scholarly journals The Proliferation of Courts and Tribunals: Navigating Multiple Proceedings – 5th EFILA Annual Lecture 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 447-468
Author(s):  
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Annual Lecture ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Legal Foundations

Recognising that the settlement of international disputes has always been and continues to be characterised by its plurality, this lecture explores the different ways to achieve a coordinated dispute resolution process, with particular reference to investment disputes. Some of these means come into play at the time of the referral to the courts, thus preventing a situation of multiple proceedings from occurring. Others operate downstream of the referral, in order to coordinate the multiple proceedings arising from the same dispute. The lecture then concludes with an examination of the legal foundations underlying the use of these means.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Majelis Tahkim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Rumah Tangga (Analisis Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 tentang Penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Muslem Muslem ◽  
Siti Aminah Binti Abd Samat
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Assembly Process ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Islamic Family Law ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Husband And Wife

Majelis Tahkim sebagai proses penyelesaian sengketa (syiqāq) yang melibatkan pertemuan suami dan isteri bersama dengan Hakam untuk tujuan perdamaian atau perceraian dengan lafaz talak atau dengan khuluk. Berdasarkan fakta empiris menyatakan bahwa salah satu provinsi yang paling menonjol menggunakan metode Majelis Tahkim ini adalah Provinsi Selangor. Sebagaimana yang diketahui oleh penulis bahwa praktek Majelis Tahkim di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang diterapkan khusus di Provinsi Selangor sahaja yang berbeda dengan provinsi yang lain di Malaysia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran bagaimana praktek Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 mengenai penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam (Negeri Selangor) terhadap pelaksanaan Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga (syiqāq) di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam. Penulisan skripsi ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga dan keunggulan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang digunakan. Oleh itu, penulisan ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis. Dari hasil penelitian penulis dapat disimpulkan bahwa mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam terdapat beberapa keunggulan antaranya menjelaskan tentang Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim secara rinci sebagai panduan Hakam. Seterusnya, proses Majelis Tahkim ini mampu mengurangi beban Mahkamah Syariah dalam menyelesaikan kasus yang banyak di meja Mahkamah. Oleh hal yang demikian, diharapkan bagi pihak kerajaan perundangan untuk memberlakukan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam ini bagi semua provinsi di Malaysia agar Hakam mendapatkan panduan lebih mendalam terkait Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim. Tahkim Assembly as a dispute resolution process (SYIQĀQ) involving a husband and wife meeting along with Hakam for peace or divorce with the pronunciation of Talak or with Khuluk. According to empirical facts, it states that one of the most prominent provinces using the method of the Tahkim assembly is Selangor province. As it is known by the authors that the practice of the Tahkim assembly in Shah Alam Sharia court used the essential methods applied in the province of Selangor only different from other provinces in Malaysia. This study aims to obtain an overview of the enactment of Islamic Family Law number 2 the year 2003 section 48 on the addition of the Hakam methods (Selangor State) on the implementation of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes (SYIQĀQ) in the Syariah low court of Shah Alam. The writing of this thesis is aimed at knowing how the Tahkim assembly mechanisms in the settlement of household disputes and the excellence of the Hakam methods used. Thus, this writer uses a descriptive method of analysis. From the results of the author's research can be concluded that the mechanism of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes in Shah Alam Syariah low court using the essential methods there are several advantages between explaining Hakam and the process of Tahkim assembly in detail as a guide to Hakam. Subsequently, the Tahkim assembly process was able to reduce the burden of sharia Court in resolving many cases at the Court table. Therefore, it is expected for the legal government to enforce this Hakam method for all provinces in Malaysia for Hakam to obtain a more in-depth guide to the Hakam and the process of the Tahkim assembly.

scholarly journals Sen, justice and the private realm of dispute resolution

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-373
Author(s):  
Debbie De Girolamo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Private Realm ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Popular Justice ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
Ethnographic Data

