Estimating Crop Leaf Area Index at Different Spatial Scales Based on Statistical Distribution Theory

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-608
Author(s):  
Jihua Wang ◽  
Yingying Dong ◽  
Haikuan Feng ◽  
Guijun Yang ◽  
Xingang Xu
2014 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Tang ◽  
Matthew Brolly ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Alan H. Strahler ◽  
Crystal L. Schaaf ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
I. Kalisperakis ◽  
Ch. Stentoumis ◽  
L. Grammatikopoulos ◽  
K. Karantzalos

The indirect estimation of leaf area index (LAI) in large spatial scales is crucial for several environmental and agricultural applications. To this end, in this paper, we compare and evaluate LAI estimation in vineyards from different UAV imaging datasets. In particular, canopy levels were estimated from i.e., (<i>i</i>) hyperspectral data, (<i>ii</i>) 2D RGB orthophotomosaics and (<i>iii</i>) 3D crop surface models. The computed canopy levels have been used to establish relationships with the measured LAI (ground truth) from several vines in Nemea, Greece. The overall evaluation indicated that the estimated canopy levels were correlated (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> > 73%) with the in-situ, ground truth LAI measurements. As expected the lowest correlations were derived from the calculated greenness levels from the 2D RGB orthomosaics. The highest correlation rates were established with the hyperspectral canopy greenness and the 3D canopy surface models. For the later the accurate detection of canopy, soil and other materials in between the vine rows is required. All approaches tend to overestimate LAI in cases with sparse, weak, unhealthy plants and canopy.


Geosciences ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico Frischbier ◽  
Katharina Tiebel ◽  
Alexander Tischer ◽  
Sven Wagner

(1) Background: Leaf area index (LAI) is an essential structural property of plant canopies and is functionally related to fluxes of energy, water, carbon, and light in ecosystems; coupling the biosphere to the geo-, hydro-, and atmosphere. There is an increasing need for more accurate and traceable measurements among several spatial scales of investigation and modelling. We hypothesize that the spatial variability of LAI at the scale of crown sections of a single European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree in a highly structured, mixed European beech-Norway spruce stand can be determined by simultaneous records of precipitation; (2) Methods: Spatially explicit measurements of throughfall were conducted repeatedly below beech and in forest gaps for rain events in leafed and in leafless periods. Subsequent analysis with a new regression approach resulted in estimating leaf and twig water storage capacities (SCleaf/twig) at point level independent of within-crown lateral flow mechanisms. Inverse modelling was used to estimate spatial litterfall (n = 99) distribution and litter production (mass, area, numbers) for single trees, as a function of diameter at breast height; (3) Results: As revealed by a linear mixed-effects model, SCleaf at the center of a beech canopies amounts to 4.9 mm in average and significantly decreases in the direction of the crown edges to an average value of 1.1 mm. Based on diameter-sensitive prediction of litter production, specific leaf area wetting capacity amounts to 0.260 l·m−2. A linear within-canopy dynamic of LAI was found with a mean of 17.6 m2·m−2 in the center and 4.0 m2·m−2 at the edges; and (4) Conclusions: The application of the method provided plausible results and can be extended to further throughfall datasets and tree species. Unravelling the causes and magnitude of spatial- and temporal heterogeneity of forest ecosystem properties contribute to overall progress in geosciences by improving the understanding how the biosphere relates to the hydro- and atmosphere.


Polar Record ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (177) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Shippert ◽  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
Nancy A. Auerbach ◽  
Brad E. Lewis

AbstractA new emphasis on understanding natural systems at large spatial scales has led to an interest in deriving ecological variables from satellite reflectance images. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is a measure of canopy greenness that can be derived from reflectances at near-infrared and red wavelengths. For this study we investigated the relationships between NDVI and leaf-area index (LAI), intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR), and biomass in an Arctic tundra ecosystem. Reflectance spectra from a portable field spectrometer, LAI, IPAR, and biomass data were collected for 180 vegetation samples near Toolik Lake and Imnavait Creek, Alaska, during July and August 1993. NDVI values were calculated from red and near-infrared reflectances of the field spectrometer spectra. Strong linear relationships are seen between mean NDVI for major vegetation categories and mean LAI and biomass. The relationship between mean NDVI and mean IPAR for these categories is not significant. Average NDVI values for major vegetation categories calculated from a SPOT image of the study area were found to be highly linearly correlated to average field NDVI measurements for the same categories. This indicates that in this case it is appropriate to apply equations derived for field-based NDVI measurements to NDVI images. Using the regression equations for those relationships, biomass and LAI images were calculated from the SPOT NDVI image. The resulting images show expected trends in LAI and biomass across the landscape.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 2764
Author(s):  
John S. Iiames ◽  
Ellen Cooter ◽  
Andrew N. Pilant ◽  
Yang Shao

