scholarly journals High-Grade Atrioventricular Nodal Block: An Unusual Presentation of COVID-19 Infection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Sadeq Tabatabai ◽  
Mosaad Abushabana ◽  
Jasem Mohammed Alhashmi ◽  
Hosam Zaky

While respiratory system disease, including pneumonia, remains the principal clinical presentation, several cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) including myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and tachyarrhythmias were reported. We present an unusual case of fatal high-grade atrioventricular nodal block in a young adult male with COVID-19 infection in the occurrence of normal coronary arteries. Marked inflammatory response and myocarditis are the most likely contributing factors to electrical conduction system disturbance. It is appropriate for the clinicians to be aware of the fact that COVID-19 can atypically present as bradyarrhythmia and conduction abnormalities.

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. S1770-S1770
Author(s):  
Andrew Dam ◽  
Andrew Shenouda ◽  
George Shenouda ◽  
Alok Shrestha ◽  
Javier Sobrado

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Vavlukis ◽  
Daniela Pop-Gjorceva ◽  
Lidija Poposka ◽  
Emilija Sandevska ◽  
Sasko Kedev

Background: Accelerated atherosclerosis is widely present in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Objective: The aim of this review is to analyze the relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus and cardiovascular diseases, with the emphasis on acute myocardial infarction. Results: Various molecular mechanisms triggered by infection/inflammation are responsible for endothelial dysfunction and development of atherosclerosis at an earlier age. Contributing factor is the cumulative effect of traditional cardiovascular risk factors interaction with disease related characteristics. Myocardial infarction rates are 2- to 10-fold higher compared to the general population. Young women have the highest relative risk, however, men carry at least 3- fold higher risk than women. Coronary involvement varies from normal coronary artery with thrombosis, coronary microartery vasculitis, coronary arteritis, and coronary atherosclerosis. Typical clinical presentation is observed in men and older women, while atypical is more frequent in young women. Treatment is guided by the underlying mechanism, engaging invasive procedures alone, or accompanied with immunosuppressive and/or antiinflammatory therapy. There are significant gender differences in pathophysiology and clinical presentation. However, they receive the same therapeutic treatments. Conclusion: Systemic lupus erythematosus is a major contributor to atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic mechanisms involved in the development of myocardial infarction, which should be taken into account during therapeutic treatment. Although Systemic lupus erythematosus per se is a “female” disease, males are at increased cardiovascular risk and worse outcome. Method: We conducted a literature review through PubMed and Cochrane, using key words: SLE, atherosclerosis, atherothrombosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, prognosis, sex specifics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulla Shehab ◽  
Khalid F. AlHabib ◽  
Akshaya S. Bhagavathula ◽  
Ahmad Hersi ◽  
Hussam Alfaleh ◽  
...  

Background: Most of the available literature on ST-Elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) in women was conducted in the developed world and data from Middle-East countries was limited. Aims: To examine the clinical presentation, patient management, quality of care, risk factors and inhospital outcomes of women with acute STEMI compared with men using data from a large STEMI registry from the Middle East. Methods: Data were derived from the third Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-3Ps), a prospective, multinational study of adults with acute STEMI from 36 hospitals in 6 Middle-Eastern countries. The study included 2928 patients; 296 women (10.1%) and 2632 men (89.9%). Clinical presentations, management and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Women were 10 years older and more likely to have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia compared with men who were more likely to be smokers (all p<0.001). Women had longer median symptom-onset to emergency department (ED) arrival times (230 vs. 170 min, p<0.001) and ED to diagnostic ECG (8 vs. 6 min., p<0.001). When primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed, women had longer door-to-balloon time (DBT) (86 vs. 73 min., p=0.009). When thrombolytic therapy was not administered, women were less likely to receive PPCI (69.7 vs. 76.7%, p=0.036). The mean duration of hospital stay was longer in women (6.03 ± 22.51 vs. 3.41 ± 19.45 days, p=0.032) and the crude in-hospital mortality rate was higher in women (10.4 vs. 5.2%, p<0.001). However, after adjustments, multivariate analysis revealed a statistically non-significant trend of higher inhospital mortality among women than men (6.4 vs. 4.6%), (p=0.145). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that women in our region have almost double the mortality from STEMI compared with men. Although this can partially be explained by older age and higher risk profiles in women, however, correction of identified gaps in quality of care should be attempted to reduce the high morbidity and mortality of STEMI in our women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Mitsis ◽  
Felice Gragnano

