The Effect of Different Dental Implant Surface Characteristics on Bone Immunologic Biomarkers and Microbiologic Parameters: A Randomized Clinical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-597
Author(s):  
Bilge Karcı ◽  
Elif Öncü ◽  
Metin Dogan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Dental Implant Surface

scholarly journals The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1641
Author(s):  
Stefanie Kligman ◽  
Zhi Ren ◽  
Chun-Hsi Chung ◽  
Michael Angelo Perillo ◽  
Yu-Cheng Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Bacterial Colonization ◽  
Surface Modifications ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Surface Design ◽  
Polyether Ether Ketone ◽  
Dental Implant Surface ◽  
The Impact

Implant surface design has evolved to meet oral rehabilitation challenges in both healthy and compromised bone. For example, to conquer the most common dental implant-related complications, peri-implantitis, and subsequent implant loss, implant surfaces have been modified to introduce desired properties to a dental implant and thus increase the implant success rate and expand their indications. Until now, a diversity of implant surface modifications, including different physical, chemical, and biological techniques, have been applied to a broad range of materials, such as titanium, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone, to achieve these goals. Ideal modifications enhance the interaction between the implant’s surface and its surrounding bone which will facilitate osseointegration while minimizing the bacterial colonization to reduce the risk of biofilm formation. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss currently available implant surface modifications commonly used in implantology in terms of their impact on osseointegration and biofilm formation, which is critical for clinicians to choose the most suitable materials to improve the success and survival of implantation.

scholarly journals Bioactive Coating on Titanium Dental Implants for Improved Anticorrosion Protection: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study

Coatings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozefina Katić ◽  
Ankica Šarić ◽  
Ines Despotović ◽  
Nives Matijaković ◽  
Marin Petković ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Density Functional ◽  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Electrochemical Impedance ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Titanium Implant ◽  
Attenuated Total Reflection ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Bioactive Coating ◽  
Dental Implant Surface

In recent years, extensive studies have been continuously undertaken on the design of bioactive and biomimetic dental implant surfaces due to the need for improvement of the implant–bone interface properties. In this paper, the titanium dental implant surface was modified by bioactive vitamin D3 molecules by a self-assembly process in order to form an improved anticorrosion coating. Surface characterization of the modified implant was performed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), and contact angle measurements (CA). The implant’s electrochemical stability during exposure to an artificial saliva solution was monitored in situ by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The experimental results obtained were corroborated by means of quantum chemical calculations at the density functional theory level (DFT). The formation mechanism of the coating onto the titanium implant surface was proposed. During a prolonged immersion period, the bioactive coating effectively prevented a corrosive attack on the underlying titanium (polarization resistance in order of 107 Ω cm2) with ~95% protection effectiveness.

scholarly journals Treatments to Optimize Dental Implant Surface Topography and Enhance Cell Bioactivity

10.5772/62682 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaume Miranda-Rius ◽  
Eduard Lahor-Soler ◽  
Lluís Brunet-Llobet ◽  
David de Dios ◽  
Francesc Xavier Gil
Keyword(s):  
Surface Topography ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Dental Implant Surface

Use of Er:YAG Laser to Decontaminate Infected Dental Implant Surface in Preparation for Reestablishment of Bone-to-Implant Contact

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron Nevins ◽  
Marc Nevins ◽  
Atsuhiko Yamamoto ◽  
Toshiaki Yoshino ◽  
Yoshihiro Ono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Dental Implant Surface ◽  
Bone To Implant Contact

scholarly journals Bisphosphonate releasing dental implant surface coatings and osseointegration: A systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shariq Najeeb ◽  
Muhammad S. Zafar ◽  
Zohaib Khurshid ◽  
Sana Zohaib ◽  
Syed M. Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surface Coatings ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Dental Implant Surface

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Treatment Modalities on Dental Implant Surfaces

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav I. Larsen ◽  
Morten Enersen ◽  
Anne Karin Kristoffersen ◽  
Ann Wennerberg ◽  
Dagmar F. Bunæs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Antimicrobial Effect ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Bacterial Strains ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Antimicrobial Effects ◽  
Dental Implant Surface

Resolution of peri-implant inflammation and re-osseointegration of peri-implantitis affected dental implants seem to be dependent on bacterial decontamination. The aims of the study were to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of 3 different instrumentations on a micro-textured dental implant surface contaminated with an avirulent or a virulent Porphyromonas gingivalis strain and to determine alterations to the implant surface following instrumentation. Forty-five dental implants (Straumann SLA) were allocated to 3 treatment groups: Er:YAG laser, chitosan brush, and titanium curette (10 implants each) and a positive (10 implants) and a negative (5 implants) control. Each treatment group and the positive control were split into subgroups of 5 implants subsequently contaminated with either the avirulent or virulent P. gingivalis strain. The antimicrobial effect of instrumentation was evaluated using checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization. Implant surface alterations were determined using a light interferometer. Instrumentation significantly reduced the number of attached P. gingivalis (P < .001) with no significant differences among groups (P = .310). A significant overall higher median score was found for virulent compared with avirulent P. gingivalis strains (P = .007); the Er:YAG laser uniquely effective removing both bacterial strains. The titanium curette significantly altered the implant surface micro-texture. Neither the Er:YAG laser nor the chitosan brush significantly altered the implant surface. The 3 instrumentations appear to have a similar potential to remove P. gingivalis. The titanium curette significantly altered the microstructure of the implant surface.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document