scholarly journals Distractor specificity leads to contextual cueing effects in target-absent search condition

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 642
Author(s):  
Jeunghwan Choi ◽  
Sang Chul Chong
Author(s):  
Angela A. Manginelli ◽  
Franziska Geringswald ◽  
Stefan Pollmann

When distractor configurations are repeated over time, visual search becomes more efficient, even if participants are unaware of the repetition. This contextual cueing is a form of incidental, implicit learning. One might therefore expect that contextual cueing does not (or only minimally) rely on working memory resources. This, however, is debated in the literature. We investigated contextual cueing under either a visuospatial or a nonspatial (color) visual working memory load. We found that contextual cueing was disrupted by the concurrent visuospatial, but not by the color working memory load. A control experiment ruled out that unspecific attentional factors of the dual-task situation disrupted contextual cueing. Visuospatial working memory may be needed to match current display items with long-term memory traces of previously learned displays.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Poulet ◽  
Andre Didierjean ◽  
Eric Ruthruff ◽  
Annabelle Goujon
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalliu C. Couto ◽  
Victor M. Navarro ◽  
Tatiana R. Smith ◽  
Edward A. Wasserman

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 2295-2313
Author(s):  
Yoko Higuchi ◽  
Yoshiyuki Ueda ◽  
Kazuhisa Shibata ◽  
Jun Saiki

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 768-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Riddle ◽  
Kai Hwang ◽  
Dillan Cellier ◽  
Sofia Dhanani ◽  
Mark D'Esposito

Beta and gamma frequency neuronal oscillations have been implicated in top–down and bottom–up attention. In this study, we used rhythmic TMS to modulate ongoing beta and gamma frequency neuronal oscillations in frontal and parietal cortex while human participants performed a visual search task that manipulates bottom–up and top–down attention (single feature and conjunction search). Both task conditions will engage bottom–up attention processes, although the conjunction search condition will require more top–down attention. Gamma frequency TMS to superior precentral sulcus (sPCS) slowed saccadic RTs during both task conditions and induced a response bias to the contralateral visual field. In contrary, beta frequency TMS to sPCS and intraparietal sulcus decreased search accuracy only during the conjunction search condition that engaged more top–down attention. Furthermore, beta frequency TMS increased trial errors specifically when the target was in the ipsilateral visual field for the conjunction search condition. These results indicate that beta frequency TMS to sPCS and intraparietal sulcus disrupted top–down attention, whereas gamma frequency TMS to sPCS disrupted bottom–up, stimulus-driven attention processes. These findings provide causal evidence suggesting that beta and gamma oscillations have distinct functional roles for cognition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Shi ◽  
X. Zang ◽  
L. Jia ◽  
T. Geyer ◽  
H. J. Muller
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document