Abstract:: Understanding the similarities and differences between myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation is an essential step for a proper patients’ management in current practice. Both syndromes are caused by a critical stenosis or a total occlusion of coronary arteries (mostly due to thrombosis on atherosclerotic plaque), and manifest with a similar clinical presentation. Recent epidemiologic studies show that the relative incidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) moves in an opposite fashion (decreasing and increasing respectively), with a prognosis that is worse at short-term follow-up for STEMI but comparable at long-term. Current management differs, as for STEMIs an immediate reperfusion is recommended, while for NSTEMIs risk stratification is mandatory in order to stratify patients’ risk, and then decide the timing for coronary angiography. Periprocedural and technical aspects of the interventional management as well antithrombotic medications are for the most similarly implemented in the two types of MI, with routine radial access, DES implant, and novel P2Y12 inhibitors representing the standard of care in both cases. The following review article aims to compare the two types of MI, with and without persistent ST-segment elevation. The main purpose is to explore their similarities and differences and address areas of uncertainty with regards to clinical presentation, therapeutic management, and prognosis. The identification of high-risk NSTEMI patients is important as they may require an individualised approach that can substantially overlap with current STEMI recommendations and their mortality remains high if their management is delayed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Piatek ◽  
L Zandecki ◽  
J Kurzawski ◽  
A Janion-Sadowska ◽  
M Zabojszcz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Both unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are still classified together in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes despite the fact they substantially differ in both clinical profile and prognosis. Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate contemporary clinical characteristics and outcomes of UA patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with stable angina (SCAD) and myocardial infarction (NSTEMI as well as STEMI) in Swietokrzyskie District of Poland in years 2014–2017. Methods A total of 7'187 patients after PCI from ORPKI Registry (38% with diagnosis of UA) were included into the analysis. Impact of clinical presentation (UA, SCAD, NSTEMI, STEMI) on 3-year outcomes were determined. Results UA patients were older that SCAD but younger than NSTEMI individuals. Diabetes and hypertension were more often encountered into UA group than in NSTEMI but less often than in SCAD cases. In UA group the percentage of previous myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the highest among all analyzed groups. In 3-year observation the risk of death as well as myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in unstable angina after PCI was higher than in stable angina but considerably lower than in NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognosis in NSTEMI was substantially worse in comparison with UA (RR 1.365, 95% CI: 1.126–1.655, p=0.0015). On the contrary there were no difference in mortality risk between UA and SCAD patients (RR 1.189, 95% CI: 0.932–1.518, p=0.1620). Parallel results were observed in respect of MI and MACE. Independ predictors of death were: age, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke or previous PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analyse Clinical presentation Death Myocardial infarction MACE RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value NSTEMI/UA 1.365 1.126–1.655 0.0015 1.822 1.076–3.055 0.0260 1.514 1.267–1.807 <0.0001 NSTEMI/SCAD 1.624 1.251–2.109 0.0003 1.882 0.982–3.789 0.0568 1.604 1.275–2.094 <0.0001 UA/SCAD 1.189 0.932–1.518 0.1620 1.033 0.557–2.034 0.9219 1.060 0.855–1.323 0.6023 MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina; SCAD, stable angina. Conclusion Unstable angina accounted for 38% of all cases and was the most common diagnosis in patients that underwent PCI in that time. 3-year prognosis in UA was considerable better in comparison with NSTEMI. On contrary there was no difference in outcomes (death, MI, MACE) between UA and SCAD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey Meizinger ◽  
Bruce Klugherz

Abstract Background While it is understood that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily complicated by respiratory failure, more data are emerging on the cardiovascular complications of this disease. A subset of COVID-19 patients present with ST-elevations on electrocardiogram (ECG) yet normal coronary angiography, a presentation that can fit criteria for myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA). There is little known about non-coronary myocardial injury observed in patients with COVID-19, and we present a case that should encourage further conversation and study of this clinical challenge. Case summary An 86-year-old man presented to our institution with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and an ECG showing anteroseptal ST-segment elevation concerning for myocardial infarction. Mechanic ventilation was initiated prior to presentation, and emergent transthoracic echocardiography reported an ejection fraction of 50–55%, with no significant regional wall motion abnormalities. Next, emergent coronary angiography was performed, and no significant coronary artery disease was detected. The patient tested positive for COVID-19. Despite supportive management in the intensive care unit, the patient passed away. Discussion We present a case of COVID-19 that is likely associated with MINOCA. It is crucial to understand that in COVID-19 patients with signs of myocardial infarction, not all myocardial injury is due to obstructive coronary artery disease. In the case of COVID-19 pathophysiology, it is important to consider the cardiovascular effects of hypoxic respiratory failure, potential myocarditis, and significant systemic inflammation. Continued surveillance and research on the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 is essential to further elucidate management and prognosis.


2001 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 707-710
Author(s):  
Masami Kosuge ◽  
Kazuo Kimura ◽  
Toshiyuki Ishikawa ◽  
Tsutomu Endo ◽  
Makoto Shimizu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document