scholarly journals Magnetic Resonance Vessel Wall Imaging in Human Intracranial Aneurysms

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Hudson ◽  
Mario Zanaty ◽  
Daichi Nakagawa ◽  
David K. Kung ◽  
Pascal Jabbour ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
Kohei Yoshikawa ◽  
Junta Moroi ◽  
Kohei Kokubun ◽  
Nobuharu Furuya ◽  
Yasuyuki Yoshida ◽  
...  

Background: Wall enhancement of intracranial saccular aneurysms in high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (MR-VWI) might indicate a ruptured aneurysm. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the diagnostic ability of wall enhancement to detect the ruptured aneurysms among multiple aneurysms. Methods: Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and multiple intracranial aneurysms who underwent MR-VWI before craniotomy and clipping were included in the study. Three-dimensional T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequences were obtained before and after gadolinium injection. Aneurysm rupture was estimated based on the subarachnoid clot distribution, aneurysmal contours, and MR-VWI findings. We selectively performed surgical clipping and confirmed the rupture site intraoperatively. Results: Thirteen patients with SAH with 13 ruptured and 17 unruptured aneurysms were treated at out facility. The accuracy rate of rupture site diagnosis using MR-VWI was 69.2% (9/13 cases). Each unruptured aneurysm was equally or more strongly enhanced in the other four cases than the ruptured aneurysms. In three of the four unruptured aneurysms with positive MR-VWI findings, atherosclerosis of the aneurysmal wall was observed during simultaneous or elective clipping surgery. Further, clipping surgery was performed without intraoperative rupture in two cases with the help of MR-VWI findings. Conclusion: Correct diagnosis of the rupture site using MR-VWI alone was unreliable due to false positives caused by the wall enhancement of unruptured aneurysms with atherosclerosis. Therefore, ruptured aneurysms should be detected using more information in addition to MR-VWI images. MR-VWI may be advantageous to determine surgical strategies when managing patients with SAH and multiple aneurysms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 1262-1268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Omodaka ◽  
Hidenori Endo ◽  
Kuniyasu Niizuma ◽  
Miki Fujimura ◽  
Takashi Inoue ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVERecent MR vessel wall imaging studies have indicated intracranial aneurysms in the active state could show circumferential enhancement along the aneurysm wall (CEAW). While ruptured aneurysms frequently show CEAW, CEAW in unruptured aneurysms at the evolving state (i.e., growing or symptomatic) has not been studied in detail. The authors quantitatively assessed the degree of CEAW in evolving unruptured aneurysms by comparing it separately to that in stable unruptured and ruptured aneurysms.METHODSA quantitative analysis of CEAW was performed in 26 consecutive evolving aneurysms using MR vessel wall imaging. Three-dimensional T1-weighted fast spin echo sequences were obtained before and after contrast media injection, and the contrast ratio of the aneurysm wall against the pituitary stalk (CRstalk) was calculated as the indicator of CEAW. Aneurysm characteristics of evolving aneurysms were compared with those of 69 stable unruptured and 67 ruptured aneurysms.RESULTSThe CRstalk values in evolving aneurysms were significantly higher than those in stable aneurysms (0.54 vs 0.34, p < 0.0001), and lower than those in ruptured aneurysms (0.54 vs 0.83, p < 0.0002). In multivariable analysis, CRstalk remained significant when comparing evolving with stable aneurysms (odds ratio [OR] 12.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.53–42.41), and with ruptured aneurysms (OR 0.083, 95% CI 0.022–0.310).CONCLUSIONSThe CEAW in evolving aneurysms was higher than those in stable aneurysms, and lower than those in ruptured aneurysms. The degree of CEAW may indicate the process leading to rupture of intracranial aneurysms, which can be useful additional information to determine an indication for surgical treatment of unruptured aneurysms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 588
Author(s):  
PN Sylaja ◽  
K Arun ◽  
Chinmay Nagesh ◽  
C Kesavadas ◽  
SapnaE Sreedharan

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
PN Sylaja ◽  
Rajendran Adhithyan ◽  
Praveen Kesav ◽  
Bejoy Thomas ◽  
Chandrasekharan Kesavadas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document