Retrospective Clinical Study of Single-Retainer Cantilever Anterior and Posterior Glass-Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses at a Mean Follow-up of 6 Years

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Tom Bonani ◽  
Urs Brodbeck ◽  
Christoph Hammerle
2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1229-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Mangano ◽  
Flavia Iaculli ◽  
Adriano Piattelli ◽  
Francesco Mangano

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Augusti ◽  
Gabriele Augusti ◽  
Andrea Borgonovo ◽  
Massimo Amato ◽  
Dino Re

Different indirect restorations to replace a single missing tooth in the posterior region are available in dentistry: traditional full-coverage fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), implant-supported crowns (ISC), and inlay-retained FDPs (IRFDP). Resin bonded FDPs represent a minimally invasive procedure; preexisting fillings can minimize tooth structure removal and give retention to the IRFDP, transforming it into an ultraconservative option. New high strength zirconia ceramics, with their stiffness and high mechanical properties, could be considered a right choice for an IRFDP rehabilitation. The case report presented describes an IRFDP treatment using a CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia IRFDP; clinical and laboratory steps are illustrated, according to the most recent scientific protocols. Adhesive procedures are focused on the Y-TZP and tooth substrate conditioning methods. Nice esthetic and functional integration of indirect restoration at two-year follow-up confirmed the success of this conservative approach.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 3006-3009
Author(s):  
Sorin Gheorghe Mihali ◽  
Emanuel Adrian Bratu ◽  
Laura Cristina Rusu

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the composite pressed on metal framework for full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in order to eliminate the drawbacks related to the chipping of porcelain fused to metal or to zirconia restorations. Sixteen patients received 22 implant-supported screw-cement-retained complete-arch restorations, consisting of composite pressed restorations. All patients were follow-up visit up to 2 years on function (range 24 to 30 months, mean 28.3 months). The outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival rates and calculations of wear determination (mm). After two years of function, the wear values were 95.54�6.88 mm on pressed composite restoration. Using composite pressed restorations appears to be a predictable, esthetic and successful treatment option for method of full arch restorations over implants.


Urologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3_2019 ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
S.V. Popov Popov ◽  
I.N. Orlov Orlov ◽  
A.G. Martov Martov ◽  
S.M. Malevich Malevich ◽  
I.V. Sushina Sushina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document