participants categorised as short or long empty intervals marked by two brief flashes delivered from locations differing in height and depth (experiment 1), or from two of three locations on a vertical plane (experiment 2). The perceived duration of intervals, as determined by the point of subjective equality, was affected by the height and depth of the signals (experiment 1). Experiment 2 showed that the point of fixation plays a critical role in perceived duration. The duration of an interval located in the upper visual field is perceived as longer when participants fixate the higher visual source and shorter when the fixation point is set in the middle; this latter result also generally applies when the fixation point is in the lower source. Finally, for the sensitivity level, there was a significant segment (upper versus lower) × direction (descending versus ascending) interaction in experiment 1; a similar interaction effect varied according to the fixation point in experiment 2. In experiment 2, the Weber fractions were around 0.22. Most results can be explained in terms of the need to shift attention from one visual source—for marking time intervals—to another.

Perceived duration of auditory oddballs: test of a novel pitch-window hypothesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 915-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Kim Fromboluti ◽  
J. Devin McAuley
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Duration

scholarly journals Perceptual Content, Not Physiological Signals, Determines Perceived Duration When Viewing Dynamic, Natural Scenes

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Suárez-Pinilla ◽  
Kyriacos Nikiforou ◽  
Zafeirios Fountas ◽  
Anil K. Seth ◽  
Warrick Roseboom
Keyword(s):  
Time Perception ◽  
Physiological Signals ◽  
Perceptual Content ◽  
Natural Scenes ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Recent Proposal ◽  
Physiological Factors ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Scene Content ◽  
Perceived Duration

The neural basis of time perception remains unknown. A prominent account is the pacemaker-accumulator model, wherein regular ticks of some physiological or neural pacemaker are read out as time. Putative candidates for the pacemaker have been suggested in physiological processes (heartbeat), or dopaminergic mid-brain neurons, whose activity has been associated with spontaneous blinking. However, such proposals have difficulty accounting for observations that time perception varies systematically with perceptual content. We examined physiological influences on human duration estimates for naturalistic videos between 1–64 seconds using cardiac and eye recordings. Duration estimates were biased by the amount of change in scene content. Contrary to previous claims, heart rate, and blinking were not related to duration estimates. Our results support a recent proposal that tracking change in perceptual classification networks provides a basis for human time perception, and suggest that previous assertions of the importance of physiological factors should be tempered.

Contrast Influences Perceived Duration of Brief Time Intervals

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 682-684
Author(s):  
Ted Jaeger ◽  
Jennifer Lang
Keyword(s):  
Time Intervals ◽  
Perceived Duration
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document