Abstract TMP8: Intravenous Thrombolysis and Endovascular Treatment in Chronically Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample From 2006 to 2014

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mohammad Rauf Afzal ◽  
Omar Saeed ◽  
Saqib Chaudhary ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

scholarly journals Access to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in the United States

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hooman Kamel ◽  
Neal S. Parikh ◽  
Abhinaba Chatterjee ◽  
Luke K. Kim ◽  
Jeffrey L. Saver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Cerebral Vessel

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy helps prevent disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke involving occlusion of a large cerebral vessel. Thrombectomy requires procedural expertise and not all hospitals have the staff to perform this intervention. Few population-wide data exist regarding access to mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: We examined access to thrombectomy for ischemic stroke using discharge data from calendar years 2016 to 2018 from all nonfederal emergency departments and acute care hospitals across 11 US states encompassing 80 million residents. Facilities were classified as hubs if they performed mechanical thrombectomy, gateways if they transferred patients who ultimately underwent mechanical thrombectomy, and gaps otherwise. We used standard descriptive statistics and unadjusted logistic regression models in our primary analyses. Results: Among 205 681 patients with ischemic stroke, 100 139 (48.7% [95% CI, 48.5%–48.9%]) initially received care at a thrombectomy hub, 72 534 (35.3% [95% CI, 35.1%–35.5%]) at a thrombectomy gateway, and 33 008 (16.0% [95% CI, 15.9%–16.2%]) at a thrombectomy gap. Patients who initially received care at thrombectomy gateways were substantially less likely to ultimately undergo thrombectomy than patients who initially received care at thrombectomy hubs (odds ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.25–0.28]). Rural patients had particularly limited access: 27.7% (95% CI, 26.9%–28.6%) of such patients initially received care at hubs versus 69.5% (95% CI, 69.1%–69.9%) of urban patients. For 93.8% (95% CI, 93.6%–94.0%) of patients with stroke at gateways, their initial facility was capable of delivering intravenous thrombolysis, compared with 76.3% (95% CI, 75.8%–76.7%) of patients at gaps. Our findings were unchanged in models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities and persisted across multiple sensitivity analyses, including analyses adjusting for estimated stroke severity. Conclusions: We found that a substantial proportion of patients with ischemic stroke across the United States lacked access to thrombectomy even after accounting for interhospital transfers. US systems of stroke care require further development to optimize thrombectomy access.

scholarly journals Solitaire Flow Restoration Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Erol Veznedaroglu ◽  
Mandy J. Binning ◽  
Kenneth M. Liebman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Flow Restoration ◽  
Solitaire Fr

Abstract BACKGROUND: The promising results of the Solitaire Flow Restoration (FR) With the Intention for Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial recently led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Solitaire FR stent retriever device for recanalization of cerebral vessels in patients with acute ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVE: To report the early postmarket experience with this device since its FDA approval in the United States, which has not been previously described. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive acute ischemic strokes cases treated between March 2012 and July 2012 at 10 United States centers where the Solitaire FR was used as a single device or in conjunction with other intraarterial endovascular approaches. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were identified (mean age, 64.7 years; mean admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score, 17.6). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39% of cases; other endovascular techniques were utilized in conjunction with the Solitaire FR in 52%. Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 2/3) was achieved in 88%. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within the first 24 hours was 15%. In-hospital mortality was 26%. At 30 days, 38% of patients had favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score ⩽2). Severity of NIHSS score on admission was a strong predictor of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a variety of other endovascular approaches are used in conjunction with Solitaire FR in actual practice in the United States. Early postmarket results suggest that Solitaire FR is an effective tool for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Abstract TMP71: Increasing Prevalence of Secondary Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadar O Otite ◽  
Anita Tipirneni ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal ◽  
Amer M Malik ◽  
Kristine O’phelan
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Temporal Data ◽  
Innovative Strategies ◽  
Hospital Morbidity

Background: Temporal data on secondary intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) risk in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients (pts) is sparse since implementation of current measures to lessen times to intravenous thrombolysis (tPA) and/or endovascular reperfusion. Aims: (1) Evaluate trends in SICH prevalence in AIS pts in the United States from 2004-2013 and to compare SICH risk following tPA and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) from 2011-2013 to risk in earlier periods. (2) Assess the magnitude of the current association of SICH with in-hospital morbidities and mortality in AIS. Methods: All adults with a primary diagnosis of AIS (n=4,355,140) were identified from the 2004-2013 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We computed weighted risk of SICH in AIS according to age, sex and intervention received (tPA, MT or no-intervention). Multivariate models were used to compare SICH risks in the period 2004-2007 to periods 2008-2010 and 2011-2013, respectively, and to evaluate association of SICH with in-hospital morbidity, mortality, length-of-stay (LOS) and cost. Results: SICH risk increased over the study period but most of the increase occurred after 2010 (figure 1). From the period 2004-2007 to period 2011-2013, SICH risk increased by 75% in IV tPA pts (4.8%-8.4%), 164% in MT pts (8.1%-21.4%) and by 367.8% in no-intervention pts (0.5%-2.3%). Risks increased with age but only in tPA pts and did not vary by sex in both tPA and MT pts after multivariate adjustment. SICH was associated with >200% increased odds of ventilator use, pneumonia, sepsis, acute renal failure, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and 67% reduced odds of home disposition compared to non-SICH. Mortality in SICH decreased from 26% to 18.3% compared to 6.1% to 4.0% in the non-SICH patients over the entire period. SICH was associated with >$8,000 increase in cost and >3-day increase in mean LOS. Conclusion: The burden of SICH in AIS is growing. Innovative strategies are needed to prevent SICH and/or alleviate its sequelae.

