scholarly journals Practice Reduces the Effect of a Ponzo Illusion on Precision Grasping but not Manual Estimation

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1093-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Whitwell ◽  
G. Buckingham ◽  
P. A. Chouinard ◽  
J. M. Mikkila ◽  
S. Fortunato ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Prinzmetal ◽  
Arthur P. Shimamura ◽  
Michelle Mikolinski

1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. L. Bayne ◽  
Roger T. Davis

1971 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Farquhar ◽  
Herschel W. Leibowitz

Author(s):  
Po-Tsun Chen ◽  
Hsiu-Yun Hsu ◽  
You-Hua Su ◽  
Chien-Ju Lin ◽  
Hsiao-Feng Chieh ◽  
...  

Objective To investigate the digit force control during a five-digit precision grasp in aligned (AG) and unaligned grasping (UG) configurations. Background The effects of various cylindrical handles for tools on power grasp performance have been previously investigated. However, there is little information on force control strategy of precision grasp to fit various grasping configurations. Method Twenty healthy young adults were recruited to perform a lift-hold-lower task. The AG and UG configurations on a cylindrical simulator with force transducers were adjusted for each individual. The applied force and moment, the force variability during holding, and force correlations between thumb and each finger were measured. Result No differences in applied force, force correlation, repeatability, and variability were found between configurations. However, the moments applied in UG were significantly larger than those in AG. Conclusion The force control during precision grasp did not change significantly across AG and UG except for the digit moment. The simulator is controlled efficiently with large moment during UG, which is thus the optimal configuration for precision grasping with a cylindrical handle. Further research should consider the effects of task type and handle design on force control, especially for individuals with hand disorders. Application To design the handle of specific tool, one should consider the appropriate configuration according to the task requirements of precision grasping to reduce the risk of accumulating extra loads on digits with a cylindrical handle.


2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1896-1911
Author(s):  
Leo Poom

AbstractExplanations of the Ponzo size illusion, the simultaneous contrast illusion, and the Craik-O’Brien-Cornsweet brightness illusions involve either stimulus-driven processes (assimilation, enhanced contrast, and anchoring) or prior experiences. Real-world up-down asymmetries for typical direction of illumination and ground planes in our physical environment should influence these illusions if they are experience based, but not if they are stimulus driven. Results presented here demonstrate differences in illusion strengths between upright and inverted versions of all three illusions. A left-right asymmetry of the Cornsweet illusion was produced by manipulating the direction of illumination, providing further support for the involvement of an experience-based explanation. When the inducers were incompatible with the targets being located at the different distances, the Ponzo illusion persisted and so did the influence from orientation, providing evidence for involvement of processes other than size constancy. As defined here, upright for the brightness illusions is consistent with an interpretation of a shaded bulging surface and a 3D object resulting from a light-from-above assumption triggering compensation for varying illumination. Upright for the Ponzo illusion is consistent with the inducers in the form of converging lines being interpreted as railway tracks receding on the ground triggering size constancy effects. The implications of these results, and other results providing evidence against experience-based accounts of the illusions, are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Olivier ◽  
Marco Davare ◽  
Michael Andres ◽  
Luciano Fadiga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document