scholarly journals Antiplatelet Therapy After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Functional Outcomes

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3057-3063
Author(s):  
Santosh B. Murthy ◽  
Alessandro Biffi ◽  
Guido J. Falcone ◽  
Lauren H. Sansing ◽  
Victor Torres Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background and Purpose— Observational data suggest that antiplatelet therapy after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) alleviates thromboembolic risk without increasing the risk of recurrent ICH. Given the paucity of data on the relationship between antiplatelet therapy after ICH and functional outcomes, we aimed to study this association in a multicenter cohort. Methods— We meta-analyzed data from (1) the Massachusetts General Hospital ICH registry (n=1854), (2) the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive database (n=762), and (3) the Yale stroke registry (n=185). Our exposure was antiplatelet therapy after ICH, which was modeled as a time-varying covariate. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and a composite of major disability or death (modified Rankin Scale score 4–6). We used Cox proportional regression analyses to estimate the hazard ratio of death or poor functional outcome as a function of antiplatelet therapy and random-effects meta-analysis to pool the estimated HRs across studies. Additional analyses stratified by hematoma location (lobar and deep ICH) were performed. Results— We included a total of 2801 ICH patients, of whom 288 (10.3%) were started on antiplatelet medications after ICH. Median times to antiplatelet therapy ranged from 7 to 39 days. Antiplatelet therapy after ICH was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66–1.09), or death or major disability (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59–1.16) compared with patients not started on antiplatelet therapy. Similar results were obtained in additional analyses stratified by hematoma location. Conclusions— Antiplatelet therapy after ICH appeared safe and was not associated with all-cause mortality or functional outcome, regardless of hematoma location. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the effects and harms of antiplatelet therapy after ICH.

scholarly journals Effects of Prior Antiplatelet Therapy on Mortality, Functional Outcome, and Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujie Wu ◽  
Donghang Zhang ◽  
Hongyang Chen ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Cheng Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hematoma Expansion ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Meta Regression Analysis ◽  
Trim And Fill

Background and Objective: Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is widely used and believed to be associated with increased poor prognosis by promoting bleeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether prior APT is associated with mortality, functional outcome, and hematoma expansion in ICH patients.Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant published studies up to December 11, 2020. Univariate and multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random effects model. Cochran's chi-squared test (Cochran's Q), the I2 statistic, and meta-regression analysis were used to evaluate the heterogeneity. Meta-regression models were developed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. A trim-and-fill method was performed to identify possible asymmetry and assess the robustness of the conclusions.Results: Thirty-one studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and exhibited a moderate risk of bias. Prior APT users with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) had a slightly increased mortality in both univariate analyses [odds ratio (OR) 1.39, 95% CI 1.24–1.56] and multivariable adjusted analyses (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21–1.64). The meta-regression indicated that for each additional day of assessment time, the adjusted OR for the mortality of APT patients decreased by 0.0089 (95% CI: −0.0164 to −0.0015; P = 0.0192) compared to that of non-APT patients. However, prior APT had no effects on poor function outcome (pooled univariate OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.59–1.66; pooled multivariable adjusted OR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–1.07) or hematoma growth (pooled univariate OR: 1.23, 95% CI 0.40–3.74, pooled multivariable adjusted OR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.24–3.60).Conclusions: Prior APT was not associated with hematoma expansion or functional outcomes, but there was modestly increased mortality in prior APT patients. Higher mortality of prior APT patients was related to the strong influence of prior APT use on early mortality.Systematic Review Registration:PROSPERO Identifier [CRD42020215243].

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Plasma D-Dimer Levels for Predicting Stroke Outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Chun Wang ◽  
Junhua Wu ◽  
Shiliang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Stroke Outcome ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
The Impact ◽  
D Dimer

