scholarly journals Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Full-Arch Implant-Supported Zirconia-Based and Metal-Acrylic Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayan Barootchi ◽  
Houssam Askar ◽  
Andrea Ravidà ◽  
Jordi Gargallo-Albiol ◽  
Suncica Travan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of computer‐guided versus conventional implant‐retained hybrid prostheses: A long‐term retrospective analysis of treatment protocols

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 1015-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ravidà ◽  
Shayan Barootchi ◽  
Mustafa Tattan ◽  
Muhammad H. A. Saleh ◽  
Jordi Gargallo‐Albiol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Protocols

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants versus Fixed Dental Prostheses

2013 ◽  
Vol 92 (12_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183S-188S ◽  
Author(s):  
N.U. Zitzmann ◽  
G. Krastl ◽  
R. Weiger ◽  
S. Kühl ◽  
P. Sendi
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

scholarly journals The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Blatz ◽  
M. Vonderheide ◽  
J. Conejo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Partial Coverage ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Resin Bonding

Digital manufacturing, all-ceramics, and adhesive dentistry are currently the trendiest topics in clinical restorative dentistry. Tooth- and implant-supported fixed restorations from computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)–fabricated high-strength ceramics—namely, alumina and zirconia—are widely accepted as reliable alternatives to traditional metal-ceramic restorations. Most recent developments have focused on high-translucent monolithic full-contour zirconia restorations, which have become extremely popular in a short period of time, due to physical strength, CAD/CAM fabrication, and low cost. However, questions about proper resin bonding protocols have emerged, as they are critical for clinical success of brittle ceramics and treatment options that rely on adhesive bonds, specifically resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses or partial-coverage restorations such as inlays/onlays and veneers. Resin bonding has long been the gold standard for retention and reinforcement of low- to medium-strength silica-based ceramics but requires multiple pretreatment steps of the bonding surfaces, increasing complexity, and technique sensitivity compared to conventional cementation. Here, we critically review and discuss the evidence on resin bonding related to long-term clinical outcomes of tooth- and implant-supported high-strength ceramic restorations. Based on a targeted literature search, clinical long-term studies indicate that porcelain-veneered alumina or zirconia full-coverage crowns and fixed dental prostheses have high long-term survival rates when inserted with conventional cements. However, most of the selected studies recommend resin bonding and suggest even greater success with composite resins or self-adhesive resin cements, especially for implant-supported restorations. High-strength ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses have high long-term clinical success rates, especially when designed as a cantilever with only 1 retainer. Proper pretreatment of the bonding surfaces and application of primers or composite resins that contain special adhesive monomers are necessary. To date, there are no clinical long-term data on resin bonding of partial-coverage high-strength ceramic or monolithic zirconia restorations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document