scholarly journals Recurrent common bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation with or without precut sphincterotomy

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Hidejiro Urakami ◽  
Kouichi Aiura ◽  
Yoshio Matsui ◽  
Yasushi Iwasaki ◽  
Kouichiro Kumai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Precut Sphincterotomy ◽  
Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation

scholarly journals P.14.10 ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATATION FOR LARGE COMMON BILE DUCT STONES

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. S191
Author(s):  
M. Zippi ◽  
C. Cassieri ◽  
I. De Felici ◽  
R. Pica ◽  
G. Traversa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation

Sequential Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation Following Limited Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1578-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kochhar ◽  
Usha Dutta ◽  
Rajat Shukla ◽  
Birinder Nagi ◽  
Kartar Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for common bile duct stones

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1045-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Yasuda ◽  
Eiichi Tomita ◽  
Hisataka Moriwaki ◽  
Tomohiro Kato ◽  
Tatsuo Wakahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation

scholarly journals Consequences of Stenting and Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation in Treatment of Large and Multiple Common Bile Duct Stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Ahmad Hormati ◽  
Mohammad Reza Ghadir ◽  
Ali Hasanpour Dehkordi ◽  
Farshad Yadollahi ◽  
Shahriar Salehitali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Bile Ducts ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Allocation Rule ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Duct Cleaning

BACKGROUND Although stenting for the treatment of large and multiple common bile duct stones has been acceptable to everyone, its efficacy and outcome have not been studied in comparison with other endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the consequences of stenting and endoscopic papilla balloon dilatation for the treatment of large and multiple common bile duct stones. METHODS In a double-blind clinical trial, of 431 patients with bile duct stones referred to the treatment center, 64 patients with multiple common bile duct stones ( ≥ 3) and more than 15 cm were selected for the study, then by random allocation rule the participants were allocated in two groups. They were entered into two different endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) and common bile ducts stenting treatments so that both procedures were performed by a person. Both groups were assessed from the point of views therapeutic outcomes such as duct cleaning, pancreatitis, isolated pain, and duct rupture. Data were collected by a self-made questionnaire that was used before and after the procedure to obtain the needed information. Then data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22 and descriptive and analytical tests were used as appropriated. RESULTS Although the duct cleaning and the complete removal of the stones in the stenting treatment procedure was 93.8%, and in EPBD was 78.3%, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (p = 0.14). Pancreatitis significantly increased after the first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the stent group compared with EPBD (p = 0.02). Also, the most frequent cases of isolated pain were in the endoscopic group EPBD (p = 0.0). However, the occurrence of perforation after first ERCP and EPBD was zero, but in the second stage of ERCP, 3.3% of the patients had perforations (p = 0.99). The results indicated that the shape of the stone (circular and angled) was not effective in the result of treatment in the two groups. CONCLUSION The results of this study indicated that in case of experience and skill in conducting the ERCP, common bile duct stenting is still the first line of treatment for large and multiple stones of the common bile ducts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document