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Over the past decade, plasma D-dimer levels have emerged as a biomarker for predicting stroke outcome. However, no consensus in the literature currently exists concerning its utility for predicting post-stroke functional outcome and mortality.Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness of plasma D-dimer levels for predicting functional outcome and mortality following stroke.Methods: Five academic databases were screened according to PRISMA guidelines for eligible studies. With these studies, we conducted a random-effect meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of plasma D-dimer levels for predicting functional outcome and mortality post-stroke. We also conducted subgroup analyses to evaluate differences in predictive capacity for different stroke subtypes.Results: Nineteen studies were included, containing data on 5,781 stroke patients (mean age: 65.26 ± 6.4 years). Overall methodological quality for the included studies was high. Meta-analysis showed that increased D-dimer levels were predictive of worsened functional outcomes (Hazard ratio: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.63–2.93) and elevated overall mortality (2.29, 1.35–3.88). Subgroup analysis showed that plasma D-dimer levels were more predictive of poorer functional outcomes for ischemic (2.08, 1.36–3.18) stroke as compared to intracerebral hemorrhage (2.62, 1.65–4.17). We also noted that predictive capacity was similar when it came to mortality in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke (2.65, 0.87–8.08) and intracerebral hemorrhage (2.63, 1.50–4.59).Conclusion: The study provides preliminary evidence concerning the capacity of plasma D-dimer levels for predicting functional outcomes and mortality following stroke and reports that higher D-dimer levels of are associated with poorer functional outcomes and higher mortality.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure in Sinus Rhythm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e383-e392
Author(s):  
Marie H. Nygaard ◽  
Anne-Mette Hvas ◽  
Erik L. Grove
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction There is conflicting evidence on the risk–benefit ratio of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in heart failure (HF) patients without atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OAC in HF patients in sinus rhythm. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies, comparing OAC with antiplatelet or no treatment/placebo in patients with HF. Outcomes evaluated were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. Results Five RCTs and three cohort studies were included. OAC was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke when compared with no treatment/placebo (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.47, 0.94]) and antiplatelet therapy (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: [0.37, 0.81]). No significant reduction was found in MI, when OAC was compared with no treatment/placebo (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: [0.63, 1.07]) or antiplatelet therapy (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: [0.60, 1.81]). The all-cause mortality analysis showed no significant reduction when comparing OAC with no treatment/placebo (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.12]) or antiplatelet therapy (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: [0.86, 1.16]). The nonsignificant effect of OAC on all-cause mortality was supported by a meta-analysis of the three cohort studies (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: [0.75, 1.38]). Patients treated with OAC had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding than patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: [1.55, 3.00]) and a numerically higher risk when compared with no treatment/placebo (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: [0.87, 6.49]). Conclusion The present study does not support the routine use of OAC in patients with HF in sinus rhythm.

Dexamethasone in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-502
Author(s):  
Stephanie Wintzer ◽  
Josef Georg Heckmann ◽  
Hagen B. Huttner ◽  
Stefan Schwab
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Language Data ◽  
Negative Effect

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a frequent cerebrovascular disorder and still associated with high mortality and poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this review was to update a 15-year-old former meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) addressing the question of whether ICH patients treated with dexamethasone have better outcomes than controls. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane as well as web platforms on current clinical trials were searched for the years 1970–2020 without constriction on language. Data were extracted and outcomes were pooled for conventional and cumulative meta-analysis using a commercial software program (www.Meta-Analysis.com). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Finally, 7 RCTs were identified and analyzed including 248 participants in the dexamethasone groups and 242 in the control groups. Five studies showed a high risk of bias. The overall relative risk (RR) for death was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.76; <i>p</i> = 0.06) and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias, the RR for death was 1.37 (95% CI 0.54–3.42; <i>p</i> = 0.51). The RR for poor outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups analyzed for all included studies (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1; <i>p</i> = 0.05) and after exclusion of studies with high risk of bias (RR = 0.7; 95% CI 0.45–1.08; <i>p</i> = 0.11). The RR for complications did not differ significantly including all studies (RR = 1.29; 95% CI 0.77–2.17; <i>p</i> = 0.34) and after exclusion of studies with high risk of bias (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 0.18–8.89; <i>p</i> = 0.81). The cumulative statistics delivered no other results; however, it pointed out fewer complications over time in the dexamethasone group. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Clear evidence of a beneficial or negative effect of dexamethasone is still lacking. Modern RCTs or observational studies with propensity design are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with dexamethasone in patients with ICH.

scholarly journals Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Kuno ◽  
Yujiro Yokoyama ◽  
Alexandros Briasoulis ◽  
Makoto Mori ◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Life Threatening

