scholarly journals National survey on current situation of critical value reporting in 973 laboratories in China

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Fei ◽  
Haijian Zhao ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Falin He ◽  
Kun Zhong ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Owens ◽  
Ulysses G.J. Balis ◽  
David R. Lucas ◽  
Jeffrey L. Myers

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaeko Yokota ◽  
Hiroki Kuraishi ◽  
Taeko Wachi ◽  
Yusuke Otsuka ◽  
Kazuki Hirama ◽  
...  

The main aim of this study was to determine the current situation of offender profiling in Japan. In addition, the accuracy of crime linkage and inferring offenders’ profiles were examined. To evaluate offender profiling comprehensively, we conducted a national survey of 156 people responsible for offender profiling between 2011 and 2012 to obtain their demographic characteristics and experience related to profiling. Furthermore, we also used a sample of 296 resolved cases to examine the content of profiling and the accuracy of predictions in offender profiling. The results of the statistical analyses revealed that police professionals from various backgrounds were engaged in profiling in Japan; 76% were police investigators, and 19% were professionals at forensic science laboratories engaged in psychological work. Regarding the utilization of profiling results in police investigations, 46% of profiling ‘led to identification of offender’. As for prediction accuracy, the rate of linkage errors (i.e. where profilers could not correctly link incidents even when they knew of the occurrence of these incidents) was 15%. Accurately inferring an offender’s profile was found to be between 72% (means of transportation) and 100% (sex). We also discussed the challenges faced by the police who practise offender profiling in Japan.


2013 ◽  
Vol 712-715 ◽  
pp. 3203-3206
Author(s):  
Hong Wang ◽  
Ying Chang ◽  
Wen Sheng Che

Objective: Through the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act, also called quality loop) cycle in the management of Critical Value Reporting, and then the discussion on the values of their application in the medical field. Methods: Data were divided into two groups (January to March in 2012 as before the implementation of PDCA-cycle and August to October as after the implementation of PDCA-cycle). Statistical analysis was applied for these two groups. Results: After the application of PDCA-cycle, the executing rate of critical values reporting increased from 38.2% to 96.4 % (P=0.000). The percentage of reporting time, repeat critical values reporting, reporters name and staff number, receivers name and staff number rised from 96.4%, 83.6%, 83.6%, 69.1% to 100.0%, 98.8%, 98.8%, 99.8%, respectively (P=0.000). Meanwhile, critical values reporting rate of Laboratory and Radiology also increased from 47.9%, 30.6% to 96.5%, 96.3% (P=0.000). Conclusion: This study suggested that the PDCA-cycle is an important tool for quality management, and it can effectively improve the executions of critical values reporting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha Mosallam ◽  
Samaa Zenhom Ibrahim

2007 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Wagar ◽  
Ana K. Stankovic ◽  
David S. Wilkinson ◽  
Molly Walsh ◽  
Rhona J. Souers

Abstract Context.—Critical laboratory value reporting is a highly visible and essential key activity for clinical laboratories. Objective.—To measure critical laboratory value reporting in multiple institutions over time and to examine the practice patterns and demographic factors associated with sustained improvement in critical value reporting. Design.—A longitudinal cohort study of 180 clinical laboratories that provided quarterly critical values reporting data for 2 to 16 quarters was conducted using a uniform definition of successful caregiver notification. Mixed linear model analysis of the 2001 through 2004 dataset was performed. Results.—A decrease in total and inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results was associated with (1) the American Association of Blood Banks inspection within the past 2 years (P = .01, for both total and inpatient rates); (2) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical value notification (P = .004 [total] and .001 [inpatient]); and (3) the mandatory practice of requiring notification of health care providers when handling inpatients known to have results repeatedly in the critical range (P = .01, for both total and inpatient rates). Continued participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program was associated with significant and progressive improvement in total, inpatient, and outpatient critical value reporting (P = .02, .01, and .003, respectively). Conclusions.—Critical value reporting improved as the duration of participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program increased. Improved total and inpatient critical value reporting was associated with factors that may be markers for institutions with priorities of quality management and enhanced communication with responsible caregivers.


2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (10) ◽  
pp. 1666-1671
Author(s):  
Anand S. Dighe ◽  
Jay B. Jones ◽  
Sue Parham ◽  
Kent B. Lewandrowski

Abstract Context.—Reporting of laboratory critical values has become an issue of national attention because of important regulatory, medicolegal, and clinical concerns. Objective.—To survey aspects of the laboratory critical-value reporting process at a broad range of institutions. Design.—A survey was developed regarding the operational and information-technology aspects of critical value reporting. Results.—More than 730 responses were obtained from a broad distribution of hospitals. In addition, we analyzed more than 700 written responses from survey participants. Conclusions.—The survey results provide insight into the standard of practice and level of compliance with current Joint Commission and College of American Pathologists requirements for critical values, demonstrate considerable heterogeneity, and suggest areas for improvement. A common issue raised during the survey and follow-up teleconference was the incidence of outpatient false-positive critical values. In this report, we also demonstrate that attention to preanalytic transport and processing issues can assist in minimizing this issue.


2006 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 758-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand S. Dighe ◽  
Arjun Rao ◽  
Amanda B. Coakley ◽  
Kent B. Lewandrowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document