scholarly journals Saliency capture, contingent capture and onset capture in visual search and spatial cueing

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 466
Author(s):  
Stefanie Becker ◽  
Courtney Judd
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Contingent Capture ◽  
Spatial Cueing

scholarly journals Visual attention in spatial cueing and visual search

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jongsoo Baek ◽  
Barbara Anne Dosher ◽  
Zhong-Lin Lu
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Visual Attention ◽  
Spatial Cueing

Auditory Spatial Cueing in Visual Search Tasks: Effects of Amplitude, Contrast and Duration

1995 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Z. Strybel ◽  
Jan M. Boucher ◽  
Greg E. Fujawa ◽  
Craig S. Volp
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Search Performance ◽  
Spatial Cues ◽  
Spatial Cueing ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
Auditory Spatial Cues

The effectiveness of auditory spatial cues in visual search performance was examined in three experiments. Auditory spatial cues are more effective than abrupt visual onsets when the target appears in the peripheral visual field or when the contrast of the target is degraded. The duration of the auditory spatial cue did not affect search performance.

Spatial Cueing and the Relation between the Accuracy of “Where” and “What” Decisions in Visual Search

1989 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermann J. Müller ◽  
Patrick M. A. Rabbitt
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Shape Analysis ◽  
Target Localization ◽  
Target Orientation ◽  
Spatial Cueing ◽  
Localization Accuracy ◽  
Accurate Localization ◽  
Orientation Experiment ◽  
Candidate Location ◽  
Accurate Matching

To study the processes underlying selective attention in visual search, the relation between the accuracy of “where” (location) and “what” (same/different orientation matching) decisions was analysed under various display conditions. Target-non-target discriminability was varied by contrasting single and multiple element displays; further, attention was directly manipulated by spatial cueing. In Experiment 1, analyses for both single and multiple displays showed that localization accuracy remained above chance when same/different matching failed; the inverse also obtained. It seems that accurate matching is not a prerequisite for target localization, nor is accurate localization a prerequisite for same/different matching. However, localization is a prerequisite for the accurate recognition of target orientation (Experiment 2). In this case, it seems that features critical for localization “call” attention to a particular candidate location. This facilitates further (shape) analysis of the stimulus that is found there. This orienting process is by-passed if attention is cued to the location in advance.

Contralesional spatial bias in chronic hemianopia: the role of (ec)centric fixation, spatial cueing and visual search

Neuroscience ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 118-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kuhn ◽  
P. Bublak ◽  
U. Jobst ◽  
A. Rosenthal ◽  
S. Reinhart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Spatial Bias ◽  
Spatial Cueing

scholarly journals Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1327-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. C. Russell ◽  
Melina A. Kunar
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Spatial Cueing ◽  
Low Prevalence

Visual Search for a Tilted Target: Tests of Spatial Uncertainty Models

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Morgan ◽  
R.M. Ward ◽  
E. Castet
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Spatial Uncertainty ◽  
Focused Attention ◽  
Spatial Cueing ◽  
Uncertainty Model ◽  
Coarse Texture ◽  
Winner Takes All ◽  
Uncertainty Models

We report that spatial cueing of a parafoveal target in the presence of distractors enhances orientational acuity for that target. When no distractors were present, orientation thresholds were in the range 1–4°. For long exposure times, distractors increased threshold by the amount predicted from a winner-takes-all spatial uncertainty model. For short (100-msec) exposures followed by a random dot mask, the rise in threshold with distractors was considerably greater than that predicted from spatial uncertainty. For brief exposures the effect of distractors was greater when the target and distractors were spatially crowded rather than widely spaced. Adding a tilt to the distractors in the opposite direction to the target increased thresholds still further. Cueing the target with a spatial pointer decreased the effect of distractors, even when they were crowded. We suggest that when attention cannot be appropriately focused, discrimination is carried out by a relatively coarse texture analyser, which averages over several elements, and that focused attention permits the analysis of the target over a smaller area of space.

Auditory Spatial Cueing of Visual Search in the Presence of Noise

2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Thomas Z. Strybel ◽  
Kim-Phuong L. Vu ◽  
Janet T. Castagna-Osorio
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Spatial Cueing

The Influences of Goal and Laterality of a Prepared Hand Response on a Co-Occurring Visual Search

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Coutté ◽  
Gérard Olivier ◽  
Sylvane Faure
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Visual Target ◽  
Motor Planning ◽  
Search Performance ◽  
Response Preparation ◽  
Manual Response ◽  
Response Hand ◽  
Computer Screen ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Manual Interaction

Computer use generally requires manual interaction with human-computer interfaces. In this experiment, we studied the influence of manual response preparation on co-occurring shifts of attention to information on a computer screen. The participants were to carry out a visual search task on a computer screen while simultaneously preparing to reach for either a proximal or distal switch on a horizontal device, with either their right or left hand. The response properties were not predictive of the target’s spatial position. The results mainly showed that the preparation of a manual response influenced visual search: (1) The visual target whose location was congruent with the goal of the prepared response was found faster; (2) the visual target whose location was congruent with the laterality of the response hand was found faster; (3) these effects have a cumulative influence on visual search performance; (4) the magnitude of the influence of the response goal on visual search is marginally negatively correlated with the rapidity of response execution. These results are discussed in the general framework of structural coupling between perception and motor planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document