scholarly journals Incidence of COVID-19 Virus Transmission in Three Dental Offices: A 6-Month Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 853-859
Author(s):  
Scott Froum ◽  
Stuart Froum
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serap Aktas Yildirim ◽  
Zeynep Sarikaya ◽  
Halim Ulugol ◽  
Sanem Ozata ◽  
Ugur Aksu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is not known whether emergency surgeries and interventions are safe during the pandemic period. We investigate the effect of surgery and intervention on COVID-19 disease progression, intensive care (ICU) need, mortality, and virus transmission to patients and healthcare workers.Methods This retrospective study was conducted between 20 March -20 May 2020 in six hospitals in Istanbul. Patients were examined in three groups. Group I patients who underwent emergency surgery, Group II patients who underwent emergency nonoperating room intervention, Group III patients who underwent inpatient COVID-19 treatment but did not have any surgery or intervention. During this period, all healthcare workers and patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with any of the symptoms, PCR positivity, or Thorax CT findings were recorded. Patient and healthcare worker transmission, unplanned intensive care need, and death due to COVID-19 were also recorded.Results 1,273 surgical, 476 nonoperating room intervention patients, and 1,884 COVID-19 inpatients were examined. ICU requirement of COVID-19 patients who had surgery was 20 times higher than COVID-19 inpatients and intervention patients but there is no difference in mortality. The total mortality rates were 2.3% in surgical patients, 3.3% in intervention patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and 3% in COVID-19 inpatients. COVID-19 PCR positivity among hospital workers was % 2.4. Only 3.3% of the infected frontline healthcare workers were anesthesiologists. No deaths occurred among infected healthcare workers.Conclusions Emergency surgeries and interventions during the pandemic period did not increase mortality and can be performed safely with very low transmission rates by complying with the effective use of personal protective equipment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Anand Marya ◽  
Adith Venugopal ◽  
Mohmed Isaqali Karobari ◽  
Pietro Messina ◽  
Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina ◽  
...  

In the Southeast Asian region, various policies have been advocated by health regulatory bodies that entail protective measures such as face masks, gloves, maintaining distance in public areas, and more. These protective measures are aimed at helping reverse the growth rate of the coronavirus. Dentists in this region have incorporated several changes to their practices to help minimize risks of person-to-person transmission inside dental offices. This narrative review aimed to provide an in-depth overview of the current situation in the Southeast Asian region regarding the use of teledentistry during the pandemic. Teledentistry involves the transfer of patient information across remote distances for online consultation and treatment planning. A few years back, it used to be a lesser-known entity but has seen an exponential rise in its incorporation into dental practices all around the Association of Southeast Nations (ASEAN) region. Many clinics in the Southeast Asian region have started using online consultations to ensure that patients can be diagnosed or followed up during their treatment. Teledentistry is the clear answer in the coming months as it will help reduce the risk of virus transmission and help patients get access to oral healthcare and dentists to see their patients. This article reviews the current pandemic situation in the ASEAN region, the recent evidence, and the scope of teledentistry. It also provides recommendations for the future and sheds light on the different types of teledentistry and how it can be incorporated into practices by regulatory authorities in this region.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Askarian ◽  
Kamran Mirzaei ◽  
Ojan Assadian

We conducted a cross-sectional survey from October through December 2004 of 8,312 residents of Shiraz, Iran, to investigate Iranians' perceptions about undergoing dental treatment in dental offices where other patients or the dentist and/or dental assistants are infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Most survey respondents (83%) had acceptable general knowledge about the mode of transmission of HIV and about acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); however, many misconceptions were observed. A negative association was detected between the level of concern about contracting HIV/AIDS and the intention to continue treatment in services where patients with HIV/AIDS were also treated or where the dentist and/or dental assistants had HIV/AIDS.


Author(s):  
Navya Sri Sreenivas ◽  
Saraswathi Sakranaik ◽  
Ranganath Thimmanahalli Sobagiah ◽  
Anil Kumar

Background: Rabies is a viral zoonosis. In up to 99% of cases, domestic dogs are responsible for rabies virus transmission to humans. About 30% of the victims of dog bites are children under the age of 15. Ironically, all these problems are preventable by effective vaccination. However, for an ef­fective prevention programme, it is important to un­derstand the epidemiology of animal bite cases. The objective of the study was to assess the epidemiological pattern of animal bite cases attending anti-rabies clinic. Methods: A record based retrospective study was conducted from April to May 2016 by reviewing the records of one year in anti-rabies clinic. Results: In the study out of 2850 bite victims, 78% were males and about 21, 54% were in the age group of 20-29 years. 97% of cases were bitten by dog. Based on area wise distribution majority of the bite victims were from Bangalore west (49.5%), among them 23% was referred for Immunoglobulin. The study also showed that majority of paediatric cases were reported more during the month of April and May. Conclusions: In our study we found that majority of cases were reported among the paediatric age group during summer vacations. Hence education should be given in the community as well in schools for primary prevention of animal bite. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 855.e3
Author(s):  
C. Cannarozzo ◽  
P. Kirch ◽  
L. Campoy ◽  
R. Gleed ◽  
M. Martin-Flores
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
David Broome ◽  
Gauri Bhuchar ◽  
Ehsan Fayazzadeh ◽  
James Bena ◽  
Christian Nasr

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Ghasak Mahmood ◽  
Sylvia J. Shaw ◽  
Yaga Szlachick ◽  
Rod Atkins ◽  
Stefan Bughi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document