scholarly journals Improving Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer after End of (Neo)adjuvant Therapy: Results from the Observational Study STEFANO

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Matthias Zaiss ◽  
Jens Uhlig ◽  
Mark-Oliver Zahn ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Helmar C. Lehmann ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect persisting after completion of neurotoxic chemotherapies. This observational study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the dietary supplement OnLife® (patented mixture of specific fatty acids and palmitoylethanolamide) in improving symptoms of CIPN in breast and colon cancer patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Improvement of CIPN was evaluated in adult patients, previously treated with (neo)adjuvant paclitaxel- (breast cancer) or oxaliplatin-based (colon cancer) therapies, receiving OnLife® for 3 months after completion of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to compare the severity of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) and peripheral motor neuropathy (PMN) before and at the end of OnLife® treatment. Secondary endpoints included the assessment of patient-reported quality of life and CIPN symptoms as assessed by questionnaires. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 146 patients (<i>n</i> = 75 breast cancer patients and <i>n</i> = 71 colon cancer patients) qualified for analysis; 31.1% and 37.5% of breast cancer patients had an improvement of PSN and PMN, respectively. In colon cancer patients, PSN and PMN improved in 16.9% and 20.0% of patients, respectively. According to patient-reported outcomes, 45.9% and 37.5% of patients with paclitaxel-induced PSN and PMN, and 23.9% and 22.0% of patients with oxaliplatin-induced PSN and PMN experienced a reduction of CIPN symptoms, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> OnLife® treatment confirmed to be beneficial in reducing CIPN severity and in limiting the progression of neuropathy, more markedly in paclitaxel-treated patients and also in patients with oxaliplatin-induced CIPN.

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idan Ben-Horin ◽  
Peretz Kahan ◽  
Larisa Ryvo ◽  
Moshe Inbar ◽  
Shahar Lev-Ari ◽  
...  

Background: Treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which affects approximately 30% to 40% of patients treated with neuropathy-causing agents, is mainly symptomatic. Currently available interventions are of little benefit. Study Design: This study was conducted as a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of acupuncture and reflexology in alleviating CIPN in breast cancer patients. Methods: Medical records of 30 consecutive breast cancer patients who received both chemotherapy and treatment for CIPN according to our Acupuncture and Reflexology Treatment for Neuropathy (ART-N) protocol between 2011 and 2012 were reviewed. Symptom severity was rated at baseline, during, and after treatment. Results: The records of 30 breast cancer patients who had been concomitantly treated with chemotherapy and ART-N for CIPN were retrieved. Two records were incomplete, leaving a total of 28 patients who were enrolled into the study. Twenty patients (71%) had sensory neuropathy, 7 (25%) had motor neuropathy, and 1 (4%) had both sensory and motor neuropathy. Only 2 (10%) of the 20 patients with grades 1 to 2 neuropathy still reported symptoms at 12 months since starting the ART-N protocol. All 8 patients who presented with grades 3 to 4 neuropathy were symptom-free at the 12-month evaluation. Overall, 26 patients (93%) had complete resolution of CIPN symptoms. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that a joint protocol of acupuncture and reflexology has a potential to improve symptoms of CIPN in breast cancer patients. The protocol should be validated on a larger cohort with a control group. It also warrants testing as a preventive intervention.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20505-e20505
Author(s):  
C. C. Reyes-Gibby ◽  
P. Morrow

