scholarly journals The Role of Microsaccades in the Snellen Acuity Test

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 920
Author(s):  
Janis Intoy ◽  
Michele Rucci
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 145a
Author(s):  
Janis Intoy ◽  
Michele A Cox ◽  
Michele Rucci

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 (04) ◽  
pp. 502-505
Author(s):  
Noemie Schwob ◽  
Anja Palmowski-Wolfe

Abstract Objective Investigating the correlation between subjective and objective VA (visual acuity) elicited with a newly developed computerised optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) suppression test (“SpeedWheel”) in adults. Methods SpeedWheel presented alternating black/white stripes moving horizontally across a LED screen. Seven VA steps were induced with Bangerter filters placed onto spectacle frames. Magnified eye movements were projected from infrared cameras inside the frames and displayed onto a smartphone. Dots whose size increased in logarithmic steps were superimposed to suppress OKN. Suppression of OKN resulted in the SpeedWheel acuity which was then correlated to Snellen acuity as measured with the Freiburg Acuity test. Results 28 eyes from 14 individuals were tested. FrACT-E correlated well to SpeedWheel (r: 0.89; p < 0.001). Snellen acuity was never lower than 0.14 LogMAR of SpeedWheel values. Bangerter filters showed greater mean difference to both methods indicating that this filter is not as predictable as suggested by the filter value. Conclusion SpeedWheel offers a fast (< 80 sec) and reliable alternative option to measure objective VA.


Author(s):  
Magdalena Laura Luethy ◽  
Andreas Schötzau ◽  
Anja Palmowski-Wolfe

Abstract Background The SpeedWheel (SW) test is an objective test of visual acuity (VA) using suppression of the optokinetic nystagmus (OKN). Here, we established prediction intervals of the SW measures compared to Snellen acuity in adults and children. Subjects and Methods In this prospective, single center study, subjects aged at least 4 years underwent testing of VA with SW, Landolt-C, and Tumbling-E symbols (Freiburg acuity test: FrACT-C, FrACT-E). Prediction intervals were established for SW compared to FrACT-C or -E and for FrACT-E compared to FrACT-C. Mixed linear effect models were applied for statistical analysis. Results From 241 subjects, 471 eyes were included: median age 36 years, range 4 – 88 years, 43.6% male, 56.4% female. Eyes included were either healthy or had various underlying ophthalmic conditions. Prediction intervals for SW to estimate FrACT-C or -E acuity showed a similar range compared to the prediction interval of FrACT-C for the estimation of FrACT-E acuity. For each acuity step, there was no influence of age. Up to an SW acuity of 0.7 logMAR, 80% of the subjects had a FrACT-C acuity that was at most 1.6 logMAR lines below, and for an SW acuity of 1.0 logMAR, FrACT-C acuity was not worse than 4 logMAR lines. Prediction intervals for eyes with refractive error, cataract, visual field loss and retinal disease did not differ significantly from healthy eyes in contrast to eyes with amblyopia or multiple ophthalmic disorders. SW correlated well to FrACT tests and results of a previous study fell within our prediction estimates. Conclusion Our prediction intervals for SW acuity may be used to estimate Snellen acuity (FrACT-C and -E) in the clinic in adults and children unable to cooperate in other acuity testing.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Whiten

Abstract The authors do the field of cultural evolution a service by exploring the role of non-social cognition in human cumulative technological culture, truly neglected in comparison with socio-cognitive abilities frequently assumed to be the primary drivers. Some specifics of their delineation of the critical factors are problematic, however. I highlight recent chimpanzee–human comparative findings that should help refine such analyses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Parr

Abstract This commentary focuses upon the relationship between two themes in the target article: the ways in which a Markov blanket may be defined and the role of precision and salience in mediating the interactions between what is internal and external to a system. These each rest upon the different perspectives we might take while “choosing” a Markov blanket.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document