scholarly journals Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy at Stroke Onset

Stroke ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Diedler ◽  
Niaz Ahmed ◽  
Marek Sykora ◽  
Maarten Uyttenboogaart ◽  
Karsten Overgaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Onset

scholarly journals Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Uyttenboogaart ◽  
Marcus W. Koch ◽  
Karen Koopman ◽  
Patrick C. A. J. Vroomen ◽  
Jacques De Keyser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis

Abstract T P19: “Futile” Interhospital Transfer for Endovascular Recanalization Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke. The Madrid Stroke Network

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca Fuentes ◽  
Maria Alonso de Leciñana ◽  
Alvaro Ximenez-Carrillo ◽  
Patricia Martínez-Sánchez ◽  
Antonio Cruz-Culebras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Interhospital Transfer ◽  
Hospital Transfer ◽  
Arterial Recanalization

Objectives: The complexity of endovascular revascularization treatment (ERT) in acute ischemic stroke (IS) and the small number of patients eligible for that treatment justifies the development of Stroke Center networks with interhospital transfer of eligible patients. But it is possible that this approach generate “futile“ transfers (i.e. shift of patients who finally do not receive ET) generating unnecessary costs. Our aim is to analyze the frequency of “futile” transfers, the reasons for rejection for ERT and to identify the possible associated factors. Methods: We analyzed a prospective registry of ERT from a Stroke Network integrated by three hospitals with facilities for ERT for acute stroke patients. These hospitals share a common stroke protocol and have established a weekly rotatory shift with inter-hospital transference to the on-call center for ERT in those patients in whom this therapy is indicated, both primarily, after completing IV thrombolysis or in patients attended in outside hospitals (drip and shift). We analyzed: demographic data, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, frequency of prior intravenous thrombolysis, time from stroke onset and reasons for rejection. Study period: 1/02/2012 to 07/05/2013. Results: ERT protocol was activated in 199 patients, receiving ERT 129 (64.8%). 120 (60.3%) patients required inter-hospital transfer, among them 50 (41%) were not finally treated (futile transfer). These were more often male (74.1% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.04), with no differences in age, vascular risk factors, time-lapse from stroke onset or delay of inter-hospital transfer, baseline NIHSS, baseline ASPECTS or rate of prior intravenous thrombolysis between transferred patients treated with ERT and those non-treated. Reasons for rejection were: clinical improvement (16%), arterial recanalization (24%), clinical deterioration (8%); ASPECTS <7 in the 2nd TC (20%), absence of mismatch (20%); delay in shipment (2%), revocation of consent (1%). Conclusions: 40% of shipments for ERT are “futile”. None of the baseline patient characteristics predict this fact, being arterial recanalization and findings in a second imaging test done in the receiving hospital the main reasons for ERT rejection.

Abstract TMP22: Safety of Pretreatment With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Ali Kerro ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Rashi Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis

scholarly journals Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion With COVID-19

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2540-2543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Escalard ◽  
Benjamin Maïer ◽  
Hocine Redjem ◽  
François Delvoye ◽  
Solène Hébert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Neurological Improvement ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Background and Purpose: Higher rates of strokes have been observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but data regarding the outcomes of COVID-19 patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) are lacking. We report our initial experience in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with LVO in patients with COVID-19. Methods: All consecutive patients with COVID-19 with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO treated in our institution during the 6 first weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak were included. Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment, and short-term outcomes are reported. Results: We identified 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated for an acute ischemic stroke due to LVO. Eight were men, with a median age of 59.5 years. Seven had none or mild symptoms of COVID-19 at stroke onset. Median time from COVID-19 symptoms to stroke onset was 6 days. All patients had brain imaging within 3 hours from symptoms onset. Five patients had multi-territory LVO. Five received intravenous alteplase. All patients had mechanical thrombectomy. Nine patients achieved successful recanalization (mTICI2B-3), none experienced early neurological improvement, 4 had early cerebral reocclusion, and a total of 6 patients (60%) died in the hospital. Conclusions: Best medical care including early intravenous thrombolysis, and successful and prompt recanalization achieved with mechanical thrombectomy, resulted in poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Although our results require further confirmation, a different pharmacological approach (antiplatelet or other) should be investigated to take in account inflammatory and coagulation disorders associated with COVID-19.

