scholarly journals The Bulgarian-Romanian language boundary: anthroponymical data

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
Красимира [Krasimira] Колева [Koleva]
Keyword(s):  
Contact Zone ◽  
Danube River ◽  
The Danube River ◽  
Family Names ◽  
Common Area ◽  
The Common

The Bulgarian-Romanian language boundary: anthroponymical dataThe topic is Balkan anthroponymy. The area is the Lower Danube – the Bulgarian-Romanian language boundary. In this contact zone there is a distribution of family names, formed from urbonyms. They signal a specific regional belonging, and they show the link with the common area: the Danube river. We are referring to family names of the type: Vidinliev, Kalafatov, Beketov, Svishtovliev, Ruschukliev, Kalarashev, Tutrakanov, (meaning ‘from Vidin’, ‘from Calafat’, ‘from Bechet’, ‘from Svishtov’, ‘from Ruse’, ‘from Calarashi’, ‘from Tutrakan’). This phenomenon is widespread on both banks of the river. Bułgarsko-rumuńska granica językowa. Dane antroponimiczneArtykuł dotyczy bałkańskiej antroponimii w regionie dolnego Dunaju, stanowiącego bułgarsko-rumuńską granicę i jednocześnie strefę kontaktu. W tym regionie częste są nazwiska derywowane od nazw miejscowości. Sygnalizują one pochodzenie, wskazując jednocześnie na rodowód miejscowy, tj. z regionu naddunajskiego. Są to nazwiska takie jak: Vidinliev, Kalafatov, Beketov, Svištovliev, Rusčukliev, Kalarašev, Tutrakanov (oznaczające: 'z Vidinu, z Kalafatu, z Svištova, z Ruse, z Kalaraši, z Tutrakanu'). Zjawisko to występuje po obu stronach Dunaju.

Metal Accumulation in Muscle and Liver of the Common Nase (Chondrostoma nasus) and Vimba Bream (Vimbavimba) from the Danube River, Serbia: Bioindicative Aspects

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srđan Subotić ◽  
Željka Višnjić-Jeftić ◽  
Vesna Đikanović ◽  
Slađana Spasić ◽  
Jasmina Krpo-Ćetković ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metal Accumulation ◽  
Danube River ◽  
The Danube River ◽  
Chondrostoma Nasus ◽  
The Common

scholarly journals eDNA metabarcoding survey of fish communities in the Danube and its tributaries

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Pont ◽  
Paul Meulenbroek ◽  
Vinzenz Bammer ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Tibor Eros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Ecological Status ◽  
River Mouth ◽  
Danube River ◽  
Farmed Fish ◽  
The Danube River ◽  
Cottus Gobio ◽  
The Common

In complement to the JDS4 traditional fish survey (TFS, mainly by electrofishing), a fish eDNA metabarcoding-based survey has been implemented within the framework of the monitoring program organized by DNAqua-Net and in collaboration with the INTERREG "MEASURES" program. Water samples were collected at 29 sites from the source to the mouth of the Danube River, and at 18 tributaries. Two water samples (mean volume 29 L per sample) were collected at each site and the water filtered in situ. Twelve PCR replicates were performed per sample using teleo primers. In total, 80 taxa were detected, of which 19 corresponded mainly to farmed fish or food fish due to eDNA release in waste waters, most often downstream of large cities. Of the remaining 61 taxa, 50 taxa were identified at the species level, six taxa at the genus level, and five taxa at a higher taxonomic level. Concerning the Danube river itself, 69 and 57 species/markers were detected along the Danube River by TFS and eDNA surveys, respectively. 50 of these taxa were detected by both methods. Nine species were captured by TFS alone, mainly due to gaps in reference librairies and too colosely related barcodes. Eight species were only detected by eDNA. Except for the Salvelinus group, these were all benthic species, which are difficult to catch by electrofishing in large rivers (Acipenser ruthenus, Acipenser stellatus, Benthophilus sp., Romanogobio uranoscopus, Sabanejewia balcanica, Umbra krameri). The species richness tended to increase from upstream to downstream and the relative number of DNA sequences per taxa showed a clear succession of species along the river. Barbatula barbatula, Cottus gobio, Hucho hucho, Lampletra planeri, Phoxinus phoxinus and Thymallus thymallus were restricted to the Upper Danube whereas A. ruthenus, Neogobius fluviatilis, S. balcanica and Scardinius erythrophtalmus were detected from Vienna to the Danube river mouth. Abramis brama, Alburnus alburnus, Cyprinus carpio, Silurus glanis, Sander spp, Zingel streber were detected all along the river course; Alosa spp. and Syngnathus abaster downstream from the Iron Gate; A. stellatus and U. krameri only on the most downstream site (Danube delta). The calculation of a fish index, based on the common metrics used to intercalibrate national fish assessment methods on a European scale, classified most of the sites as being in moderate ecological status. Comparison of the indicative ecological status calculated using the same assessment method based on TSF and eDNA data at the common Danube sites showed a similar classification for six of the 13 sites and a difference of one class for the remaining seven sites.

Toward a Speech Sciences Community

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Donald Finan ◽  
Stephen M. Tasko
Keyword(s):  
Science Research ◽  
Knowledge Generation ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Mandated Curriculum ◽  
Professional Discipline ◽  
Common Area ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Common ◽  
Speech Science

The history of speech-language pathology as a profession encompasses a tradition of knowledge generation. In recent years, the quantity of speech science research and the presence of speech scientists within the domain of the American Speech-Hearing-Language Association (ASHA) has diminished, even as ASHA membership and the size of the ASHA Convention have grown dramatically. The professional discipline of speech science has become increasingly fragmented, yet speech science coursework is an integral part of the mandated curriculum. Establishing an active, vibrant community structure will serve to aid researchers, educators, and clinicians as they work in the common area of speech science.

Mollusks of the Genus Corbicula in the Ukrainian Section of the Danube River

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Makovskiy ◽  
A. V. Lyashenko
Keyword(s):  
Danube River ◽  
The Danube River
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document