Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Wessing ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Werner Zechner
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Collagen Membranes

scholarly journals Evaluation of Bone Gain and Complication Rates after Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Foils: A Systematic Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5346
Author(s):  
Elisabet Roca-Millan ◽  
Enric Jané-Salas ◽  
Albert Estrugo-Devesa ◽  
José López-López
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Native Bone ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Bone Gain

Guided bone regeneration techniques are increasingly used to enable the subsequent placement of dental implants. This systematic review aims to analyze the success rate of these techniques in terms of bone gain and complications rate using titanium membranes as a barrier element. Electronic and hand searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases for case reports, case series, cohort studies and clinical trials in humans published up to and including 19 September 2020. Thirteen articles were included in the qualitative analysis. Bone gain both horizontally and vertically was comparable to that obtained with other types of membranes more commonly used. The postoperative complication rate was higher that of native collagen membranes and non-resorbable titanium-reinforced membranes, and similar that of crosslinked collagen membranes and titanium meshes. The survival rate of the implants was similar to that of implants placed in native bone. Due to the limited scientific literature published on this issue, more randomized clinical trials comparing occlusive titanium barriers and other types of membranes are necessary to reach more valid conclusions.

scholarly journals Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Garcia ◽  
Austin Dodge ◽  
Paul Luepke ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang ◽  
Yvonne Kapila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Membrane Exposure

scholarly journals Collagen vs expanded polytetrafluorethylene membranes during guided-bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement – a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Sales Antônio Barbosa Junior ◽  
Angélica Maroli ◽  
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira ◽  
Atais Bacchi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Implant Placement

Objetivo: Esta revisão sistemática avaliou a influência do tipo de membrana (colágeno reabsorvível ou politetrafluoretileno expandido não reabsorvível; e-PTFE) na regeneração óssea guia associada à colocação do implante. Métodos: Qualquer tipo de estudo clínico ou revisão de literatura foi pesquisada nas bases de dados MEDLINE / PubMed e Cochrane. Dois revisores independentes examinaram títulos / resumos de artigos e o texto completo de estudos potencialmente elegíveis. Quando os dados estavam disponíveis, a meta-análise pareada foi realizada usando modelo estatístico aleatório. Resultados: Nove estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão, considerando 685 implantes em 360 pacientes. A regeneração óssea vertical não diferiu com o uso das duas membranas em 8 dos 9 estudos incluídos. Meta-análise não mostrou maior ganho ósseo vertical ou perda óssea vertical após a regeneração com qualquer uma das membranas. Os resultados mostraram uma tendência de maior ganho ósseo na regeneração óssea guiada horizontal com membranas de e-PTFE não reabsorvíveis (relatadas por 2 de 3 estudos). Todos os estudos mostraram claramente que ambas as membranas foram eficazes no aumento do volume ósseo. Não houve uma tendência clara de qualquer uma das duas membranas em causar mais complicações. Conclusão: o colágeno reabsorvível e as membranas não-reabsorvíveis de PTFE-e são igualmente eficazes na regeneração óssea guiada vertical; no entanto, a regeneração óssea guiada horizontal parece se beneficiar com o uso das membranas não reabsorvíveis. Ambas as membranas mostraram-se eficazes na regeneração óssea guiada e similares em relação às complicações.

scholarly journals Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Sbricoli ◽  
Riccardo Guazzo ◽  
Marco Annunziata ◽  
Luca Gobbato ◽  
Eriberto Bressan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Barrier Membranes ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Collagen Versus ◽  
The Right ◽  
Grafting Materials ◽  
Selection Of

Several treatment modalities have been proposed to regenerate bone, including guided bone regeneration (GBR) where barrier membranes play an important role by isolating soft tissue and allowing bone to grow. Not all membranes biologically behave the same way, as they differ from their origin and structure, with reflections on their mechanical properties and on their clinical performance. Collagen membranes have been widely used in medicine and dentistry, because of their high biocompatibility and capability of promoting wound healing. Recently, collagen membranes have been applied in guided bone regeneration with comparable outcomes to non-resorbable membranes. Aim of this work is to provide a review on the main features, application, outcomes, and clinical employment of the different types of collagen membranes. Comparisons with non-resorbable membranes are clarified, characteristics of cross-linked collagen versus native collagen, use of different grafting materials and need for membrane fixation are explored in order to gain awareness of the indications and limits and to be able to choose the right membrane required by the clinical condition.

scholarly journals The influence of acetylsalicylic acid in bone regeneration: systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Edelcio Rendohl ◽  
Luciano Miziara ◽  
Angelica Pimentel ◽  
Wilson Sendyk ◽  
Joel Santiago Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acetylsalicylic Acid ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document