scholarly journals Differential effects of reduced contrast on perception of self-motion vs. object-motion

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 949-949
Author(s):  
D. A. Owens ◽  
J. Gu ◽  
R. Patterson
Keyword(s):  
Object Motion ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
Self Motion

scholarly journals Stimulus Eccentricity and Spatial Frequency Interact to Determine Circular Vection

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1067-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Palmisano ◽  
Barbara Gillam
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Optic Flow ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Frequency Pattern ◽  
Circular Vection ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Stimulus Eccentricity

While early research suggested that peripheral vision dominates the perception of self-motion, subsequent studies found little or no effect of stimulus eccentricity. In contradiction to these broad notions of ‘peripheral dominance’ and ‘eccentricity independence’, the present experiments showed that the spatial frequency of optic flow interacts with its eccentricity to determine circular vection magnitude—central stimulation producing the most compelling vection for high-spatial-frequency stimuli and peripheral stimulation producing the most compelling vection for lower-spatial-frequency stimuli. This interaction appeared to be due, in part at least, to the effect that the higher-spatial-frequency moving pattern had on subjects’ ability to organise optic flow into related motion about a single axis. For example, far-peripheral exposure to this high-spatial-frequency pattern caused many subjects to organise the optic flow into independent local regions of motion (a situation which clearly favoured the perception of object motion not self-motion). It is concluded that both high-spatial-frequency and low-spatial-frequency mechanisms are involved in the visual perception of self-motion—with their activities depending on the nature and eccentricity of the motion stimulation.

Torsional eye movements are facilitated during perception of self-motion

1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. V. Thilo ◽  
Thomas Probst ◽  
Adolfo M. Bronstein ◽  
Yatsuji Ito ◽  
Michael A. Gresty
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
Self Motion

scholarly journals An integrated neural model of robust self-motion and object motion perception in visually realistic environments

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 294a
Author(s):  
Scott T Steinmetz ◽  
Oliver W Layton ◽  
N. Andrew Browning ◽  
Nathaniel V Powell ◽  
Brett R Fajen
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Neural Model ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Self Motion

Perception of Self-Motion From Peripheral Optokinetic Stimulation Suppresses Visual Evoked Responses to Central Stimuli

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 723-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai V. Thilo ◽  
Andreas Kleinschmidt ◽  
Michael A. Gresty
Keyword(s):  
Optical Flow ◽  
Functional Neuroimaging ◽  
Stimulus Change ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Peripheral Stimulus ◽  
Optokinetic Stimulation ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Visual Evoked

In a previous functional neuroimaging study we found that early visual areas deactivated when a rotating optical flow stimulus elicited the illusion of self-motion (vection) compared with when it was perceived as a moving object. Here, we investigated whether electrical cortical responses to an independent central visual probe stimulus change as a function of whether optical flow stimulation in the periphery induces the illusion of self-motion or not. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were obtained in response to pattern-reversals in the central visual field in the presence of a constant peripheral large-field optokinetic stimulus that rotated around the naso-occipital axis and induced intermittent sensations of vection. As control, VEPs were also recorded during a stationary peripheral stimulus and showed no difference than those obtained during optokinetic stimulation. The VEPs during constant peripheral stimulation were then divided into two groups according to the time spans where the subjects reported object- or self-motion, respectively. The N70 VEP component showed a significant amplitude reduction when, due to the peripheral stimulus, subjects experienced self-motion compared to when the peripheral stimulus was perceived as object-motion. This finding supplements and corroborates our recent evidence from functional neuroimaging that early visual cortex deactivates when a visual flow stimulus elicits the illusion of self-motion compared with when the same sensory input is interpreted as object-motion. This dampened responsiveness might reflect a redistribution of sensorial and attentional resources when the monitoring of self-motion relies on a sustained and veridical processing of optic flow and may be compromised by other sources of visual input.

Orientation of Selective Effects of Body Tilt on Visually Induced Perception of Self-Motion

1998 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Nakamura ◽  
Shinsuke Shimojo
Keyword(s):  
Body Posture ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Vestibular Information ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Selective Effects

We examined the effect of body posture upon visually induced perception of self-motion (vection) with various angles of observer's tilt. The experiment indicated that the tilted body of observer could enhance perceived strength of vertical vection, while there was no effect of body tilt on horizontal vection. This result suggests that there is an interaction between the effects of visual and vestibular information on perception of self-motion.

scholarly journals Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Tremblay ◽  
Andrew Kennedy ◽  
Dany Paleressompoulle ◽  
Liliane Borel ◽  
Laurence Mouchnino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Acceleration ◽  
Acceleration And Deceleration ◽  
Perception Of Self ◽  
Self Motion
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document