Cellular, Vascular, and Histomorphometric Outcomes of Solvent-Dehydrated vs Freeze-Dried Allogeneic Graft for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Case Series

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Francisco O’Valle ◽  
Florencio Monje-Gil ◽  
Inmaculada Ortega-Oller ◽  
Francisco Mesa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Freeze Dried

Clinical and Histologic Outcomes After the Use of a Novel Allograft for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Avila ◽  
Rodrigo Neiva ◽  
Carl E. Misch ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno ◽  
Erika Benavides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Freeze-dried bone for maxillary sinus augmentation in sheep

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Haas ◽  
Daniela Haidvogl ◽  
Orhun Dörtbudak ◽  
Georg Mailath
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Freeze Dried

Microscope-Assisted Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-537
Author(s):  
Benyapha Sirinirund ◽  
Hsun-Laing Chan ◽  
Diego Velasquez
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Biphasic hydroxyapatite and ß‐tricalcium phosphate biomaterial behavior in a case series of maxillary sinus augmentation in humans

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allinson Olaechea ◽  
Gerardo Mendoza‐Azpur ◽  
Francisco O´Valle ◽  
Miguel Padial‐Molina ◽  
Natividad Martin‐Morales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Tricalcium Phosphate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

scholarly journals Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Model after 6-Month Healing

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo La Monaca ◽  
Giovanna Iezzi ◽  
Maria Paola Cristalli ◽  
Nicola Pranno ◽  
Gian Luca Sfasciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Histomorphometric Analysis ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Bone Biopsies

Objectives. To evaluate the performances of six different bone substitute materials used as graft in maxillary sinus augmentation by means of histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies retrieved from human subjects after a 6-month healing period. Materials and Methods. Six consecutive patients (3 males, 3 females, aged 50-72 years), healthy, nonsmokers, and with good oral hygiene, presenting edentulous posterior maxilla with a residual bone crest measuring ≤ 4 mm in vertical height and 3 to 5 mm in horizontal thickness at radiographic examination, were selected to receive sinus augmentation and delayed implant placement. Under randomized conditions, sinus augmentation procedures were carried out using mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft (MCBA), freeze-dried mineralized bone allograft (FDBA), anorganic bovine bone (ABB), equine-derived bone (EB), synthetic micro-macroporous biphasic calcium-phosphate block consisting of 70% beta-tricalcium phosphate and 30% hydroxyapatite (HA-β-TCP 30/70), or bioapatite-collagen (BC). After 6 months, bone core biopsies were retrieved and 13 implants were placed. Bone samples were processed for histological and histomorphometric analysis. CT scans were taken before and after surgery. After 4 months of healing, patients were restored with a provisional fixed acrylic resin prosthesis, as well as after further 2-4 months with a definitive cemented zirconia or porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. Results. There were no postoperative complications or implant failures. The histological examination showed that all biomaterials were in close contact with newly formed bone, surrounding the graft granules with a bridge-like network. No signs of acute inflammation were observed. The histomorphometry revealed 20.1% newly formed bone for MCBA, 32.1% for FDBA, 16.1% for ABB, 22.8% for EB, 20.3% for HA-β-TCP 30/70, and 21.4% for BC. Conclusions. Within the limitations of the present investigation, all the six tested biomaterials showed good biocompatibility and osteoconductive properties when used in sinus augmentation procedures, although the FDBA seemed to have a better histomorphometric result in terms of newly formed bone and residual graft material. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (Registration Number): NCT03496688.

scholarly journals Effect of staged crestal maxillary sinus augmentation: A case series

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Sonoda ◽  
Kensuke Yamamichi ◽  
Takehiro Harada ◽  
Nobuyuki Yamamichi
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document