High Plasma D-Dimer Indicates Unfavorable Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Jen Hsu ◽  
Chih-Hao Chen ◽  
Shin-Joe Yeh ◽  
Li-Kai Tsai ◽  
Sung-Chun Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
D Dimer

Background: D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product and a possible marker of thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between D-dimer levels and outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis. Methods: This retrospective study included AIS patients who received intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and provided plasma D-dimer level within 24 h after stroke onset during 2009 and 2014 at a single medical center. Unfavorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale ≥3 at 3 months after stroke. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was defined as a deterioration of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 36 h post thrombolysis. Results: Of 347 patients receiving intravenous rt-PA, 159 (mean age 67.6 ± 13.1 year, 59.7% male) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In univariate analysis, patients with unfavorable outcome (n = 79) had significantly higher levels of D-dimer than those with favorable outcome (median ln D-dimer = 1.4 vs. 0.7 μg/ml, p < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical variables, a higher level of D-dimer remained significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27-2.86, p = 0.002) and the occurrence of symptomatic ICH (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.15-7.70, p = 0.025). Conclusion: The D-dimer level within 24 h after stroke onset can be an early outcome indicator in AIS patients receiving rt-PA therapy.

scholarly journals Influence of Onset to Imaging Time on Radiological Thrombus Characteristics in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon L. Tolhuisen ◽  
Manon Kappelhof ◽  
Bruna G. Dutra ◽  
Ivo G. H. Jansen ◽  
Valeria Guglielmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Blood Stasis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Stroke Etiology ◽  
Imaging Time ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Mr Clean

Introduction: Radiological thrombus characteristics are associated with patient outcomes and treatment success after acute ischemic stroke. These characteristics could be expected to undergo time-dependent changes due to factors influencing thrombus architecture like blood stasis, clot contraction, and natural thrombolysis. We investigated whether stroke onset-to-imaging time was associated with thrombus length, perviousness, and density in the MR CLEAN Registry population.Methods: We included 245 patients with M1-segment occlusions and thin-slice baseline CT imaging from the MR CLEAN Registry, a nation-wide multicenter registry of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke within 6.5 h of onset in the Netherlands. We used multivariable linear regression to investigate the effect of stroke onset-to-imaging time (per 5 min) on thrombus length (in mm), perviousness and density (both in Hounsfield Units). In the first model, we adjusted for age, sex, intravenous thrombolysis, antiplatelet use, and history of atrial fibrillation. In a second model, we additionally adjusted for observed vs. non-observed stroke onset, CT-angiography collateral score, direct presentation at a thrombectomy-capable center vs. transfer, and stroke etiology. We performed exploratory subgroup analyses for intravenous thrombolysis administration, observed vs. non-observed stroke onset, direct presentation vs. transfer, and stroke etiology.Results: Median stroke onset-to-imaging time was 83 (interquartile range 53–141) min. Onset to imaging time was not associated with thrombus length nor perviousness (β 0.002; 95% CI −0.004 to 0.007 and β −0.002; 95% CI −0.015 to 0.011 per 5 min, respectively) and was weakly associated with thrombus density in the fully adjusted model (adjusted β 0.100; 95% CI 0.005–0.196 HU per 5 min). The subgroup analyses showed no heterogeneity of these findings in any of the subgroups, except for a significantly positive relation between onset-to-imaging time and thrombus density in patients transferred from a primary stroke center (adjusted β 0.18; 95% CI 0.022–0.35).Conclusion: In our population of acute ischemic stroke patients, we found no clear association between onset-to-imaging time and radiological thrombus characteristics. This suggests that elapsed time from stroke onset plays a limited role in the interpretation of radiological thrombus characteristics and their effect on treatment results, at least in the early time window.

scholarly journals Acute ischemic stroke with cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion: multicenter analysis of endovascular approaches

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Cirillo ◽  
Daniele Giuseppe Romano ◽  
Gianfranco Vornetti ◽  
Giulia Frauenfelder ◽  
Chiara Tamburrano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Response To Treatment

Abstract Background Occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), whether isolated or in the setting of a tandem lesion (TL) have a poor response to treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Previous studies ​​have demonstrated the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) following large vessel occlusion, compared to standard intravenous fibrinolysis. The aim of our study was to describe endovascular treatment (EVT) in AIS due to isolated ICA occlusion or TL. Methods We assessed the association between 90-day outcome and clinical, demographic, imaging, and procedure data in 51 consecutive patients with acute isolated ICA occlusion or TL who underwent EVT. We evaluated baseline NIHSS and mRS, ASPECTS, type of occlusion, stent placement, use of stent retrievers and/or thromboaspiration, duration of the procedure, mTICI, postprocedural therapy and complications. Results A favorable 90-day outcome (mRS 0–2) was achieved in 34 patients (67 %) and was significantly associated with the use of dual antiplatelet therapy after the procedure (p = 0.008), shorter procedure duration (p = 0.031), TICI 2b-3 (p < 0.001) and lack of post-procedural hemorrhagic transformation (p = 0.001). Four patients did not survive, resulting in a mortality rate of 8 %. Conclusions Our study has shown that EVT in the treatment of AIS due to ICA occlusion is safe, and effective in determining a good functional outcome. ICA stenting led to good angiographic results and therapy with a glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitor immediately after stent release did not result in a greater risk of hemorrhage. The use of post-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with favorable outcome, without a significant increase in hemorrhagic transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document