scholarly journals Successful Treatment of Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia in a 26-Year-Old Female Patient

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Marcel Kemper ◽  
Georg Lenz ◽  
Rolf Michael Mesters
Keyword(s):  
Female Patient ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Immunoglobulins ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Improve Patient

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has already been described after vaccination with ChAdOx2 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen). However, less knowledge so far has been gained about optimal therapeutic regimens in VITT-suspected patients. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old female patient, who developed bilateral deep vein thrombosis in the lower legs and severe thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx2 nCov-19 vaccination. After initial anticoagulation therapy regimens including fondaparinux, apixaban, and danaparoid failed, the patient was successfully treated with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in combination with parental anticoagulation therapy with argatroban. As vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 affects billions of people worldwide, medical facilities and hospitals have to be prepared and provide effective treatment options in VITT-suspected patients, including rapid application of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins, to improve patient outcomes.

Phlegmasia cerulea dolens – an uncommon but alarming manifestation of deep vein thrombosis

VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-426
Author(s):  
Manuela Nickler ◽  
Sebastian Haubitz ◽  
Adriana Méndez ◽  
Martin Gissler ◽  
Peter Stierli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Venous Intervention ◽  
Aggressive Treatment ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prompt Treatment ◽  
Surgical Thrombectomy ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens

Summary: In phlegmasia cerulea dolens (PCD), immediate diagnosis and prompt treatment is crucial for limb salvage. Aggressive treatment options including venous intervention, thrombolysis and/or surgical thrombectomy should be considered. Due to the lack of data, the most appropriate intervention depends upon etiology of PCD, clinical presentation and patient’s bleeding risk.

Intensive Initial Oral Anticoagulation and Shorter Heparin Treatment in Deep Vein Thrombosis

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Dieter Lockner ◽  
Kurt Bergström ◽  
Margareta Blombäck
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Heparin Treatment ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryIn order to investigate whether a more intensive initial oral anticoagulation still would be safe and effective, we performed a prospective randomized study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. They received either the conventional regimen of oral anticoagulation (“low-dose”) and heparin or a more intense oral anticoagulation (“high-dose”) with a shorter period of heparin treatment.In the first part of the study 129 patients were randomized. The “low-dose” group reached a stable therapeutic prothrombin complex (PT)-level after 4.3 and the “high-dose” group after 3.3 days. Heparin was discontinued after 6.0 and 5.0 days respectively. There was no difference in significant hemorrhage between the groups, and no clinical signs of progression of the thrombosis.In the second part of the study another 40 patients were randomized, followed with coagulation factor II, VII, IX and X and with repeated venograms. A stable therapeutic PT-level was achieved after 4.4 (“low-dose”) and 3.7 (“high-dose”) days, and heparin was discontinued after 5.4 and 4.4 days respectively. There were no clinical hemorrhages, the activity of the coagulation factors had dropped to the same level in both groups at the time when heparin was discontinued and no thromboembolic complications occurred.Our oral anticoagulation regimen with heparin treatment for an average of 4.4-5 days seems safe and reduces in-patient costs.

scholarly journals The Predictive Value of the aCL and Anti-β2GPI at the Time of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis—A Two-Year Prospective Study

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 901
Author(s):  
Katja Perdan-Pirkmajer ◽  
Polona Žigon ◽  
Anja Boc ◽  
Eva Podovšovnik ◽  
Saša Čučnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). According to current APS classification criteria, APS cannot be confirmed until 24 weeks after DVT. This time frame results in frequent discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment before APS is diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the potential predictive value of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) before discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with newly diagnosed DVT were included into a 24-month prospective study. All patients received anticoagulant therapy. aCL and anti-β2GPI were determined at inclusion and every four weeks for the first 24 weeks and then one and two years after inclusion. APS was confirmed in 24/221 (10.9%) patients. At the time of acute DVT 20/24 (83.3%), APS patients had positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI. Two patients had low aCL levels and two were negative at the time of acute DVT but later met APS criteria due to lupus anticoagulant (LA). Our data indicate that negative aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT make further aPL testing unnecessary; however, LA should be determined after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT have a strong positive predictive value for APS and may support therapeutic decisions.