Modeled leaf area index (LAI) in conjunction with satellite-derived LAI data streams may be used to support various regional and local scale air quality models for retrospective and future meteorological assessments. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model holds promise for providing LAI within a dynamic range for input into climate and air quality models, improving on current LAI distribution assumptions typical within atmospheric modeling. To assess the potential use of EPIC LAI, we first evaluated the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LAI product collections 5 and 6 (i.e., Mc5, Mc6) with in situ LAI estimates upscaled at four 1.0 km resolution research sites distributed over the Albemarle-Pamlico Basin in North Carolina and Virginia, USA. We then compared the EPIC modeled 12.0 km resolution LAI to aggregated MODIS LAI (Mc5, Mc6) over a 3 × 3 grid (or 36 km × 36 km) centered over the same four research sites. Upscaled in situ LAI comparison with MODIS LAI showed improvement with the newer collection where the Mc5 overestimate of +2.22 LAI was reduced to +0.97 LAI with the Mc6. On three of the four sites, the EPIC/MODIS LAI comparison at 12.0 km resolution grid showed similar weighted mean LAI differences (LAI 1.29–1.34), with both Mc5 and Mc6 exceeding EPIC LAI across most dates. For all four research sites, both MODIS collections showed a positive bias when compared to EPIC LAI, with Mc6 (LAI = 0.40) aligning closer to EPIC than the Mc5 (LAI = 0.61) counterpart. Despite modest differences between both MODIS collections and EPIC LAI, the overestimation trend suggests the potential for EPIC to be used for future meteorological alternative management applications on a regional or national scale.


Beskydy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Homolová ◽  
Růžena Janoutová ◽  
Petr Lukeš ◽  
Jan Hanuš ◽  
Jan Novotný ◽  
...  

Remote sensing offers an effective way of mapping vegetation parameters in a spatially continuous manner, at larger spatial scales and repeatedly in time compared to traditional in situ mapping approaches that are typically accurate, but limited to a few distributed location and few repetitions. In case of forest ecosystems, remote sensing allow to assess quantitative parameters or indicators related to forest health status such as leaf area index, leaf pigment content, chlorophyll fluorescence, etc. Development, calibration and validation of remote sensing-based methods, however, still rely on supportive in situ data. The aim of this contribution is to introduce the individual in situ components in the framework for the retrieval of forest quantitative parameters from airborne imaging spectroscopy data. All measurements were acquired during an extensive in situ/flight campaign that took place at the Norway spruce dominated study site Bílý Kříž (Moravian-Silesian Beskydy Mts., Czech Republic) during August 2016. In addition to airborne remote sensing data acquisition, the in situ activities included terrestrial laser scanning for tree 3D modelling, measurements of needle biochemical and optical properties, leaf area index measurements and spectral measurements of various natural and artificial surfaces. Leaf pigments varied between 25.2 and 49.1 µg cm-2 for chlorophyll a+b content, 4.9 – 10.6 µg cm-2 for carotenoid content depending on needle age and its adaptation to sun illumination, whereas ratio between the two pigments was stable around 4.6 – 5. 3. Specific leaf area of spruce needles varied between 49.3 and 105.8 cm2 g-1, being the highest for the shade adapted needles of the current year. Leaf area index of spruce stands of various age and densities varied between 5.3 and 9. 3.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 2934
Author(s):  
Jin Xu ◽  
Lindi J. Quackenbush ◽  
Timothy A. Volk ◽  
Jungho Im

Leaf area index (LAI) is an important vegetation leaf structure parameter in forest and agricultural ecosystems. Remote sensing techniques can provide an effective alternative to field-based observation of LAI. Differences in canopy structure result in different sensor types (active or passive), platforms (terrestrial, airborne, or satellite), and models being appropriate for the LAI estimation of forest and agricultural systems. This study reviews the application of remote sensing-based approaches across different system configurations (passive, active, and multisource sensors on different collection platforms) that are used to estimate forest and crop LAI and explores uncertainty analysis in LAI estimation. A comparison of the difference in LAI estimation for forest and agricultural applications given the different structure of these ecosystems is presented, particularly as this relates to spatial scale. The ease of use of empirical models supports these as the preferred choice for forest and crop LAI estimation. However, performance variation among different empirical models for forest and crop LAI estimation limits the broad application of specific models. The development of models that facilitate the strategic incorporation of local physiology and biochemistry parameters for specific forests and crop growth stages from various temperature zones could improve the accuracy of LAI estimation models and help develop models that can be applied more broadly. In terms of scale issues, both spectral and spatial scales impact the estimation of LAI. Exploration of the quantitative relationship between scales of data from different sensors could help forest and crop managers more appropriately and effectively apply different data sources. Uncertainty coming from various sources results in reduced accuracy in estimating LAI. While Bayesian approaches have proven effective to quantify LAI estimation uncertainty based on the uncertainty of model inputs, there is still a need to quantify uncertainty from remote sensing data source, ground measurements and related environmental factors to mitigate the impacts of model uncertainty and improve LAI estimation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document