Abstract P872: Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Y Sun ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Michelle P Lin ◽  
Steven Cen ◽  
Nerses Sanossian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Pronounced Increase ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
To Receive

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was approved for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) 25 yrs ago, yet few AIS patients receive it, with inequities by race/ethnicity, sex, and geography. With expanding evidence-based programs, we hypothesized increases in IVT utilization and reduction in inequities. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we assessed temporal trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for AIS (weighted N=6,694,081) by sex, race/ethnicity, age, insurance, and hospital location/teaching status strata using survey - weighted logistic regression. Covariates included socio-demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We calculated odds ratios for IVT by each category in 2002-2008 and 2009-2015. Results: IVT for AIS increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015, with an overall adjusted annual relative ratio (AARR) of 1.15 (CI 1.14-1.16). Individuals 18-44 yrs had the highest rate of IVT in 2015. The very elderly (≥85 yrs) had the most pronounced increase in IVT (AARR 1.18, CI 1.17-1.19). The sex disparity in IVT improved, but in 2009-2015, women were still 6% less likely to receive IVT than men (Fig 1). Individuals 18-44 yrs were ~3-fold more likely to receive IVT than the very elderly. IVT inequities for black and Hispanic stroke survivors lessened, but blacks remained ~20% less likely than whites to receive IVT. Government-insured patients were ~25% less likely to receive IVT compared to privately insured. Urban AIS patients were up to 4-fold more likely to receive IVT than rural dwellers. Conclusion: From 2002 through 2015, IVT for AIS in the U.S. increased regardless of race/ethnicity, sex, and age among ≥18 yrs, with the most pronounced increase among the very elderly. Despite encouraging trends, only 1 in 15 AIS patients received IVT and persistent inequities remain for blacks, women, government-insured, and rural stroke survivors, highlighting the need for intensifying stroke literacy and preparedness and enhancing systems of care.

Abstract WP54: National Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Pre- and Post-Stent Retriever Era in the United States

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib A Chaudhry ◽  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Iqra N Akhtar ◽  
Mohammad Rauf A Chaudhry ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Severe Disability ◽  
Stroke Patients

Introduction: Several studies have shown improved outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy in clinical trials after introduction of stent retrievers. The outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular treatment in general practice are expected to improve. We performed this analysis to evaluate trends in utilization of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke and associated rates of death and disability in real world practice. Methods: We obtained data for patients admitted with primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke in United States from 2009-2016 using Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We determined the rate and pattern of utilization, and associated in-hospital outcomes of endovascular treatment among them. Outcomes were classified as minimal disability, moderate to severe disability, and death based on discharge disposition and compared between two time periods: 2009-2011 and 2013-2016 to represent pre and post stent retriever approvals in United States. Results: Of the 3,780,955 patients admitted with ischemic stroke, 244,092 (6.46%) received intravenous thrombolytic treatment, and 48,409 (1.28%) underwent endovascular treatment. There was a fourfold increase in patients who underwent endovascular treatment (0.55% of ischemic strokes in 2009 vs. 2.03% in 2016, trend p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, thrombolytic therapy, in hospital complications including secondary intracranial hemorrhages, the rate of none to minimal disability improved between the two study intervals (2009-2011 versus 2013-2016), odds ratio (OR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.67, p=<0.0001) and moderate to severe disability decreased (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45- 0.70, p= <0.0001). There was significant decrease inpatient mortality for patients treated during 2013-2016; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.56- 0.79, p= <0.0001). Conclusion: There has been a significant increase in the proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients receiving endovascular treatment with improvement of outcomes. Our analysis support generalizability of the successful results observed in clinical trials of endovascular treatment in the post-stent retriever approval era in United States.

Abstract WP284: National Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Thrombolytic Use by Drip and Ship Paradigm in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in United States

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib A Chaudhry ◽  
Mohammad Rauf A Chaudhry ◽  
Mohsain Gill ◽  
Iqra N Akhtar ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Severe Disability ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hospital Outcomes

Background and Purpose: The drip and ship paradigm has rapidly expanded in the last decade allowing higher thrombolytic utilization and endovascular treatment. We performed this analysis to evaluate trends in utilization of drip and ship paradigm in United States and associated outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data for patients admitted with primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the United States from Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest nationally representative data, for the years 2009 to 2015. We studied changes in utilization of drip-and-ship paradigm and subsequent performance of endovascular treatment, and rates of discharge with none to minimal disability and moderate to severe disability. Results: Of the 3,043,190 patients admitted with ischemic stroke, 56,449 (1.85%) patients received thrombolytic treatment through drip-and-ship paradigm over a 7 year period. Of all patients who received thrombolytic treatment (n=243,824), 56,449 (23.15%) received using drip and ship paradigm. There was almost 3 fold increase in drip and ship paradigm (in 0.98% 2009 to 2.80% in 2015 (test for trend= p < 0.001). Among the patients who underwent drip and ship paradigm, 5,061 (8.97%) underwent endovascular treatment. The rate of endovascular treatment increased from 6.62% to 12.39% among patients treated with drip and ship paradigm (test for trend= p < 0.001). The rate of none minimal disability at discharge increased from 39.93% to 47.08%, (test for trend p < 0.001) while moderate to severe disability decreased 51.22% to 47.08%, (test for trend p < 0.001) in ischemic stroke patients treated using drip-and-ship paradigm. Similar trends were observed for hospital outcomes in multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for age, gender, medical comorbidities and secondary intracranial hemorrhages. Conclusion: There has been a significant increase in the proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients treated using drip-and-ship paradigm (out of proportion to overall thrombolytic use) with increase in subsequent endovascular treatment in United States. The in hospital outcomes of patients have improved perhaps due to higher utilization of endovascular treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document