Accuracy of Linear Measurements Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Panoramic Radiography in Dental Implant Treatment Planning

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1287-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penporn Luangchana ◽  
Suchaya Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri ◽  
Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen ◽  
Bundhit Jirajariyavej
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Implant Treatment

Indications and Frequency for the Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Implant Treatment Planning in a Specialty Clinic

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1076-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bornstein ◽  
Odette Brügger ◽  
Simone Janner ◽  
Ulrike Kuchler ◽  
Vivianne Chappuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Specialty Clinic ◽  
Implant Treatment

scholarly journals ASSESSMENT OF JAW BONE DENSITY IN TERMS OF HOUNSFIELD UNITS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR DENTAL IMPLANT TREATMENT PLANNING

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-27
Author(s):  
Myra Ahmad ◽  
Yasir Ikram Ahmed ◽  
Farheen Qureshi ◽  
Muhammad Sharjeel Ashraf ◽  
Zubair Ahmed Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Hounsfield Units ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Mandible ◽  
Implant Treatment

Objective: To assess jawbone density in terms of Hounsfield units using cone beam computed tomography fordental implant treatment planning in patients reporting to a local tertiary care dental hospital Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, from Mar to Sep 2018. Methodology: A total of 100 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and underwent implant placement wereincluded in the study. After ethical approval, informed and written consent, brief history was taken and a singleradiographer exposed and took cone beam computed tomography scan of all the subjects using PLANMECAmachine. A single investigator using PLANMECA software recorded jawbone density in terms of Hounsfieldunits. All data were presented as mean, SD and one way ANOVA was used. Multiple comparisons of the fourregions in the maxilla and mandible were performed with a Tukey test. An independent t-test was also used tocompare gender with age groups and bone density. Results: Total of 100 patients who underwent implant placement were included, 48 (48%) were males & 52 (52%) were females with the mean age of 28.53 ± 5.33 years. The mean jawbone density in terms of Hounsfield units using cone beam computed tomography in anterior maxilla was 709.75 ± 122.63 Hounsfield units, posterior maxilla was 299.66 ± 73.09 Hounsfield units, anterior mandible was 1093.34 ± 109.42 Hounsfield units and posterior mandible was 599.45 ± 135.55 Hounsfield units (p<.001). Conclusion: The anterior mandible and anterior...........

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document