scholarly journals Inferior Vena Cava Agenesis and Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Pharmacological Alternative to Vitamin K Antagonists

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Esteves Cruz ◽  
Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Raquel Silva ◽  
Francisco Silva ◽  
Isabel Madruga
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Inferior vena cava (IVC) agenesis is a rare congenital abnormality affecting the infrarenal segment, the suprarenal or the whole of the IVC. It has an estimated prevalence of up to 1% in the general population that can rise to 8.7% when abnormalities of the left renal vein are considered. Most IVC malformations are asymptomatic but may be associated with nonspecific symptoms or present as deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Up to 5% of young individuals under 30 years of age with unprovoked DVT are found to have this condition. Regarding the treatment of IVC agenesis-associated DVT, there are no standard guidelines. Treatment is directed towards preventing thrombosis or its recurrence. Low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulation medication, in particular vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the mainstay of therapy. Given the high risk of DVT recurrence in these patients, oral anticoagulation therapy is suggested to be pursued indefinitely. As far as we know, this is the first case reporting the use of a direct factor Xa inhibitor in IVC agenesis-associated DVT. Given VKA monitoring limitations, the use of a direct Xa inhibitor could be an alternative in young individuals with anatomical defects without thrombophilia, but further studies will be needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals Improvement of Medical Treatment Options of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis of Low Extremities Associated with Phlegmasia Alba Dolens

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-198
Author(s):  
Boris Sukovatykh ◽  
Aleksey Viktorovich Sereditsky ◽  
Andrey Mikhailovich Azarov ◽  
Vadim Feliksovich Muradyan ◽  
Mikhail Borisovich Sukovatykh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Outflow ◽  
Partial Restoration ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Phlegmasia Alba ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Deep Vein

The aim of the study was to improve the conservative treatment options for proximal deep vein thrombosis of low extremities associated with phlegmasia alba dolens optimization of anticoagulant therapy and paravascular injection of the anti-inflammatory medical mixture in areas of the most intense inflammatory process.Materials and methods. The results of treatment of two statistically homogeneous groups of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities associated with white phlegmasia were compared. In the first group (n = 30), standard conservative treatment was carried out using rivaroxaban as an anticoagulant; in the second group (n = 30), initial heparin therapy was first performed and, additionally, the following mixture was administered in the places of the greatest severity of inflammatory process under ultrasound control: dexamethasone 16 mg, heparin 5 thousand units, 0.25% novocaine solution 20.0 ml. During treatment the incidence of hemorrhagic syndrome was recorded. The results were assessed after one year according to the degree of deep vein lumen restoration and the severity of venous outflow impairment according to the Villalta scale. Results. In patients of both groups, every tenth patient developed some minor manifestations of hemorrhagic syndrome during treatment with rivaroxaban that was corrected by a decrease in the dose of anticoagulant.Complete restoration of the lumen of the veins occurred in 20.0%, patients of the first group and in 40.0%, patients of the second group; partial, in 63.3% and 56.7% of patients, respectively, minimal - in 16.7% and 3.3% of patients, respectively.In the first group, clinical disorders of venous outflow were absent in 20.0% of patients, a weak degree of severity was registered in 23.3%, an average - in 40.0%, and a strong one in 16.7% of patients, and in the second group, in 40 %, 26.7%, 30% and 3.3% of patients, respectively.Different minor hemorrhagic complications after Rivaroxaban intake occurred equally in both groups in each of ten patients. These complications were treated by the reduction of the anticoagulants dose.Complete restoration of the vein lumen occurred in the first group in 20.0%, and in the second group in 40.0% of patients, partial restoration, in 63.3% and 56.7% of patients, minimal - in 16.7% and 3.3% of patients respectively.In patients of the first group clinical venous congestion was absent in 20,0% of patients, mild congestion was manifested in 23,3% of patients, moderate - in 40,0% of patients, and severe was in 16,7% of cases. In the second group, the obtained data was 40%, 26,7%, 30%, and 3,3% of patients, respectively. Conclusion. Starting therapy with heparin and paravascular injection of anti-inflammatory mixture helps improve treatment outcomes.