e20505 Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) remains difficult to control for a significant proportion of patients with cancer. Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is postulated as an initial stage to the development of NP. Among breast cancer patients, taxanes, platinum agents, and vinca alkaloids are most likely to cause NP. The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which those who experienced CIPN (NCI toxicity criteria ≥ grade 2 sensory neuropathy) during paclitaxel chemotherapy were at risk of developing chronic NP, controlling for disease- and treatment-related variables (e.g., stage of disease, location of tumor chemotherapy and other cancer therapies, dose of chemotherapy and duration of treatment), clinical health status (e.g., comorbid conditions), and sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, race). Methods: We conducted a follow-up survey of breast cancer patients who previously participated in clinical trials for paclitaxel. Patients were asked if they have ever been diagnosed by the physician or healthcare provider for NP during the survey. Clinical trial data (NCI Toxicity, cummulative dose) were abstracted from a clinical database. Results: Of the 430 potential respondents, 240 responded to the survey. Mean follow-up time was 9.5 years (SD=2.1). Sixty three percent of the respondents had grade 2 or greater sensory neuropathy during their previous treatment with paclitaxel. Follow-up data showed that 18% (43/240) were subsequently diagnosed by their physician to have NP. Logistic regression analysis showed that those with CIPN during the trial were 3 times more likely to having been diagnosed with NP (OR=3; 95%CI=1.2; 7.2; p<0.001), which persisted in the multivariable model. Other variables found to be associated with NP included cummulative dose of paclitaxel, and comorbid conditions such as diabetes and osteoarthritis. Patients with NP reported twice as many visits to their health care provider (p=0.028); had taken more prescription (50% versus 19%; p=0.0001) for pain relative to those without NP. Conclusions: We provide empirical evidence on the importance CIPN as a risk factor for NP in breast cancer patients.Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v96-v97
Author(s):  
Y. Sakata ◽  
H. Iwata ◽  
H. Ikezawa ◽  
R. Fudetani ◽  
D. Tonoda ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Prochilo ◽  
Alessandra Huscher ◽  
Federica Andreis ◽  
Mara Mirandola ◽  
Elisabetta Zaina ◽  
...  

Background: The most effective agents in the treatment of breast cancer have a common side effect, the hair loss. Some studies reported a reduction of hair loss with the use of the scalp cooling device. Indeed, it decreases the drug accumulation in the hair follicles. We report our preliminary experience with a scalp cooling device in reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia and related distress in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. </P><P> Methods: Hair loss grading and treatment tolerability were evaluated during chemotherapy every 21 days and 3 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy via Dean’s scale by patients and operators and a comfort analogic scale by patients. We administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire at the baseline and at the end of treatment to assess the distress related to chemotherapy- induced alopecia. Results: Among the 46 patients identified, 27 accepted the device. The eligible chemotherapy regimens included docetaxel+cyclophosphamide (TC), doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide (AC) and paclitaxel (P) weekly+trastuzumab (T). 24 pts (89%) completed the treatment; 3 pts (11%) treated with AC prematurely interrupted use of the scalp-cooling device due to inefficacy. After the last cycle of chemotherapy, the number of patient who perceived a HL < grade 2 was 16 (59%). The hair retention reported by operators has been higher (78%). 81.5% of patients well tolerated the treatment. Conclusion: In our study, the scalp-cooling device reduced chemotherapy-induced alopecia in taxane- based chemotherapy. Furthermore, it suggests a discordance in hair loss perception between patients and operators.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e033461
Author(s):  
Kyeore Bae ◽  
Si Yeon Song

IntroductionAromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) is a major adverse event of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and leads to premature discontinuation of AI therapy in breast cancer patients. The objective of this protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to provide the methodology to compare the change in pain intensity between different AIA treatments and demonstrate the rank probabilities for different treatments by combining all available direct and indirect evidence.Methods and analysisPubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched to identify publications in English from inception to November 2019. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different treatments for AIA in postmenopausal women with stage 0–III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoints will be the change in patient-reported pain intensity from baseline to post-treatment. The number of adverse events will be presented as a secondary outcome.Both pairwise meta-analysis and NMA with the Frequentist approach will be conducted. We will demonstrate summary estimates with forest plots in meta-analysis and direct and mixed evidence with a ranking of the treatments as the P-score in NMA. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials will be used to assess the methodological quality within individual RCTs. The quality of evidence will be assessed.Ethics and disseminationAs this review does not involve individual patients, ethical approval is not required. The results of this systematic review and NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. This review will provide valuable information on AIA therapeutic options for clinicians, health practitioners and breast cancer survivors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019136967.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document