Background Although current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 to 6 months following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there are no studies directly comparing outcomes of different durations of DAPT following TAVR. Methods and Results PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database were searched through November 2020 to identify clinical studies that investigated single antiplatelet therapy versus DAPT use following TAVR. Studies using oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy concomitantly were excluded. The DAPT group was subdivided by the duration of DAPT. We extracted the risk ratios (RRs) of major or life‐threatening bleeding, stroke, and all‐cause mortality. Four randomized controlled trials, 2 propensity‐score matched studies, and 1 observational study were identified, yielding a total of 2498 patients who underwent TAVR assigned to the single antiplatelet therapy group (n=1249), 3‐month DAPT group (n=485), or 6‐month DAPT group (n=764). Pooled analyses demonstrated that when compared with the single antiplatelet therapy group, the rates of major or life‐threatening bleeding were significantly higher in the 3‐ and 6‐month DAPT groups (RR [95% CI]=2.13 [1.33–3.40], P =0.016; RR [95% CI]=2.54 [1.49–4.33], P =0.007, respectively) with no difference between the 3‐month DAPT versus 6‐month DAPT groups. The rates of stroke and all‐cause mortality were similar among the 3 groups. Conclusions In this network meta‐analysis of antiplatelet therapy following TAVR, single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin had lower bleeding without increasing stroke or death when compared with either 3‐ or 6‐month DAPT.

scholarly journals Outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with different oral anticoagulants

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (18) ◽  
pp. 1693-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan Wilson ◽  
David J. Seiffge ◽  
Christopher Traenka ◽  
Ghazala Basir ◽  
Jan C. Purrucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Hematoma Expansion ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
International Collaborative

Objective:In an international collaborative multicenter pooled analysis, we compared mortality, functional outcome, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume, and hematoma expansion (HE) between non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation–related ICH (NOAC-ICH) and vitamin K antagonist–associated ICH (VKA-ICH).Methods:We compared all-cause mortality within 90 days for NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age; sex; baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, ICH location, and log volume; intraventricular hemorrhage volume; and intracranial surgery. We addressed heterogeneity using a shared frailty term. Good functional outcome was defined as discharge modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and investigated in multivariable logistic regression. ICH volume was measured by ABC/2 or a semiautomated planimetric method. HE was defined as an ICH volume increase >33% or >6 mL from baseline within 72 hours.Results:We included 500 patients (97 NOAC-ICH and 403 VKA-ICH). Median baseline ICH volume was 14.4 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6–38.4) for NOAC-ICH vs 10.6 mL (IQR 4.0–27.9) for VKA-ICH (p = 0.78). We did not find any difference between NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH for all-cause mortality within 90 days (33% for NOAC-ICH vs 31% for VKA-ICH [p = 0.64]; adjusted Cox hazard ratio (for NOAC-ICH vs VKA-ICH) 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–1.64] [p = 0.79]), the rate of HE (NOAC-ICH n = 29/48 [40%] vs VKA-ICH n = 93/140 [34%] [p = 0.45]), or functional outcome at hospital discharge (NOAC-ICH vs VKA-ICH odds ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.18–1.19 [p = 0.11]).Conclusions:In our international collaborative multicenter pooled analysis, baseline ICH volume, hematoma expansion, 90-day mortality, and functional outcome were similar following NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH.

Association between Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Clinical Outcome after Ischemic Stroke, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Wen Pan ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Zhenping Guo ◽  
Wenfeng Xiao ◽  
Chao You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Apolipoprotein E ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fixed Effects Models ◽  
Increased Risk

<b><i>Backgrounds:</i></b> Previous studies reported inconsistent results regarding associations between apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) polymorphism and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Thus, the study was designed to make a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the association between <i>APOE</i> polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To identify studies eligible for this meta-analysis, we searched for articles published before August 2021 in the databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). We used STATA 12.0 software to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding <i>APOE</i> polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Meta-analysis showed no significant association between <i>APOE</i> polymorphism and functional outcome after IS with fixed effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.83–1.21, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 29.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.183; ε2 carrier vs. non-ε2 carrier: HR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.72–1.16, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 15.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.307). Meta-analysis showed that ICH patients carrying ε4 allele have increased risk of poor outcome in Caucasian population with fixed effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.75; 95% CI: 1.19–2.57, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.543). Meta-analysis showed no significant association between <i>APOE</i> polymorphism and functional outcomes after SAH with random effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.51; 95% CI: 0.80–2.84, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 57.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.022). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In conclusion, the present study demonstrated <i>APOE</i> ε4 carriers show worse functional outcomes after ICH, but not after IS or SAH. More large-scale studies were critical to explore the association between <i>APOE</i> polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document