AbstractThe attainment of justice through a private dispute-resolution process, such as the mediation process, is an elusive objective. With the prominent place mediation has been given in civil justice, debates about the ability of mediation to deliver substantive justice are relevant, particularly when proponents of the process argue that mediation offers some form of justice to its participants, while critics argue that it provides no justice. This paper explores the issue of justice in the private dispute-resolution process of mediation and its ability to deliver a substantive form of justice (rather than procedural or popular justice, which is often seen as the type of justice, if any, that is provided by mediation). It does so through an analysis of ethnographic data of the mediation process using Amartya Sen's justice framework set out inThe Idea of Justice.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM SISTEM PEER TO PEER LENDING

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Luh Sarini ◽  
Putu Devi Yustisia Utami
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Peer To Peer ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Peer Lending ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan untuk memahami hubungan setiap pihak pada sistem Peer to Peer Lending secara hukum serta menganalisis pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa pada sistem Peer to Peer Lending. Metode pada penelitian ini yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif dengan mempergunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dalam menganalisis isu hukum yang sumber hukumnya berasal dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, serta tersier. Hasil pada penulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa belum  terdapat pengaturan secara khusus terkait penyelesaian sengketa dalam sistem Peer to Peer Lending. Sengketa pada sistem tersebut membutuhkan proses penyelesaian sengketa yang cepat, mudah, serta  terjangkau sehingga perlu dibentuk  Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa online yang khususnya  menangani sengketa bisnis dengan sistem Peer to Peer Lending. This study aims to understand the relationship of each party in the Peer to Peer Lending system legally and to analyze dispute resolution arrangements in the Peer to Peer Lending system. The method in this research is normative juridical research using a statutory approach in analyzing legal issues whose sources of law come from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this paper indicate that there is no specific arrangement regarding dispute resolution in the Peer to Peer Lending system. Disputes in this system require a dispute resolution process that is fast, easy, and affordable, so it is necessary to establish an alternative online Dispute Resolution Institute which specifically handles business disputes with the Peer to Peer Lending system.

scholarly journals Through the Economic Cost of Discrimination: The Way forward for Women in the Somali Customary Justice System

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Abdullahi Ali
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Locus Standi ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
The Right

The Constitution of Kenya guarantees the promotion of customary justice systems. However, in many cases, the dictates of customary law are often in contravention with the progressive attitude embodied in the Constitution. The Constitution guarantees the right to equal treatment of men and women in social, political and cultural spheres. However, women in the Somali customary justice system do not enjoy this right. Women in the Somali customary justice system have no locus standi before any dispute resolution process and they cannot oversee the resolution of disputes as this position is reserved for the elders, who can only be men. Through Gary Becker’s theory on the economics of discrimination, this paper establishes, through an economic lens, that there is a prevailing cost to the Somali community for failing to include women in the processes of the customary justice system. It suggests a way forward of promoting inclusivity in line with the characteristics of customary law.

scholarly journals PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING CONSUMER DISPUTES THROUGH CONSUMER DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AGENCY (BPSK)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Maryanto Maryanto ◽  
Lathifah Hanim ◽  
Dini Amalia Fitri
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Protection System ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Protection Agency ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process

The establishment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (here and after, we will use the acronym BPSK) is to protect consumers and entrepreneurs by designing a Consumer Protection system that contains legal certainty and transparency. The purpose of this study was to determine the procedure for resolving consumer disputes through BPSK. This research uses doctrinal and non-doctrinal approaches. The result of the research is that the procedure for resolving consumer disputes carried out by BPSK is through 2 (two) processes or paths that must be passed if consumers want to resolve consumer disputes with business actors, namely: Dispute Resolution outside the court, namely the process of making a complaint or claim for losses carried out by business actors to BPSK or Non-Governmental Consumer Protection Agency (LPKSM). From these complaints, BPSK is obliged to issue a decision no later than 21 (twenty-one) working days after the claim is received and Dispute Settlement Through the court, namely the process Consumers who feel aggrieved report to the authorities, namely to the police for follow-up as in the dispute resolution process in court. There are 3 (three) ways to settle consumer disputes, namely conciliation, arbitration, and mediation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document