Crestal Bone and Keratinized Tissue Around 3.0-mm Laser-Microtextured Dental Implants After 1 Year in Function: A Case Series

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgard El Chaar ◽  
Shivangi Amin ◽  
Stephanie Cruz ◽  
Natalia Gil-Fernandez ◽  
Steven Engebreston
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Keratinized Tissue

scholarly journals Enxerto gengival livre para correção de defeitos de tecido mole previamente a cirurgias reconstrutivas

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabelle Dias Ribeiro ◽  
Julliana Cariry Palhano Freire ◽  
Jaqueline Oliveira Barreto ◽  
Eduardo Dias Ribeiro ◽  
Ronaldo Lira Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Oral Implants ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Attached Gingiva ◽  
Keratinized Mucosa

A anatomia do tecido mole peri-implantar é semelhante à do dente natural, uma vez que apresenta epitélio juncional e tecido conjuntivo. O selamento peri-implantar é estabelecido pela mucosa ceratinizada que previne a migração apical da margem gengival, mantendo a arquitetura tecidual e estética vermelha ao redor dos implantes osseointegráveis. O presente trabalho objetivou relatar um caso clínico de reconstrução de tecido mole previamente a cirurgia óssea reconstrutiva para a instalação de implante osseointegrável. Após a reconstrução do tecido mole observou-se que houve um satisfatório ganho de altura e espessura tecidual. Foi obtido um volume tecidual suficiente para regularização do zênite gengival e considerável volume de mucosa ceratinizada foi obtida previamente a cirurgia reconstrutiva.Descritores: Implantes Dentários; Periodontia; Reabilitação Bucal.ReferênciasMutthineni RB, Dudala RB, Ramisetty A. Esthetic root coverage with double papillary subepithelial connective tissue graft: a case report. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:509319.Peñarrocha MA, Carrillo C, Boronat A,Martí EM. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary mull-arch fixed protheses: zigomatic versus convencional implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):769-73.Ponsi J, Lahti S, Rissanen H, Oikarinen K. Change in subjective oral health after single dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(3):571-77.Man Y, Wang Y, Qu Y, Wang P, Gong P. A palatal roll envelope technique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(5):660-65.Schneider D, Grunder U, Ender A, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):28-37.Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):73-80.Grover HS, Yadav A, Yadav P, Nanda P. Free gingival grafting to increase the zone of Keratinized tissue around implants. Int J Oral Implant Clinical Res. 2011;2(2):117-20.Almeida JM, Novaes VN, Faleiros PL, Macarimi VC, Bosco AF, Theodoro LH et al. Aumento de gengiva ceratinizada em mucosa peri-implantar. Rev odontol UNESP. 2012;41(5):365-69.Langer B, Langer L. Overlapped flap: a surgical modification for implant fixture installation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10(3):208-15.Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, van Minnen B, Vissink A. Immediate Reconstruction of Failed Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using a Flapless Technique and Autogenous Composite Tuberosity Graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(3):528-33.Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1410-20.Park JC , Yang KB, Choi Y , Kim YT , Jung UW , Kim CS et al. A simple approach to preserve keratinized mucosa around implants using a pre-fabricated implant-retained stent: a report of two cases. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010; 40(4):194-200.Wennström JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(1):1-8. Bengazi F, Wennström JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(4):303-10.Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):323-26.Fu JH, Su CY, Wang HL. Esthetic soft tissue management for teeth and implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(3 Suppl):129-42.Marquez IC. The role of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva in maintaining periodontal/peri-implant health. Gen Dent. 2004;52(1):74-9.

scholarly journals One-Time Cortical Lamina: A New Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation. A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Foti ◽  
Davide Savio ◽  
Roberto Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Fibrin Sealant ◽  
Case Series ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
The One ◽  
Hard Consistency

The aim of this case series is to introduce the One-Time Cortical Lamina Technique, a simplification of the F.I.R.S.T. (Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique) in cases where only horizontal augmentation is needed. The indications for this technique are ASA2 and ASA1 anxious patients. Pre-requisites for this surgical technique are: a good amount of keratinized tissue, sufficient alveolar ridge width for placement of implants, thickness of vestibular bone at CBCT planning less than 1 mm with risk of threads exposure. Five patients with horizontal deficiencies were selected to test the efficacy of this approach. The defects were augmented using a porcine cortical bone lamina in combination with collagenated porcine bone mixed with fibrin sealant. The cortical lamina was placed only buccal to the implants and stabilized with fibrin sealant, without pins or screws. Upon completion of the implant surgery, healing abutments were connected to the implants and the soft tissue sutured around them. The healing was uneventful in all cases. Six months after surgery impressions for final restorations were taken and screwed crowns delivered. The new volume had hard consistency and the follow-up CBCT measured an average of 4.17 mm of horizontal bone augmentation. One to three years of follow up demonstrated the maintenance of vestibular volume, hard consistency and clinical stability. Intraoral X-rays showed no marginal bone loss. An advantage of this technique could be the one stage surgery that creates a stable environment for regeneration from day one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document