Financial Integration, Investment, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Two Eras of Financial Globalization

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 756-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz Schularick ◽  
Thomas M Steger
2019 ◽  
pp. 873
Author(s):  
Tayseer Ali Al-Momani ◽  
Mohammed Abdel-Karim Al-Momani

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (No. 12) ◽  
pp. 548-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brzozowska Anna ◽  
Bubel Dagmara ◽  
Kalinichenko Antonina ◽  
 Nekrasenko Larysa

The paper is an attempt to address the advantages and risks connected with the wave of financial globalisation, with a focus on its impact on financial policy in European agriculture. The aim of the paper is to identify the basic conditions of the functioning and change of the financial system of agriculture under the conditions of the globalisation of financial markets. Financial globalisation, also referred to as financial integration or openness, is understood as an increase in global ties and interdependences caused by capital flows. Potentially, globalisation can bring a lot of benefits, which are manifested in an acceleration of economic growth and decreased fluctuation in consumption, which should further improve the level of overall prosperity. On the other hand, however, internationalisation of financial flows entails a range of threats, including the possibility of crisis.


10.3386/w9164 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hali Edison ◽  
Ross Levine ◽  
Luca Ricci ◽  
Torsten Slok

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1850081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip K. Das

One of the many definitions of financial globalization is integration of domestic financial system of a country with the global financial markets and institutions. Enabling framework of financial globalization essentially includes liberalization and deregulation of the domestic financial sector as well as liberalization of the capital account. As economies progressively integrate globally, pari passu the financial structures of markets and the world of finance change. Financial globalization cannot be considered a novel phenomenon. Trans-country capital movements are centuries old. The oil shock of 1973 and the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, both of these developments were momentous and were responsible for laying the foundation of the contemporary era of financial globalization. After the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, some middle-income developing economies began to liberalize and open up for greater capital mobility, while keeping an autonomous control over their monetary policy. Advances in IT and computer technology are cited as one of the most important factors driving and supporting financial globalization. Transnational corporations (TNCs) also helped in global financial integration. They expanded their networks by merging with or acquiring other national and international firms. The prime movers in financial globalization are governments, borrowers, investors, and financial institutions. Each one of these market participants propelled economies towards financial integration in a proactive manner. Financial globalization has caused dramatic changes in the structure of national and international capital markets. The most significant change in the capital markets was in the banking system, which went through a process of dis-intermediation. This was a market transformation of fundamental nature. Contagions and crises are the downsides of financial globalization. Economic and financial crises of the 1990s portend to the fact that financial globalization is not a win-win game, and that it can potentially lead to serious disorder and high cost in terms of bank failures, corporate bankruptcies, stock market turbulence, depletion of foreign exchange reserves, currency depreciation and increased fiscal burden. A unique characteristic of globalized financial markets is reversal of capital flows when market perception regarding the creditworthiness of the borrowing entity changes. Cross-country financial flows to the emerging market economies were low, at during the mid-1970s. They increased at a healthy clip during the decades of 1980s and 1990s, peaking in 1997. They suffered a sharp decline after that because of the Asian and Russian financial and economic crises. The composition of external capital underwent a dramatic transformation during this period. Official flows either stagnated or declined. As a result their relative significance in global capital flows dwindled. In their place, private capital flows became the major source of external finance for a good number of emerging market economies. FDI became an important and dependable source of finance for the emerging markets and other middle-income economies during the decade of the 1980s and 1990s. Portfolio investment in stocks and bond markets also increased substantially. Global institutional investors found this channel of investment functional and profitable. Mutual funds, insurance companies, and pension funds channeled large amounts through portfolio investment into the emerging market economies. As financial globalization progressed, presence of international financial intermediaries has expanded considerably. This applies more to international commercial banks than to investment banks, insurance companies and mutual funds. It is incorrect to say that their global expansion has been uniform because this has occurred unevenly. International bond issuance activity by emerging market economies recorded a sharp spurt in 1993. Emerging market economies began using ADRs and GDRs for raising capital from the global capital markets in 1990 in a small way.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Onesmus Mutunga Nzioka

This study set out to investigate the relationship between financialintegration and economic growth in the EAC community states. Secondarydata on financial integration and GDP was obtained from worldbank and theEast African Community(EAC) community secretariat. The data wassubjected to simple linear regression and correlation analysis to achieve theset objective. The study found that, Gross capital flow to GDP (financialopenness) is positively correlated to economic growth (r=0.2093, p <0.05).The study also found that, 3.98% of the variations in economic growth, asmeasured by GDP per capita, within the countries are explained by financialintegration, as measured by the ratio of gross capital flows, 38.98% of thevariations in economic growth between the countries are explained byfinancial integration while 4.38% of the variations in economic growth of theEast African communityEAC as an economic bloc (considering panel data)are explained by financial integration. The findings confirm that, whencapital flows increase, economic growth also increases, pointing to thenecessity of the East African member states to explore ways of increasing thecapital flows between the countries. The researcher recommends conductingof a comparative study between the old and the new EAC to establishwhether the inclusion of Rwanda and Burundi, has had any positive impact(catalyzed) on the level of financial integration and economic growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document