Anticoagulation Treatment in Venous Thromboembolism: Options and Optimal Duration

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavrianna Diavati ◽  
Marios Sagris ◽  
Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios ◽  
Charalambos Vlachopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Clinical Genetic ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Anticoagulation Treatment ◽  
Molecular Pathophysiology ◽  
Deep Vein

: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinically presenting as deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), constitutes a major global healthcare concern with severe complications, long-term morbidity and mortality. Although several clinical, genetic and acquired risk factors for VTE have been identified, the molecular pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease progression remain poorly understood. Anticoagulation has been the cornerstone of therapy for decades, but there still are uncertainties regarding primary and secondary VTE prevention, as well as optimal therapy duration. In this review we discuss the role of factor Xa in coagulation cascade and the different choices of anticoagulation therapy based on patients’ predisposing risk factors and risk of event recurrence. Further, we compare newer agents to traditional anticoagulation treatment, based on most recent studies and guidelines.

scholarly journals Venous Thrombosis in Acquired Hemophilia: The Complex Management of Competing Pathologies

TH Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. e325-e330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manu Chhabra ◽  
Zhen Wan Stephanie Hii ◽  
Joseph Rajendran ◽  
Kuperan Ponnudurai ◽  
Bingwen Eugene Fan
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Associated Conditions ◽  
Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrates ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Introduction Venous thrombosis is rare in the setting of factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. Cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have been described in hemophiliacs after recent major surgery, or in association with the administration of FVIII concentrate and activated prothrombin complex concentrates, but occurrence of spontaneous DVT is even more uncommon. Aim We describe the challenging management of extensive DVT in a patient with acquired hemophilia A with concurrent hemorrhagic manifestations and review similar published cases. Methods We summarize a series of 10 cases with the following demographics: 6 males and 4 females; median age at presentation of 65 (21–80); mean inhibitor titer of 68.5 Bethesda Units (BU 1.9 to BU 350). Results Four cases were idiopathic and six had associated conditions (cancer [two cases], recent pregnancy [two cases], and recent surgery [two cases]). Three cases had an inferior vena cava filter inserted for acute lower limb DVT/pulmonary embolism. Inhibitor eradication was achieved with high-dose steroids with or without cyclophosphamide, and adjunct Rituximab administration was used in three cases. One patient received concurrent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Inhibitor eradication was fastest with concurrent TPE at 6 days (range: 6–733 days). The 30-day survival was 90%. Conclusions There was adequate response of inhibitors to immunosuppression with steroids and cyclophosphamide therapy. For more refractory disease, Rituximab is emerging as a beneficial and cost-effective adjunct with better rates of complete remission, and the threshold for its use may be lowered in this complex cohort with dual competing pathologies.

High utilization rate of vena cava filters in deep vein thrombosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (06) ◽  
pp. 1117-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Goldhaber ◽  
Victor Tapson ◽  
Michael Jaff
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Physician Education ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vena Cava Filters ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryThe objective was to investigate newly diagnosed patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who received inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs). A prospective registry enrolled 5451 patients from 183 US study sites. In all patients, examination by venous duplex ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis of DVT. We collected and analyzed data on 781 patients who received an IVCF . The most frequently prescribed treatments were low–molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin, which were used as a bridge to warfarin in 39% (n=2143) and 35% (n=1926) of patients, respectively. Of the total population, 781 (14%) (235 outpatients, 546 inpatients) underwent IVCF placement. The most common reasons for IVCF placement were contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 271), prophylaxis (n = 259), major bleeding related to anticoagulation therapy (n = 92), and anticoagulation failure (n = 73). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients were more likely to undergo IVCF insertion with multiple system organ failure (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.48–8.60), previous stroke (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.11–4.74), or history of pulmonary embolism (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.95–2.91). In conclusion, a surprisingly high 14% (781) of patients with confirmed DVT received an IVCF. Many of these patients may have warranted less invasive methods of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Improved physician education regarding mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis alternatives might reduce the use of IVCFs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document