Extraction Site Management in the Esthetic Zone Using Autogenous Hard and Soft Tissue Grafts: A 5-Year Consecutive Clinical Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hanser ◽  
Fouad Khoury
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Site Management ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts

scholarly journals Hybrid 3D Printing of Synthetic and Cell‐Laden Bioinks for Shape Retaining Soft Tissue Grafts

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1907145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Van Belleghem ◽  
Leopoldo Torres ◽  
Marco Santoro ◽  
Bhushan Mahadik ◽  
Arley Wolfand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts

Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using a Two-step Approach with Different Soft Tissue Grafts: A Clinical Report

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Walter ◽  
Leonard Büttel ◽  
Roland Weiger
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts

Abstract Aim The purpose of this report is to present the use of different soft tissue grafting procedures for surgical ridge augmentation. Background Multiple augmentative procedures may be indicated for the esthetic reconstruction of edentulous alveolar ridge deformities due to unpredictable shrinkage of augmented tissues. Report A 38-year-old woman with a moderate Class III alveolar ridge defect received periodontal plastic surgery treatment using a combined onlay-interpositional graft procedure and a subepithelial connective tissue graft. Summary This case illustrates the aesthetic reconstruction of a moderate alveolar ridge defect using a twostep approach. Clinical Significance Using different soft tissue grafting procedures might be helpful in planning and treating moderate alveolar ridge defects. The time for remodelling of the augmented tissues needs to be respected before the final prosthesis is placed. Citation Walter C, Büttel L, Weiger R. Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using a Two-step Approach with Different Soft Tissue Grafts: A Clinical Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:099-106.

scholarly journals Stem Cell-Based Soft Tissue Grafts for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeries

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Stosich ◽  
Jeremy J Mao
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts

scholarly journals Soft tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation using different sealing materials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Canullo ◽  
Paolo Pesce ◽  
Donato Antonacci ◽  
Andrea Ravidà ◽  
Matthew Galli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts ◽  
Sealing Materials

Abstract Background Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is a proactive treatment option aiming at attenuating post-extraction hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. A high number of different types of biomaterials have been utilized during ARP to seal the socket, but their effectiveness in terms of soft tissue outcomes has rarely been investigated and compared in the literature. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different types of membranes and graft materials in terms of soft tissue outcomes (keratinized tissue width changes, vertical buccal height, and horizontal changes) after ARP, and to assign relative rankings based on their performance. Materials and methods The manuscript represents the proceedings of a consensus conference of the Italian Society of Osseointegration (IAO). PUBMED (Medline), SCOPUS, Embase, and Cochrane Oral Health’s Information Specialist were utilized to conduct the search up to 06 April 2021. English language restrictions were placed and no limitations were set on publication date. Randomized controlled trials that report ARP procedures using different sealing materials, assessing soft tissue as a primary or secondary outcome, with at least 6-week follow‐up were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using mean, standard deviation, sample size, bias, and follow-up duration for all included studies. Network geometry, contribution plots, inconsistency plots, predictive and confidence interval plots, SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) rankings, and multidimensional (MDS) ranking plots were constructed. Results A total of 11 studies were included for NMA. Overall, the level of bias for included studies was moderate. Crosslinked collagen membranes (SUCRA rank 81.8%) performed best in vertical buccal height (VBH), autogenous soft tissue grafts (SUCRA rank 89.1%) in horizontal width change (HWch), and control (SUCRA rank 85.8%) in keratinized mucosa thickness (KMT). Conclusions NMA confirmed that the use of crosslinked collagen membranes and autogenous soft tissue grafts represented the best choices for sealing sockets during ARP in terms of minimizing post-extraction soft tissue dimensional shrinkage. Clinical relevance Grafting materials demonstrated statistically significantly better performances in terms of soft tissue thickness and vertical buccal height changes, when covered with crosslinked collagen membranes. Instead, soft tissue grafts performed better in horizontal width changes. Non-crosslinked membranes and other materials or combinations presented slightly inferior outcomes.

scholarly journals Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Blašković ◽  
Dorotea Blašković
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Prosthetic Rehabilitation ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Donor Region ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Keratinized Mucosa ◽  
Soft Tissue Grafts ◽  
Augmentation Procedure

The peri-implant soft tissue (PIS) augmentation procedure has become an integral part of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. Minimal width of keratinized mucosa (KM) of 2 mm is deemed necessary to facilitate oral hygiene maintenance around the implant and provide hard and soft peri-implant tissue stability. PIS thickness of at least 2 mm is recommended to achieve the esthetic appearance and prevent recessions around implant prosthetic rehabilitation. The autogenous soft tissue grafts can be divided into two groups based on their histological composition—free gingival graft (FGG) and connective tissue graft (CTG). FGG graft is used mainly to increase the width of keratinized mucosa while CTG augment the thickness of PIS. Both grafts are harvested from the same anatomical region—the palate. Alternatively, they can be harvested from the maxillary tuberosity. Soft tissue grafts can be also harvested as pedicle grafts, in case when the soft tissue graft remains attached to the donor site by one side preserving the blood supply from the donor region. Clinically this will result in less shrinkage of the graft postoperatively, improving the outcome of the augmentation procedure. To bypass the drawback connected with FGG or CTG harvesting, substitutional soft tissue grafts have been developed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document