scholarly journals Peripheral Cueing of Attention: No Selective Attention Capture by Top-Down Matching Singleton Cues in the Presence of Top-down Matching Non-Singletons

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 461
Author(s):  
Tobias Schoeberl ◽  
Florian Goller ◽  
Ulrich Ansorge
Neuron ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochem van Kempen ◽  
Marc A. Gieselmann ◽  
Michael Boyd ◽  
Nicholas A. Steinmetz ◽  
Tirin Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 2069-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H.A.H. Jacobs ◽  
Remco Renken ◽  
Andre Aleman ◽  
Frans W. Cornelissen
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 947
Author(s):  
Dick Dubbelde ◽  
Adam Greenberg
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jochem van Kempen ◽  
Marc A. Gieselmann ◽  
Michael Boyd ◽  
Nicholas A. Steinmetz ◽  
Tirin Moore ◽  
...  

AbstractSpontaneous fluctuations in cortical excitability influence sensory processing and behavior. These fluctuations, long known to reflect global changes in cortical state, were recently found to be modulated locally within a retinotopic map during spatially selective attention. We found that periods of vigorous (On) and faint (Off) spiking activity, the signature of cortical state fluctuations, were coordinated across brain areas along the visual hierarchy and tightly coupled to their retinotopic alignment. During top-down attention, this interareal coordination was enhanced and progressed along the reverse cortical hierarchy. The extent of local state coordination between areas was predictive of behavioral performance. Our results show that cortical state dynamics are shared across brain regions, modulated by cognitive demands and relevant for behavior.One Sentence SummaryInterareal coordination of local cortical state is retinotopically precise and progresses in a reverse hierarchical manner during selective attention.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1224-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Rutman ◽  
Wesley C. Clapp ◽  
James Z. Chadick ◽  
Adam Gazzaley

Selective attention confers a behavioral benefit on both perceptual and working memory (WM) performance, often attributed to top–down modulation of sensory neural processing. However, the direct relationship between early activity modulation in sensory cortices during selective encoding and subsequent WM performance has not been established. To explore the influence of selective attention on WM recognition, we used electroencephalography to study the temporal dynamics of top–down modulation in a selective, delayed-recognition paradigm. Participants were presented with overlapped, “double-exposed” images of faces and natural scenes, and were instructed to either remember the face or the scene while simultaneously ignoring the other stimulus. Here, we present evidence that the degree to which participants modulate the early P100 (97–129 msec) event-related potential during selective stimulus encoding significantly correlates with their subsequent WM recognition. These results contribute to our evolving understanding of the mechanistic overlap between attention and memory.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 282
Author(s):  
Bartlett A. H. Russell ◽  
Alessandro Prosacco ◽  
Bradley D. Hatfield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document