Phase 1/2a Trial of ISPASM

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Zanaty ◽  
Lauren Allan ◽  
Edgar A. Samaniego ◽  
Anthony Piscopo ◽  
Eleanor Ryan ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Microthrombosis could play a role in delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tirofiban has shown promising results in reducing delayed cerebral ischemia in retrospective studies. However, the safety of using tirofiban in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is not rigorously established. Methods: A phase 1/2a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (2:1 randomization) to assess the safety of a 7-day intravenous infusion of tirofiban compared with placebo, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with ventriculostomy placed in the operative room and coiling was conducted. The primary end point was any intracranial hemorrhage during the hospital stay. The secondary end points were: incidence of radiographic and clinical vasospasm, incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia, and incidence of cerebral ischemic changes noted on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Results: Eighteen patients received intravenous tirofiban and 12 received placebo. There was no difference in baseline characteristics except for higher male proportions in the tirofiban group. There was no difference in death, in development of new or change in existing intracranial hemorrhages, in thrombocytopenia, and need for shunts in the two arms. However, the tirofiban arm had a lower incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia compared with placebo (6% [1/18] versus 33% [4/12]; P =0.04), and less radiographic vasospasm as detected by catheter angiogram or computed tomography angiography ( P =0.01) and computed tomography perfusion ( P =0.01). Conclusions: The above preliminary results support proceeding with further testing of the safety and efficacy of 7-day intravenous infusion of tirofiban in a pragmatic (placing external ventricular drain by the bedside), multicenter setting, and using a larger population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03691727.

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2287-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Anetsberger ◽  
Jens Gempt ◽  
Manfred Blobner ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
Ralf Bogdanski ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is the most important cause for a poor clinical outcome after a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess whether goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT), as compared to standard clinical care, reduces the rate of DCI after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients >18 years of age with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were enrolled and randomly assigned to standard therapy or GDHT. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring and predefined GDHT algorithms were applied in the GDHT group. The primary end point was the occurrence of DCI. Functional outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 3 months after discharge. Results: In total, 108 patients were randomized to the control (n=54) or GDHT group (n=54). The primary outcome (DCI) occurred in 13% of the GDHT group and in 32% of the control group patients (odds ratio, 0.324 [95% CI, 0.11–0.86]; P =0.021). Even after adjustment for confounding parameters, GDHT was found to be superior to standard therapy (hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% CI, 1.18–6.86]; P =0.02). The GOS was assessed 3 months after discharge in 107 patients; it showed more patients with a low disability (GOS 5, minor or no deficits) than patients with higher deficits (GOS 1–4) in the GDHT group compared with the control group (GOS 5, 66% versus 44%; GOS 1–4, 34% versus 56%; P =0.025). There was no significant difference in mortality between the groups. Conclusions: GDHT reduced the rate of DCI after subarachnoid hemorrhage with a better functional outcome (GOS=5) 3 months after discharge. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01832389.


Stroke ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1927-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Willem Dankbaar ◽  
Nicolien Karen de Rooij ◽  
Mienke Rijsdijk ◽  
Birgitta K. Velthuis ◽  
Catharine J.M. Frijns ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon K. Burns ◽  
Kacie J. Brewer ◽  
Courtney Jenkins ◽  
Sally Miller

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is potentially fatal and is associated with poor outcomes in many patients. Advances in neurosurgical and medical management of ruptured aneurysms have improved mortality rates in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surgical and endovascular interventions, such as external ventricular drain placement, aneurysm clipping, and endovascular coiling, have been developed over the past few decades. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage are also at risk for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. This article describes the diagnosis and treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, vasospasm, and cerebral ischemia. Concurrent medical considerations and ideas for future neuroinflammatory vasospasm research are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359
Author(s):  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
Brandon Christophe ◽  
Samuel Bruce ◽  
Amanda M. Carpenter ◽  
Trae Robison ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a significant contributor to poor outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The neurotoxin 3-aminopropanal (3-AP) is upregulated in cerebral ischemia. This phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of tiopronin in reducing CSF 3-AP levels in patients with aSAH.METHODSIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, 60 patients were assigned to receive tiopronin or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Treatment was commenced within 96 hours after aSAH onset, administered at a dose of 3 g daily, and continued until 14 days after aSAH or hospital discharge, whichever occurred earlier. The primary efficacy outcome was the CSF 3-AP level at 7 ± 1 days after aSAH.RESULTSOf the 60 enrolled patients, 29 (97%) and 27 (93%) in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively, received more than one dose of the study drug or placebo. At post-aSAH day 7 ± 1, CSF samples were available in 41% (n = 12/29) and 48% (n = 13/27) of patients in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively. No difference in CSF 3-AP levels at post-aSAH day 7 ± 1 was observed between the study arms (11 ± 12 nmol/mL vs 13 ± 18 nmol/mL; p = 0.766). Prespecified adverse events led to early treatment cessation for 4 patients in the tiopronin arm and 2 in the placebo arm.CONCLUSIONSThe power of this study was affected by missing data. Therefore, the authors could not establish or refute an effect of tiopronin on CSF 3-AP levels. Additional observational studies investigating the role of 3-AP as a biomarker for DCI may be warranted prior to its use as a molecular target in future clinical trials.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01095731 (ClinicalTrials.gov)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document