Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Poorly Controlled HbA1c Values: A Long-Term Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Adi Lorean ◽  
Hila Ziv-On ◽  
Vladimir Perlis ◽  
Zeev Ormianer
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Variables Around Implant With Simultaneous Graft Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated With Different Hypoglycemic Medications: A Retrospective Study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaojie Shi ◽  
Feng Ding ◽  
Xiangdong Liu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Xingxing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Hypoglycemic Agents ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Insulin Group ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Abstract Background: The clinical and radiographic variables around dental implants in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with different hypoglycemic agents still remained unclear.Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected the dental records and digital periapical radiographs of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and implants. These patients were grouped according to their medication: insulin, metformin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 drugs. The radiographic marginal bone loss around implants and clinical parameters, including peri-implant bleeding on probing and probing depth, were compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: A total of 150 patients with 308 implants (101 in insulin group, 121 in metformin group and 86 in glucagon-like peptide-1 drugs group) were assessed. The peri-implants marginal bone loss in insulin group (P<0.05) and metformin group (P<0.01) were significantly higher than glucagon-like peptide-1 drug group. The radiographic bone loss in metformin was higher than insulin group (P<0.05). While there was no statistical difference of clinical peri-implant parameters among groups(P>0.05).Conclusions: The radiographic variables were not exactly the same among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with different hypoglycemic agents. glucagon-like peptide-1 drugs might be more beneficial to bone tissue around implants. More studies are needed to verify the direct effect of these drugs on peri-implant bone.Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2000034211 (retrospectively registered)

scholarly journals Crestal Bone Loss Around Submerged and Non-Submerged Dental Implants in Individuals with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 7-Year Prospective Clinical Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Al Zahrani ◽  
Abdullah A. Al Mutairi
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Haemoglobin A1c ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Objective: In establishing an evidence-based rationale for the optimal use of implant therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), it is essential to first understand the impact of glycemic control on early healing and the success of dental implants. The objective of this study was to evaluate crestal bone loss (CBL) and stability around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in Saudi patients with well- and poorly controlled T2DM. Subject and Methods: Thirty-five patients with well-controlled T2DM (24 males and 11 females) and 32 poorly controlled T2DM patients (19 males and 13 females) were included. CBL was measured on digital radiographs; resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were made for each implant at the time of fixture placement and at 3 months in both the groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 124 dental implants were placed. Mean RFA values between baseline and 3 months in poorly controlled T2DM patients was statistically significant (p = 0.048). CBL at first year (p = 0.047), second year (p = 0.041), third year (p = 0.046), and seventh year (p = 0.035) was significantly worse in poorly controlled T2DM. CBL around non-submerged dental implants showed statistically significant differences at all time-intervals (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Poorly controlled T2DM patients present worse peri-implant bone outcomes as compared to patients with well-controlled T2DM. We suggest that the predictability of successful dental implant therapy outcomes depends on the maintenance of optimal haemoglobin A1c levels.

scholarly journals Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alexandre Soares Andrade ◽  
João Lucas Carvalho Paz ◽  
Gabriel Simino de Melo ◽  
Nour Mahrouseh ◽  
Alessandro Lourenço Januário ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the survival rate, success rate, and peri-implant biological changes of immediately loaded dental implants (ILs) placed in type 2 diabetic patients (DM2). Materials and methods The present study was registered on PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA checklist. The search was performed by the first reviewer in January 2021. The electronic databases used were MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature. The risk of bias analysis was performed using an instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results A total of 3566 titles and abstracts were obtained. The qualitative synthesis included 7 studies, while the quantitative synthesis included 5 studies. The meta-analysis of IL in individuals with DM2 compared to nondiabetic individuals showed no significant difference among the groups regarding the survival rate of dental implants (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.96–1.04; p = 0.91; I2 = 0%), even if the patient had poor glycemic control (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.87–1.33; p = 0.48; I2 = 70%). Meta-analysis of marginal bone loss in IL compared to conventional loading in DM2 patients also showed no significant difference (mean difference =  − 0.08, 95% CI − 0.25–0.08; p = 0.33; I2 = 83%). Conclusions Type 2 diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a risk factor for immediately loaded implants if the glycemic level is controlled, the oral hygiene is satisfactory, and the technical steps are strictly followed. Clinical relevance Rehabilitation in diabetic individuals is more common due to the highest prevalence of edentulism in this population. It is essential to establish appropriate protocols for loading dental implants.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Patients (Pts) with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Inadequately Controlled with Metformin (MET) Monotherapy—104-Week VERTIS MET Trial

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1129-P
Author(s):  
SILVINA GALLO ◽  
BERNARD CHARBONNEL ◽  
ALLISON GOLDMAN ◽  
HARRY SHI ◽  
SUSAN HUYCK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Term Efficacy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document