scholarly journals Tracking choices before they are made: Saccadic decisions bias perceptual selection

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1049
Author(s):  
Anna Klapetek ◽  
Donatas Jonikaitis
Keyword(s):  
Perceptual Selection

Perceptual Selection and Integration

Ergonomics ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. WELFORD
Keyword(s):  
Perceptual Selection

Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wendt ◽  
Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez ◽  
Andrea Kiesel ◽  
Thomas Jacobsen
Keyword(s):  
Perceptual Selection

scholarly journals Dynamics of Active Sensing and perceptual selection

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E Schroeder ◽  
Donald A Wilson ◽  
Thomas Radman ◽  
Helen Scharfman ◽  
Peter Lakatos
Keyword(s):  
Active Sensing ◽  
Perceptual Selection

scholarly journals Implicit multisensory statistical learning influences visual perceptual selection

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1025-1025
Author(s):  
E. Piazza ◽  
R. Denison ◽  
M. Schram ◽  
M. Silver
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Learning ◽  
Perceptual Selection

scholarly journals Contextual processing modulates hemispheric differences in visual perceptual selection

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1041
Author(s):  
Elise Piazza ◽  
Karen Wong ◽  
Michael Silver
Keyword(s):  
Hemispheric Differences ◽  
Contextual Processing ◽  
Perceptual Selection

Perceptual selection in dichotic listening

1981 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-200
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Hede
Keyword(s):  
Dichotic Listening ◽  
Perceptual Selection

Working Memory Selection and Competition between Target and Distractor Representations

2008 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanzhen Zhang ◽  
Yingchun Du ◽  
John X. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Directed Forgetting ◽  
Selection Task ◽  
The Other ◽  
Memory Scanning ◽  
Research Participants ◽  
Selection Research ◽  
Perceptual Selection

A working memory selection task combining directed-forgetting and memory-scanning paradigms was used to test the hypothesis that difficulty in selecting target from distractor items in working memory depends on the competition between target and distractor representations, as is commonly assumed in perceptual selection research. Participants memorized two trigrams and were then cued to select one as the new memory set and forget the other. They later saw a test letter and made judgment as to whether the letter was in the selected trigram, i.e., the new memory set. Selection difficulty was examined by manipulating the type of selection cues and the time the cue could be utilized. While re-presenting the targets in the cue display facilitated selection, re-presenting distractors did not impede selection. The results suggest that working memory selection may depend more on the activation from representations of the target than of the distractor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document