scholarly journals Differential processing delays cause the onset of the rod-and-frame illusion to precede the onset of the frame

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 789
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Peterson ◽  
Paul Dassonville
Keyword(s):  
Differential Processing ◽  
Rod And Frame

Differential processing of melodic, rhythmic and simple tone deviations in musicians -an MEG study

NeuroImage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 898-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Lappe ◽  
Markus Lappe ◽  
Christo Pantev
Keyword(s):  
Differential Processing

Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Turconi ◽  
Boutheina Jemel ◽  
Bruno Rossion ◽  
Xavier Seron
Keyword(s):  
Differential Processing ◽  
Electrophysiological Evidence

Age Effects in the Processing of Typical and Distinctive Faces

1995 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Johnston ◽  
Hadyn D. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Age Effects ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Cognitive Architectures ◽  
Differential Processing ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Adults And Children

Two experiments exploring the differential processing of distinctive and typical faces by adults and children are reported. Experiment 1 employed a recognition memory task. On three out of four dimensions of measurement, children of 5 years of age did not show an advantage for distinctive faces, whereas older children and adults did. In Experiment 2, however, subjects of all ages classified typical faces faster than distinctive ones in a face/non-face decision task: the 5-year-olds performed exactly as did adults and older children. The different patterns in performance between these two tasks are discussed in relation to possible cognitive architectures for the way young children represent faces in memory. Specifically, we examine two alternative architectures proposed by Ellis (1992) as precursors for Valentine's (1991a) multidimensional adult face-space and discuss whether implementations of these spaces should be based on a norm-based or an exemplar-based framework.

Field Independence and Resistance to Reversal of Perspective

1966 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Haronian ◽  
A. Arthur Sugerman
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Necker Cube ◽  
Normal Male ◽  
Field Independence ◽  
Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Following Instructions ◽  
Independence Results ◽  
Male University Students ◽  
Rod And Frame Test ◽  
Rod And Frame

The more successful 102 normal male university students were in following instructions to resist fluctuations of the Necker cube, the more field-independently they scored on both Series III of the rod-and-frame test ( r = .28) and on Jackson's short form of the embedded-figures test ( r = .24). Under neutral instructions, the correlations were nil. Results support prior findings that a small but significant portion of the variance of Necker cube fluctuations under instructions to control the rate of shift is related to scores of field independence. Results support Jackson's finding that ability to control the rate of shift is not related to intelligence.

EFFECTS OF CONGRUENCE-INCONGRUENCE BETWEEN LOCUS OF CONTROL AND FIELD DEPENDENCE ON INTERPERSONAL BEHAVIOR

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy B. Ehrlich ◽  
Andrew Broughton ◽  
Glen M. Vaught
Keyword(s):  
Locus Of Control ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Interpersonal Behavior ◽  
Interpersonal Distance ◽  
Social Stimuli ◽  
Control Scale ◽  
Perceptual Skills ◽  
Interpersonal Needs ◽  
Report Measure ◽  
Rod And Frame

Lefcourt and Telegdi's concepts of congruence and incongruence between perceptual skills and expectancies were examined with respect to interpersonal behavior. Four groups of subjects were formed using a portable rod-and-frame device and Rotter's locus of control scale. As predicted the two congruent groups used significantly less interpersonal distance with each of four different social stimuli as measured by Duke and Nowicki's comfortable interpersonal distance scale. There was no difference between congruent and incongruent groups on a self-report measure of interpersonal needs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document